Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update - (current GLODAPv2/CARBOOCEAN comment)

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:16 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make 0.975. Average of xovers and
inversion suggestion (dens error?)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00 (not re-inspected
for GLODAPv2)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Data unacceptably noisy
(spread of >10% within profiles, scatter between profiles).

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Too few profiles (2?),
of too low precision to allow adjustment.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : Maintain 0. Very few profiles.
Can't clearly verify accuracy, but certainly not worse than +-4. Want to retain
due to early 1990 data being scarce.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Autogenerated comment - salinity - (current GLODAPv2/CARBOOCEAN comment)

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain -0.020

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC - Edit - Delete

06MT19920509/salinity: update slope+intercept - (current GLODAPv2/CARBOOCEAN comment)

autogenerated: only BOTsal available (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC - Edit - Delete

06MT19920509/salinity: init slope+intercept - (current GLODAPv2/CARBOOCEAN comment)

autogenerated: using BOTsal (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 1.04.
The inversin suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that an adjustment of this
magnitude is motivated.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
Toste Tanhua,
Keil, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:47:43 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 0.96, but with large variability.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of 1.02.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that 06MT19920509 might be a bit
low in silicate, but with large variability.
Based on this, I suggest that no adjustment is done for silicate.
Toste Tanhua,
Kile, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:42:59 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1.10, and the inversion suggest an adjustment
of 0.9.
The cross-overs with the core cruises confirms that an adjustment of this
magnitude is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:37:05 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1, and the inversion suggest an adjustment of
1.02.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that no adjustment is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:33:28 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1, and the inversion suggest an adjustment of
-4.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that no adjustment is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:18:49 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all crossovers is -0.9.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -2.
The cross-overs with the core cruises confirms that no adjustment is necessary.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:15:02 UTC - Edit - Delete

06MT19920509 - salinity - (current GLODAPv2/CARBOOCEAN comment)

The average of all cross overs is 22.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -22.
The cross overs with the core-cruises confirm these numbers.
Based on these evidence, I suggest an adjustment of -22.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 20080725

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:11:53 UTC - Edit - Delete

Druing the meeting in Paris it was decided that 06MT19920322 really was several
legs that deserved to be listed as different cruises (evident from, for
instance, salinity offsets).
The new cruises are now:
06MT19920701 NA+AMS
06MT19920509 NA
06MT19920316 NA
For the figures already uploaded to the website, they have all been moved to
06MT19920701, since this cruise covers both NA and AMS region, but be aware that
these plots can contain data from any of the 3 cruises listed above.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-22 09:38:17 UTC - Edit - Delete

Hide comments

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update - (current GLODAPv2/CARBOOCEAN comment)

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:16 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make 0.975. Average of xovers and
inversion suggestion (dens error?)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00 (not re-inspected
for GLODAPv2)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Data unacceptably noisy
(spread of >10% within profiles, scatter between profiles).

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Too few profiles (2?),
of too low precision to allow adjustment.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : Maintain 0. Very few profiles.
Can't clearly verify accuracy, but certainly not worse than +-4. Want to retain
due to early 1990 data being scarce.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain -0.020

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: only BOTsal available (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: using BOTsal (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 1.04.
The inversin suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that an adjustment of this
magnitude is motivated.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
Toste Tanhua,
Keil, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:47:43 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 0.96, but with large variability.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of 1.02.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that 06MT19920509 might be a bit
low in silicate, but with large variability.
Based on this, I suggest that no adjustment is done for silicate.
Toste Tanhua,
Kile, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:42:59 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1.10, and the inversion suggest an adjustment
of 0.9.
The cross-overs with the core cruises confirms that an adjustment of this
magnitude is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:37:05 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1, and the inversion suggest an adjustment of
1.02.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that no adjustment is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:33:28 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1, and the inversion suggest an adjustment of
-4.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that no adjustment is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:18:49 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all crossovers is -0.9.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -2.
The cross-overs with the core cruises confirms that no adjustment is necessary.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:15:02 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 22.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -22.
The cross overs with the core-cruises confirm these numbers.
Based on these evidence, I suggest an adjustment of -22.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 20080725

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:11:53 UTC - Edit - Delete

Druing the meeting in Paris it was decided that 06MT19920322 really was several
legs that deserved to be listed as different cruises (evident from, for
instance, salinity offsets).
The new cruises are now:
06MT19920701 NA+AMS
06MT19920509 NA
06MT19920316 NA
For the figures already uploaded to the website, they have all been moved to
06MT19920701, since this cruise covers both NA and AMS region, but be aware that
these plots can contain data from any of the 3 cruises listed above.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-22 09:38:17 UTC - Edit - Delete

Hide comments

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:16 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make 0.975. Average of xovers and
inversion suggestion (dens error?)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00 (not re-inspected
for GLODAPv2)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Data unacceptably noisy
(spread of >10% within profiles, scatter between profiles).

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Too few profiles (2?),
of too low precision to allow adjustment.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Autogenerated comment - tCO2 - (current GLODAPv2/CARBOOCEAN comment)

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : Maintain 0. Very few profiles.
Can't clearly verify accuracy, but certainly not worse than +-4. Want to retain
due to early 1990 data being scarce.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain -0.020

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: only BOTsal available (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: using BOTsal (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 1.04.
The inversin suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that an adjustment of this
magnitude is motivated.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
Toste Tanhua,
Keil, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:47:43 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 0.96, but with large variability.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of 1.02.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that 06MT19920509 might be a bit
low in silicate, but with large variability.
Based on this, I suggest that no adjustment is done for silicate.
Toste Tanhua,
Kile, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:42:59 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1.10, and the inversion suggest an adjustment
of 0.9.
The cross-overs with the core cruises confirms that an adjustment of this
magnitude is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:37:05 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1, and the inversion suggest an adjustment of
1.02.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that no adjustment is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:33:28 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1, and the inversion suggest an adjustment of
-4.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that no adjustment is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:18:49 UTC - Edit - Delete

06MT19920509 - tco2 - (current GLODAPv2/CARBOOCEAN comment)

The average of all crossovers is -0.9.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -2.
The cross-overs with the core cruises confirms that no adjustment is necessary.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:15:02 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 22.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -22.
The cross overs with the core-cruises confirm these numbers.
Based on these evidence, I suggest an adjustment of -22.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 20080725

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:11:53 UTC - Edit - Delete

Druing the meeting in Paris it was decided that 06MT19920322 really was several
legs that deserved to be listed as different cruises (evident from, for
instance, salinity offsets).
The new cruises are now:
06MT19920701 NA+AMS
06MT19920509 NA
06MT19920316 NA
For the figures already uploaded to the website, they have all been moved to
06MT19920701, since this cruise covers both NA and AMS region, but be aware that
these plots can contain data from any of the 3 cruises listed above.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-22 09:38:17 UTC - Edit - Delete

Hide comments

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:16 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make 0.975. Average of xovers and
inversion suggestion (dens error?)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00 (not re-inspected
for GLODAPv2)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Data unacceptably noisy
(spread of >10% within profiles, scatter between profiles).

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Autogenerated comment - alkalinity - (current GLODAPv2/CARBOOCEAN comment)

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Too few profiles (2?),
of too low precision to allow adjustment.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : Maintain 0. Very few profiles.
Can't clearly verify accuracy, but certainly not worse than +-4. Want to retain
due to early 1990 data being scarce.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain -0.020

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: only BOTsal available (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: using BOTsal (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 1.04.
The inversin suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that an adjustment of this
magnitude is motivated.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
Toste Tanhua,
Keil, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:47:43 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 0.96, but with large variability.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of 1.02.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that 06MT19920509 might be a bit
low in silicate, but with large variability.
Based on this, I suggest that no adjustment is done for silicate.
Toste Tanhua,
Kile, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:42:59 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1.10, and the inversion suggest an adjustment
of 0.9.
The cross-overs with the core cruises confirms that an adjustment of this
magnitude is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:37:05 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1, and the inversion suggest an adjustment of
1.02.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that no adjustment is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:33:28 UTC - Edit - Delete

06MT19920509 - alkalinity - (current GLODAPv2/CARBOOCEAN comment)

The average of all cross-overs is 1, and the inversion suggest an adjustment of
-4.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that no adjustment is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:18:49 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all crossovers is -0.9.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -2.
The cross-overs with the core cruises confirms that no adjustment is necessary.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:15:02 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 22.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -22.
The cross overs with the core-cruises confirm these numbers.
Based on these evidence, I suggest an adjustment of -22.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 20080725

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:11:53 UTC - Edit - Delete

Druing the meeting in Paris it was decided that 06MT19920322 really was several
legs that deserved to be listed as different cruises (evident from, for
instance, salinity offsets).
The new cruises are now:
06MT19920701 NA+AMS
06MT19920509 NA
06MT19920316 NA
For the figures already uploaded to the website, they have all been moved to
06MT19920701, since this cruise covers both NA and AMS region, but be aware that
these plots can contain data from any of the 3 cruises listed above.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-22 09:38:17 UTC - Edit - Delete

Hide comments

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:16 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make 0.975. Average of xovers and
inversion suggestion (dens error?)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00 (not re-inspected
for GLODAPv2)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Autogenerated comment - phosphate - (current GLODAPv2/CARBOOCEAN comment)

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Data unacceptably noisy
(spread of >10% within profiles, scatter between profiles).

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Too few profiles (2?),
of too low precision to allow adjustment.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : Maintain 0. Very few profiles.
Can't clearly verify accuracy, but certainly not worse than +-4. Want to retain
due to early 1990 data being scarce.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain -0.020

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: only BOTsal available (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: using BOTsal (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 1.04.
The inversin suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that an adjustment of this
magnitude is motivated.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
Toste Tanhua,
Keil, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:47:43 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 0.96, but with large variability.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of 1.02.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that 06MT19920509 might be a bit
low in silicate, but with large variability.
Based on this, I suggest that no adjustment is done for silicate.
Toste Tanhua,
Kile, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:42:59 UTC - Edit - Delete

06MT19920509 - phosphate - (current GLODAPv2/CARBOOCEAN comment)

The average of all cross-overs is 1.10, and the inversion suggest an adjustment
of 0.9.
The cross-overs with the core cruises confirms that an adjustment of this
magnitude is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:37:05 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1, and the inversion suggest an adjustment of
1.02.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that no adjustment is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:33:28 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1, and the inversion suggest an adjustment of
-4.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that no adjustment is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:18:49 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all crossovers is -0.9.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -2.
The cross-overs with the core cruises confirms that no adjustment is necessary.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:15:02 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 22.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -22.
The cross overs with the core-cruises confirm these numbers.
Based on these evidence, I suggest an adjustment of -22.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 20080725

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:11:53 UTC - Edit - Delete

Druing the meeting in Paris it was decided that 06MT19920322 really was several
legs that deserved to be listed as different cruises (evident from, for
instance, salinity offsets).
The new cruises are now:
06MT19920701 NA+AMS
06MT19920509 NA
06MT19920316 NA
For the figures already uploaded to the website, they have all been moved to
06MT19920701, since this cruise covers both NA and AMS region, but be aware that
these plots can contain data from any of the 3 cruises listed above.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-22 09:38:17 UTC - Edit - Delete

Hide comments

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:16 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make 0.975. Average of xovers and
inversion suggestion (dens error?)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00 (not re-inspected
for GLODAPv2)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Data unacceptably noisy
(spread of >10% within profiles, scatter between profiles).

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Autogenerated comment - nitrate - (current GLODAPv2/CARBOOCEAN comment)

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Too few profiles (2?),
of too low precision to allow adjustment.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : Maintain 0. Very few profiles.
Can't clearly verify accuracy, but certainly not worse than +-4. Want to retain
due to early 1990 data being scarce.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain -0.020

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: only BOTsal available (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: using BOTsal (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 1.04.
The inversin suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that an adjustment of this
magnitude is motivated.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
Toste Tanhua,
Keil, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:47:43 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 0.96, but with large variability.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of 1.02.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that 06MT19920509 might be a bit
low in silicate, but with large variability.
Based on this, I suggest that no adjustment is done for silicate.
Toste Tanhua,
Kile, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:42:59 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1.10, and the inversion suggest an adjustment
of 0.9.
The cross-overs with the core cruises confirms that an adjustment of this
magnitude is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:37:05 UTC - Edit - Delete

06MT19920509 - nitrate - (current GLODAPv2/CARBOOCEAN comment)

The average of all cross-overs is 1, and the inversion suggest an adjustment of
1.02.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that no adjustment is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:33:28 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1, and the inversion suggest an adjustment of
-4.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that no adjustment is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:18:49 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all crossovers is -0.9.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -2.
The cross-overs with the core cruises confirms that no adjustment is necessary.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:15:02 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 22.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -22.
The cross overs with the core-cruises confirm these numbers.
Based on these evidence, I suggest an adjustment of -22.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 20080725

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:11:53 UTC - Edit - Delete

Druing the meeting in Paris it was decided that 06MT19920322 really was several
legs that deserved to be listed as different cruises (evident from, for
instance, salinity offsets).
The new cruises are now:
06MT19920701 NA+AMS
06MT19920509 NA
06MT19920316 NA
For the figures already uploaded to the website, they have all been moved to
06MT19920701, since this cruise covers both NA and AMS region, but be aware that
these plots can contain data from any of the 3 cruises listed above.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-22 09:38:17 UTC - Edit - Delete

Hide comments

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:16 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make 0.975. Average of xovers and
inversion suggestion (dens error?)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00 (not re-inspected
for GLODAPv2)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Autogenerated comment - phosphate - (current GLODAPv2/CARBOOCEAN comment)

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Data unacceptably noisy
(spread of >10% within profiles, scatter between profiles).

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Too few profiles (2?),
of too low precision to allow adjustment.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : Maintain 0. Very few profiles.
Can't clearly verify accuracy, but certainly not worse than +-4. Want to retain
due to early 1990 data being scarce.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain -0.020

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: only BOTsal available (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: using BOTsal (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 1.04.
The inversin suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that an adjustment of this
magnitude is motivated.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
Toste Tanhua,
Keil, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:47:43 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 0.96, but with large variability.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of 1.02.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that 06MT19920509 might be a bit
low in silicate, but with large variability.
Based on this, I suggest that no adjustment is done for silicate.
Toste Tanhua,
Kile, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:42:59 UTC - Edit - Delete

06MT19920509 - phosphate - (current GLODAPv2/CARBOOCEAN comment)

The average of all cross-overs is 1.10, and the inversion suggest an adjustment
of 0.9.
The cross-overs with the core cruises confirms that an adjustment of this
magnitude is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:37:05 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1, and the inversion suggest an adjustment of
1.02.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that no adjustment is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:33:28 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1, and the inversion suggest an adjustment of
-4.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that no adjustment is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:18:49 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all crossovers is -0.9.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -2.
The cross-overs with the core cruises confirms that no adjustment is necessary.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:15:02 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 22.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -22.
The cross overs with the core-cruises confirm these numbers.
Based on these evidence, I suggest an adjustment of -22.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 20080725

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:11:53 UTC - Edit - Delete

Druing the meeting in Paris it was decided that 06MT19920322 really was several
legs that deserved to be listed as different cruises (evident from, for
instance, salinity offsets).
The new cruises are now:
06MT19920701 NA+AMS
06MT19920509 NA
06MT19920316 NA
For the figures already uploaded to the website, they have all been moved to
06MT19920701, since this cruise covers both NA and AMS region, but be aware that
these plots can contain data from any of the 3 cruises listed above.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-22 09:38:17 UTC - Edit - Delete

Hide comments

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:16 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make 0.975. Average of xovers and
inversion suggestion (dens error?)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Autogenerated comment - silicate - (current GLODAPv2/CARBOOCEAN comment)

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00 (not re-inspected
for GLODAPv2)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Data unacceptably noisy
(spread of >10% within profiles, scatter between profiles).

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Too few profiles (2?),
of too low precision to allow adjustment.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : Maintain 0. Very few profiles.
Can't clearly verify accuracy, but certainly not worse than +-4. Want to retain
due to early 1990 data being scarce.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain -0.020

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: only BOTsal available (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: using BOTsal (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 1.04.
The inversin suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that an adjustment of this
magnitude is motivated.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
Toste Tanhua,
Keil, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:47:43 UTC - Edit - Delete

06MT19920509 - silicate - (current GLODAPv2/CARBOOCEAN comment)

The average of all cross overs is 0.96, but with large variability.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of 1.02.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that 06MT19920509 might be a bit
low in silicate, but with large variability.
Based on this, I suggest that no adjustment is done for silicate.
Toste Tanhua,
Kile, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:42:59 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1.10, and the inversion suggest an adjustment
of 0.9.
The cross-overs with the core cruises confirms that an adjustment of this
magnitude is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:37:05 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1, and the inversion suggest an adjustment of
1.02.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that no adjustment is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:33:28 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1, and the inversion suggest an adjustment of
-4.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that no adjustment is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:18:49 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all crossovers is -0.9.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -2.
The cross-overs with the core cruises confirms that no adjustment is necessary.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:15:02 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 22.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -22.
The cross overs with the core-cruises confirm these numbers.
Based on these evidence, I suggest an adjustment of -22.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 20080725

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:11:53 UTC - Edit - Delete

Druing the meeting in Paris it was decided that 06MT19920322 really was several
legs that deserved to be listed as different cruises (evident from, for
instance, salinity offsets).
The new cruises are now:
06MT19920701 NA+AMS
06MT19920509 NA
06MT19920316 NA
For the figures already uploaded to the website, they have all been moved to
06MT19920701, since this cruise covers both NA and AMS region, but be aware that
these plots can contain data from any of the 3 cruises listed above.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-22 09:38:17 UTC - Edit - Delete

Hide comments

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update - (current GLODAPv2/CARBOOCEAN comment)

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:16 UTC - Edit - Delete

Autogenerated comment - oxygen - (current GLODAPv2/CARBOOCEAN comment)

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make 0.975. Average of xovers and
inversion suggestion (dens error?)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00 (not re-inspected
for GLODAPv2)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Data unacceptably noisy
(spread of >10% within profiles, scatter between profiles).

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Too few profiles (2?),
of too low precision to allow adjustment.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : Maintain 0. Very few profiles.
Can't clearly verify accuracy, but certainly not worse than +-4. Want to retain
due to early 1990 data being scarce.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain -0.020

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

06MT19920509/oxygen: update slope+intercept - (current GLODAPv2/CARBOOCEAN comment)

autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: only BOTsal available (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC - Edit - Delete

06MT19920509/oxygen: init slope+intercept - (current GLODAPv2/CARBOOCEAN comment)

autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: using BOTsal (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC - Edit - Delete

06MT19920509 - oxygen - (current GLODAPv2/CARBOOCEAN comment)

The average of all cross overs is 1.04.
The inversin suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that an adjustment of this
magnitude is motivated.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
Toste Tanhua,
Keil, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:47:43 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 0.96, but with large variability.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of 1.02.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that 06MT19920509 might be a bit
low in silicate, but with large variability.
Based on this, I suggest that no adjustment is done for silicate.
Toste Tanhua,
Kile, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:42:59 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1.10, and the inversion suggest an adjustment
of 0.9.
The cross-overs with the core cruises confirms that an adjustment of this
magnitude is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:37:05 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1, and the inversion suggest an adjustment of
1.02.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that no adjustment is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:33:28 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1, and the inversion suggest an adjustment of
-4.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that no adjustment is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:18:49 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all crossovers is -0.9.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -2.
The cross-overs with the core cruises confirms that no adjustment is necessary.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:15:02 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 22.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -22.
The cross overs with the core-cruises confirm these numbers.
Based on these evidence, I suggest an adjustment of -22.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 20080725

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:11:53 UTC - Edit - Delete

Druing the meeting in Paris it was decided that 06MT19920322 really was several
legs that deserved to be listed as different cruises (evident from, for
instance, salinity offsets).
The new cruises are now:
06MT19920701 NA+AMS
06MT19920509 NA
06MT19920316 NA
For the figures already uploaded to the website, they have all been moved to
06MT19920701, since this cruise covers both NA and AMS region, but be aware that
these plots can contain data from any of the 3 cruises listed above.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-22 09:38:17 UTC - Edit - Delete

Hide comments

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update - (current GLODAPv2/CARBOOCEAN comment)

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:16 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make 0.975. Average of xovers and
inversion suggestion (dens error?)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00 (not re-inspected
for GLODAPv2)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Data unacceptably noisy
(spread of >10% within profiles, scatter between profiles).

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Too few profiles (2?),
of too low precision to allow adjustment.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : Maintain 0. Very few profiles.
Can't clearly verify accuracy, but certainly not worse than +-4. Want to retain
due to early 1990 data being scarce.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain -0.020

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: only BOTsal available (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: using BOTsal (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 1.04.
The inversin suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that an adjustment of this
magnitude is motivated.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
Toste Tanhua,
Keil, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:47:43 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 0.96, but with large variability.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of 1.02.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that 06MT19920509 might be a bit
low in silicate, but with large variability.
Based on this, I suggest that no adjustment is done for silicate.
Toste Tanhua,
Kile, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:42:59 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1.10, and the inversion suggest an adjustment
of 0.9.
The cross-overs with the core cruises confirms that an adjustment of this
magnitude is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:37:05 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1, and the inversion suggest an adjustment of
1.02.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that no adjustment is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:33:28 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1, and the inversion suggest an adjustment of
-4.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that no adjustment is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:18:49 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all crossovers is -0.9.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -2.
The cross-overs with the core cruises confirms that no adjustment is necessary.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:15:02 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 22.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -22.
The cross overs with the core-cruises confirm these numbers.
Based on these evidence, I suggest an adjustment of -22.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 20080725

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:11:53 UTC - Edit - Delete

Druing the meeting in Paris it was decided that 06MT19920322 really was several
legs that deserved to be listed as different cruises (evident from, for
instance, salinity offsets).
The new cruises are now:
06MT19920701 NA+AMS
06MT19920509 NA
06MT19920316 NA
For the figures already uploaded to the website, they have all been moved to
06MT19920701, since this cruise covers both NA and AMS region, but be aware that
these plots can contain data from any of the 3 cruises listed above.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-22 09:38:17 UTC - Edit - Delete

Hide comments

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:16 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make 0.975. Average of xovers and
inversion suggestion (dens error?)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00 (not re-inspected
for GLODAPv2)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Data unacceptably noisy
(spread of >10% within profiles, scatter between profiles).

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Too few profiles (2?),
of too low precision to allow adjustment.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : Maintain 0. Very few profiles.
Can't clearly verify accuracy, but certainly not worse than +-4. Want to retain
due to early 1990 data being scarce.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain -0.020

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: only BOTsal available (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: using BOTsal (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 1.04.
The inversin suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that an adjustment of this
magnitude is motivated.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
Toste Tanhua,
Keil, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:47:43 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 0.96, but with large variability.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of 1.02.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that 06MT19920509 might be a bit
low in silicate, but with large variability.
Based on this, I suggest that no adjustment is done for silicate.
Toste Tanhua,
Kile, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:42:59 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1.10, and the inversion suggest an adjustment
of 0.9.
The cross-overs with the core cruises confirms that an adjustment of this
magnitude is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:37:05 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1, and the inversion suggest an adjustment of
1.02.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that no adjustment is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:33:28 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1, and the inversion suggest an adjustment of
-4.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that no adjustment is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:18:49 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all crossovers is -0.9.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -2.
The cross-overs with the core cruises confirms that no adjustment is necessary.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:15:02 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 22.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -22.
The cross overs with the core-cruises confirm these numbers.
Based on these evidence, I suggest an adjustment of -22.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 20080725

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:11:53 UTC - Edit - Delete

Druing the meeting in Paris it was decided that 06MT19920322 really was several
legs that deserved to be listed as different cruises (evident from, for
instance, salinity offsets).
The new cruises are now:
06MT19920701 NA+AMS
06MT19920509 NA
06MT19920316 NA
For the figures already uploaded to the website, they have all been moved to
06MT19920701, since this cruise covers both NA and AMS region, but be aware that
these plots can contain data from any of the 3 cruises listed above.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-22 09:38:17 UTC - Edit - Delete

Hide comments

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:16 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make 0.975. Average of xovers and
inversion suggestion (dens error?)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00 (not re-inspected
for GLODAPv2)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Data unacceptably noisy
(spread of >10% within profiles, scatter between profiles).

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Too few profiles (2?),
of too low precision to allow adjustment.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : Maintain 0. Very few profiles.
Can't clearly verify accuracy, but certainly not worse than +-4. Want to retain
due to early 1990 data being scarce.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain -0.020

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: only BOTsal available (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: using BOTsal (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 1.04.
The inversin suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that an adjustment of this
magnitude is motivated.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
Toste Tanhua,
Keil, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:47:43 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 0.96, but with large variability.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of 1.02.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that 06MT19920509 might be a bit
low in silicate, but with large variability.
Based on this, I suggest that no adjustment is done for silicate.
Toste Tanhua,
Kile, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:42:59 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1.10, and the inversion suggest an adjustment
of 0.9.
The cross-overs with the core cruises confirms that an adjustment of this
magnitude is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:37:05 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1, and the inversion suggest an adjustment of
1.02.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that no adjustment is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:33:28 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1, and the inversion suggest an adjustment of
-4.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that no adjustment is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:18:49 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all crossovers is -0.9.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -2.
The cross-overs with the core cruises confirms that no adjustment is necessary.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:15:02 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 22.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -22.
The cross overs with the core-cruises confirm these numbers.
Based on these evidence, I suggest an adjustment of -22.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 20080725

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:11:53 UTC - Edit - Delete

Druing the meeting in Paris it was decided that 06MT19920322 really was several
legs that deserved to be listed as different cruises (evident from, for
instance, salinity offsets).
The new cruises are now:
06MT19920701 NA+AMS
06MT19920509 NA
06MT19920316 NA
For the figures already uploaded to the website, they have all been moved to
06MT19920701, since this cruise covers both NA and AMS region, but be aware that
these plots can contain data from any of the 3 cruises listed above.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-22 09:38:17 UTC - Edit - Delete

Hide comments

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:16 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make 0.975. Average of xovers and
inversion suggestion (dens error?)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00 (not re-inspected
for GLODAPv2)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Data unacceptably noisy
(spread of >10% within profiles, scatter between profiles).

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Too few profiles (2?),
of too low precision to allow adjustment.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : Maintain 0. Very few profiles.
Can't clearly verify accuracy, but certainly not worse than +-4. Want to retain
due to early 1990 data being scarce.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain -0.020

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: only BOTsal available (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: using BOTsal (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 1.04.
The inversin suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that an adjustment of this
magnitude is motivated.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
Toste Tanhua,
Keil, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:47:43 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 0.96, but with large variability.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of 1.02.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that 06MT19920509 might be a bit
low in silicate, but with large variability.
Based on this, I suggest that no adjustment is done for silicate.
Toste Tanhua,
Kile, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:42:59 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1.10, and the inversion suggest an adjustment
of 0.9.
The cross-overs with the core cruises confirms that an adjustment of this
magnitude is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:37:05 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1, and the inversion suggest an adjustment of
1.02.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that no adjustment is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:33:28 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1, and the inversion suggest an adjustment of
-4.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that no adjustment is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:18:49 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all crossovers is -0.9.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -2.
The cross-overs with the core cruises confirms that no adjustment is necessary.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:15:02 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 22.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -22.
The cross overs with the core-cruises confirm these numbers.
Based on these evidence, I suggest an adjustment of -22.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 20080725

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:11:53 UTC - Edit - Delete

Druing the meeting in Paris it was decided that 06MT19920322 really was several
legs that deserved to be listed as different cruises (evident from, for
instance, salinity offsets).
The new cruises are now:
06MT19920701 NA+AMS
06MT19920509 NA
06MT19920316 NA
For the figures already uploaded to the website, they have all been moved to
06MT19920701, since this cruise covers both NA and AMS region, but be aware that
these plots can contain data from any of the 3 cruises listed above.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-22 09:38:17 UTC - Edit - Delete

Hide comments

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:16 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make 0.975. Average of xovers and
inversion suggestion (dens error?)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00 (not re-inspected
for GLODAPv2)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Data unacceptably noisy
(spread of >10% within profiles, scatter between profiles).

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Too few profiles (2?),
of too low precision to allow adjustment.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : Maintain 0. Very few profiles.
Can't clearly verify accuracy, but certainly not worse than +-4. Want to retain
due to early 1990 data being scarce.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain -0.020

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:56 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: only BOTsal available (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC - Edit - Delete

autogenerated: using BOTsal (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 1.04.
The inversin suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that an adjustment of this
magnitude is motivated.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
Toste Tanhua,
Keil, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:47:43 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 0.96, but with large variability.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of 1.02.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that 06MT19920509 might be a bit
low in silicate, but with large variability.
Based on this, I suggest that no adjustment is done for silicate.
Toste Tanhua,
Kile, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:42:59 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1.10, and the inversion suggest an adjustment
of 0.9.
The cross-overs with the core cruises confirms that an adjustment of this
magnitude is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:37:05 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1, and the inversion suggest an adjustment of
1.02.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that no adjustment is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:33:28 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross-overs is 1, and the inversion suggest an adjustment of
-4.
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms that no adjustment is motivated.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:18:49 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all crossovers is -0.9.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -2.
The cross-overs with the core cruises confirms that no adjustment is necessary.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel 2008-07-25

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:15:02 UTC - Edit - Delete

The average of all cross overs is 22.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -22.
The cross overs with the core-cruises confirm these numbers.
Based on these evidence, I suggest an adjustment of -22.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 20080725

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 11:11:53 UTC - Edit - Delete

Druing the meeting in Paris it was decided that 06MT19920322 really was several
legs that deserved to be listed as different cruises (evident from, for
instance, salinity offsets).
The new cruises are now:
06MT19920701 NA+AMS
06MT19920509 NA
06MT19920316 NA
For the figures already uploaded to the website, they have all been moved to
06MT19920701, since this cruise covers both NA and AMS region, but be aware that
these plots can contain data from any of the 3 cruises listed above.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-22 09:38:17 UTC - Edit - Delete

Hide comments