Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: 06AQANTVIII_2; WOCE SR02a; 06AQ19890906; 06AQANTVIII_2; WOCE SR02a; ant8.2sv; SR02a
The selected Calculated Carbon Parameterwill be exported as is and displayed in red with subscript "c", e.g. -0.123456c! No data available? Insert -999 No suggestion for adjustment possible? Insert -888 To calibrate CTDsal use: CTDsal_calibrated = (CTDsal - CTDsal_intercept) / CTDsal_slope To calibrate CTDoxy use: CTDoxy_calibrated = (CTDoxy - CTDoxy_intercept) / CTDoxy_slope
Insert/leave -999 to match up to last station e.g. when last station is unknown!NOTICE - adjustment values are copied from stations 1-last!
Selected region(s) for this cruise: Atlantic Ocean
View 0 annotation(s) (Lists all annotations)
Add annotation: Cancel
Subject for your annotation:
Your annotation re. adjustment :
- none -
Hide annotations
Insert/leave -999 to match up to last station e.g. when last station is unknown!
[autogenerated from RC_Toste/adjustments!]
[autogenerated from manual_xovers/adjustments!]
View 23 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
Add comment: Cancel
Subject for your comment:
Your comment re. adjustment for :
Comments specific to a parameter should include the cruise's expocode and the parameter name in the subject as they appear all in a single collection of comments pertaining to this cruise
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy andCTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,QC flag removed.Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QCflag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:22 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make 1.005. Cruise appears to bebiased slightly low, might require 1.005 to 1.01. Although formally withinlimits, xovers are precise enough to warrant adjustment.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:55 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.02
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : temp
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00. Cruise is a perfectmatch with AQ2005, 08, 10
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain -999
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 0
autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:37 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: only BOTsal available (no CTDsal)
autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: using BOTsal (no CTDsal)
Both in CARINA and GLODAP1 the mean offset is only slight (1.017 and 1.026),number of x-overs being similar.New inversion for phosphate in the Atlantic with 10 core cruises assignedsuggests adjustment of 0.96 which fits somewhat better to the mean offset. Itherefore suggest to use this adjustment, i.e. 0.96
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2012-11-23 19:37:18 UTC - Edit - Delete
The inversion suggest a correction of 1.0077 based on 7 crossovers with a meanoffset of 0.996. Do not adjust. This is in agreement with CARINA
Posted by are.olsen@gfi.uib.no on 2012-09-24 10:19:05 UTC - Edit - Delete
The inversion suggests a correction of 1.0216, and mean offset is 0.977, lookslow (except compared to (1800) 06AQ19960317 which is low). I recommend thatthese data are adjusted using a factor of 1.02. This is in complete agreementwith CARINA suggested adjustment
Posted by are.olsen@gfi.uib.no on 2012-09-14 13:42:42 UTC - Edit - Delete
Suggested correction is 0.9844, and MO 1.026. Appears a bit high. Suggestadjustment of 0.98. Same direction but smaller than CARINA adjustment of0.95.Use CARINA adjustment as it is based on more data.
Posted by are.olsen@gfi.uib.no on 2012-09-11 13:22:01 UTC - Edit - Delete
Suggested correction is 1.0114, MO is 1.002. Do not adjust. Consistent withCARINA.
Posted by are.olsen@gfi.uib.no on 2012-09-03 09:30:53 UTC - Edit - Delete
The inversion suggest a correction of 4.01 ppm. Do not adjust. This isconsistent with CARINA
Posted by are.olsen@gfi.uib.no on 2012-08-31 10:54:23 UTC - Edit - Delete
Average of all cross-overs is: -4.1 ppmInversion analysis suggests an adjustment of: +4Cross-overs with core cruises are inconclusive.I suggest NO adjustment. 13 June 2008,Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-13 12:04:58 UTC - Edit - Delete
Average of all cross-overs is: 0.996Inversion analysis suggests no significant adjustment (1.004).Although there is some variation in the cross-over results, there is no reasonfor an adjustment.I suggest NO adjustment of oxygen for cruise 06AQ19890906.10 June 2008,Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-10 14:28:20 UTC - Edit - Delete
Average of all cross-overs is: 0.991Inversion analysis suggests no significant adjustment (1.006).The average of cross-overs would be somewhat lower if manual cross-overs wouldbe included, and also the core cruises (316N19831007, 06AQ19960317) appear tosuggest that cruise 06AQ19890906 be somewhat low.I therefore suggest the minimum adjustment of silicate for cruise 06AQ19890906of 1.0210 June 2008,Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-10 14:15:47 UTC - Edit - Delete
Average of all cross-overs is: 1.017Inversion analysis suggests an adjustment of 0.945The mean cross-over is reduced by one very low cruise (58A119890214). The corecruise 316N19831007 and 06AQ19960317 appear to support the suggested adjustment.I therefore suggest an adjustment of phosphate for cruise 06AQ19890906 amountingto 0.9510 June 2008,Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-10 14:07:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
Average of all cross-overs is: 1.014Inversion analysis suggests no significant adjustment (0.994)Cross-overs with core cruises do not support that an adjustment is warranted.I suggest NO adjustment of nitrate for cruise 06AQ19890906.10 June 2008,Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-10 13:56:49 UTC - Edit - Delete
Hide comments
View 0 ReadMe(s) (Lists all ReadMes)
Hide ReadMe file(s)
Add a ReadMe: Cancel
Subject for your ReadMe (should be somewhat unique):
Insert your ReadMe for this cruise:
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
Your comment re. adjustment for salinity:
View comment(s) (filtered by ctd_salinity in subject)
Your comment re. adjustment for ctd_salinity:
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
Your comment re. adjustment for tco2:
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
Your comment re. adjustment for alkalinity:
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
Your comment re. adjustment for ph:
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
Your comment re. adjustment for nitrate:
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
Your comment re. adjustment for phosphate:
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
Your comment re. adjustment for silicate:
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
Your comment re. adjustment for oxygen:
View comment(s) (filtered by ctd_oxygen in subject)
Your comment re. adjustment for ctd_oxygen:
View comment(s) (filtered by cfc12 in subject)
Your comment re. adjustment for cfc12:
View comment(s) (filtered by cfc11 in subject)
Your comment re. adjustment for cfc11:
View comment(s) (filtered by cfc113 in subject)
Your comment re. adjustment for cfc113:
View comment(s) (filtered by ccl4 in subject)
Your comment re. adjustment for ccl4:
Please wait while loading list of related files…