Cruise: 06MT19960910 (dataset:CARINA) Data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: 06MT0365; M36/5; 06MT19960910; 06MT0365; M36/5; M36-5
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment is a published version for GLODAPv2!
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
RC.png | [autogenerated from RC_Toste/adjustments!] |
View | |
RC_July08.png | [autogenerated from RC_Toste/adjustments!] |
View | |
manualXovers.png | [autogenerated from manual_xovers/adjustments!] |
View |
- no files! -
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
alkalinity:29
cruise:3
nitrate:30
oxygen:26
ph:6
phosphate:25
salinity:37
silicate:29
tco2:12
- no files! -
View 1 ReadMe(s) (Lists all ReadMes)
06MT19960910 - 2008-06-17 14:28:36 - version: 0Posted on 2008-06-17 14:28:36 - last updated on 2008-06-17 14:28:36 as version number 0
5/5/05 Initialized README file
Data from Kozyr via CARINA site 5/11/04
Updated carbon and salinity from Perez 9/18/06
Ship and cruise designation: Meteor; 06MT365
Reported as JGOFS cruise
Cruise dates: 9/10 - 10/3/1996
EXPOCODE: 06MT19960910
62 stations with 24 place Rosette
Chief Scientist: C. Hemleben
Hydro: Who - J. Waniek; Status - ???; S Plus - up to date
Notes: Pressure approximated from depth
2 salt values noted as odd, but flag not changed
Deep salt values are high relative to GLODAP by ~0.2!
Nuts/O2: Who - Lendt; Status - final; S Plus - up to date
Notes: Good data set
TCO2: Who - Perez, Mintrop; Status - final; S Plus - up to date
Notes: Calculated from pH25 and Alk
Data compare favorably with OACES-93
Updated values from Perez 9/18/06
TA: Who - Perez, Mintrop; Status - final; S Plus - up to date
Notes: CRM not used
Good data set
Updated values from Perez 9/18/06
pCO2: Who - Perez, Mintrop; Status - final; S Plus - up to date
Notes: Calculated from pH25 and Alk
pH25: Who - Perez, Mintrop; Status - final; S Plus - up to date
Notes: Ref. 25C; ??? scale
Good data set
Updated values from Perez 9/18/06
CFC: Who - ; Status - not measured; S Plus -
Notes:
C-14: Who - ; Status - not measured; S Plus -
Notes:
C-13: Who - ; Status - not measured; S Plus -
Notes:
H-3/He-3: Who - ; Status - not measured; S Plus -
Notes:
Other:
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Salt.Comparison.pdf | View | ||
unadjusted_06GA20000506_06MT19960910_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MM20060523_06MT19960910_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19920701_06MT19960910_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19941012_06MT19960910_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_06MT19970611_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_06MT20010717_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_06MT20030723_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_316N19961102_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_316N19970530_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_316N19971005_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_31AN19890420_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_32OC19880723_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_33MW19930704.1_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_33RO20030604_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_35TH20020611_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_35TH20040604_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_35TH20080610_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_35TH20100608_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_74AB19900528_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_74AB19910501_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_74DI19890511_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_74DI19890612_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_74DI19890716_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_74DI19900515_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_74DI19900612_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_74DI19980423_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_74DI20110715_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
xover_sum_06MT19960910_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 06MT19941012 / 06MT19960910!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/salinity!]; recovered copy |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 06MT19960910 / 317519930704!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/salinity!]; recovered copy |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 06GA20000506 / 06MT19960910!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/salinity!]; recovered copy |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 74DI19900515 / 06MT19960910!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/salinity!]; recovered copy |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 74DI19890716 / 06MT19960910!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/salinity!]; recovered copy |
View | |
XToste.eps | [Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 74DI19900515 / 06MT19960910!]; |
View | |
XToste.eps | [Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 74AB19910501 / 06MT19960910!]; |
View | |
XToste.eps | [Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 31AN19890420 / 06MT19960910!]; |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:16 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - salinity
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 0
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:57 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19960910/salinity: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: only BOTsal available (no CTDsal)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19960910/salinity: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using BOTsal (no CTDsal)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by ctd_salinity in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:16 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
TCO2.Comparison.pdf | View | ||
offset__tco2_stdr_plot_06MT19960910_62.png | IIM-CSIC inversions result plot |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of tco2 plot for crossover: 06MT19960910 / 35TH20020611!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/tco2!]; recovered copy |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of tco2 plot for crossover: 06MT19960910 / 317519930704!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/tco2!]; recovered copy |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of tco2 plot for crossover: 06MT19960910 / 33RO20030604!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/tco2!]; recovered copy |
View | |
X_pete_06MT19960910_317519930704_all_data_tco2.eps | [Copy of tco2 plot for crossover: 06MT19960910 / 317519930704!]; All data |
View | |
X_pete_06MT19960910_33RO20030604_all_data_tco2.eps | [Copy of tco2 plot for crossover: 06MT19960910 / 33RO20030604!]; All data |
View | |
X_pete_06MT0365_35TH0602.eps | [Copy of tco2 plot for crossover: 06MT19960910 / 35TH20020611!]; |
View | |
X_pete_06GA3501_06MT0365_tco2.eps | [Copy of tco2 plot for crossover: 06GA20000506 / 06MT19960910!]; |
View | |
XToste.eps | [Copy of tco2 plot for crossover: 74DI19980426 / 06MT19960910!]; |
View | |
X_pete_06MT19960910_317519930704_all_data_tco2.eps | [Copy of tco2 plot for crossover: 06MT19960910 / 317519930704!]; All data |
View |
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
06MT19960910_tco2.txt |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
Autogenerated comment - tCO2
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : Make -999. These DIC values were
calculated.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:57 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
Autogenerated comment - alkalinity
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -5. Obvious from many good
xovers
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:57 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19960910 - alkalinity
06MT19960910
alkalinity
There are 14 xovers. The fitted offset is -4.3. The suggested adjustment is 0
All residuals fits inside +-5, and generally close to 0
Very good fit with core-cruises.
Vigo 2008/06/09
Fiz Perez
Anton Velo
--
All xovers and output of inversions are refered on figure: "Report plot for
adjustments"
Real diff (Green dots) are the differences taken directly from xover routines.
The complete segment of error bar represents the xover standard deviation.
Yellow line stand for the offset calculated for this cruise.
Black stars stand for the offset calculated for the others cruises in the
xovers.
Blue squares stand for the Fitted differences that would be obtained from the
calculated offsets (Yellow line - black stars)
Red dots stand for the Residuals between the 'Real diff'(Green dots) and 'Fitted
diff' (Blue squares)
c suffix in the upper X axis labels stand for Core Cruises.
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2008-06-10 09:33:24 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
06MT19960910 - ph
Potentiometric pH. Kept in GLODAPv2 as it has been QCed as good, with low
scatter, and pH is needed to solve CO2 system (only TALK and pH measured)
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-11-27 12:08:03 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - phosphate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:57 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19960910 - ph
06MT19960910 62 702
pHSWS25
There are 12 xovers. The fitted offset is -0.007. The suggested adjustment is
-0.007
Except one, all residuals are very low and fits inside +-0.003.
Very good fit with 5 core cruises.
Vigo 2008/06/12
Fiz Perez
Anton Velo
--
All xovers and output of inversions are refered on figure: "Report plot for
adjustments"
Real diff (Green dots) are the differences taken directly from xover routines.
The complete segment of error bar represents the xover standard deviation.
Yellow line stand for the offset calculated for this cruise.
Black stars stand for the offset calculated for the others cruises in the
xovers.
Blue squares stand for the Fitted differences that would be obtained from the
calculated offsets (Yellow line - black stars)
Red dots stand for the Residuals between the 'Real diff'(Green dots) and 'Fitted
diff' (Blue squares)
c suffix in the upper X axis labels stand for Core Cruises.
d preffix in the upper X axis labels stand for pH determined with Alk and TCO2
using the CO2SYS routines and the Mehr'73 ctes fitted by Dick&Mill'87.
expocode ids in upper X axis stand for NA ids or SO_ids+10000 for avoiding
coincidences
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2008-06-12 19:01:35 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19960910 - phosphate
The average of all cross overs is 1.025 with large scatter, suggesting the
phospate values are OK, but on the high side.
The N/P ratio is 15.61, intercept -0.27.
The inversion suggest no adjustment.
Most of the cross-overs witht the core-cruises are close to 1 (within the
uncertainty).
Based on these evidence I suggest no adjustment.
Kiel, 2008.05.27
Toste Tanhua
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-04 21:09:40 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
unadjusted_06GA20000506_06MT19960910_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MM20060523_06MT19960910_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19941012_06MT19960910_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_06MT19970611_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_06MT20010717_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_06MT20030723_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_316N19961102_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_316N19970530_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_31AN19890420_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_32OC19880723_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_33MW19930704.1_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_33RO20030604_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_35TH20020611_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_35TH20040604_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_35TH20080610_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_35TH20100608_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_74AB19900528_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_74AB19910501_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_74DI19890612_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_74DI19890716_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_74DI19900612_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_74DI19980423_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
xover_sum_06MT19960910_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of nitrate plot for crossover: 06MT19960910 / 317519930704!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/nitrate!]; recovered copy |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of nitrate plot for crossover: 06GA20000506 / 06MT19960910!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/nitrate!]; recovered copy |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of nitrate plot for crossover: 74DI19980426 / 06MT19960910!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/nitrate!]; recovered copy |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of nitrate plot for crossover: 06MT19960910 / 35TH20020611!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/nitrate!]; recovered copy |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of nitrate plot for crossover: 06MT19960910 / 33RO20030604!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/nitrate!]; recovered copy |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of nitrate plot for crossover: 06MT19960910 / 64TR19900417!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/nitrate!]; recovered copy |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of nitrate plot for crossover: 06MT19941012 / 06MT19960910!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/nitrate!]; recovered copy |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
Autogenerated comment - nitrate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make 1.02. Clear 2% low bias
against accurate cruise MT20030723
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:57 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19960910 - nitrate
The average of all cross overs is 0.992, suggesting that the nitrate values are
OK.
The N/P ratio is 15.61, intercept -0.27.
The inversion suggest an upward adjustment of 1.04 and 1.05 for WLSQ and WDLSQ,
respectively.
Most of the cross-overs witht the core-cruises are close to 1 (within the
uncertainty).
Based on these evidence I suggest no adjustment.
Kiel, 2008.05.27
Toste Tanhua
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-04 21:04:24 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
unadjusted_06GA20000506_06MT19960910_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19941012_06MT19960910_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_06MT19970611_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_06MT20010717_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_06MT20030723_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_316N19961102_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_316N19970530_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_31AN19890420_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_32OC19880723_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_33MW19930704.1_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_33RO20030604_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_35TH20020611_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_35TH20040604_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_74AB19900528_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_74AB19910501_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_74DI19890716_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_74DI19900612_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_74DI19980423_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
xover_sum_06MT19960910_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of phosphate plot for crossover: 06MT19960910 / 317519930704!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/ph!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of phosphate plot for crossover: 06MT19960910 / 06MT20030723!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/ph!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of phosphate plot for crossover: 06GA20000506 / 06MT19960910!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/ph!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of phosphate plot for crossover: 06MT19960910 / 33RO20030604!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/phosphate!]; recovered copy |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of phosphate plot for crossover: 74DI19980426 / 06MT19960910!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/phosphate!]; recovered copy |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of phosphate plot for crossover: 06MT19941012 / 06MT19960910!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/phosphate!]; recovered copy |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
Autogenerated comment - phosphate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:57 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19960910 - phosphate
The average of all cross overs is 1.025 with large scatter, suggesting the
phospate values are OK, but on the high side.
The N/P ratio is 15.61, intercept -0.27.
The inversion suggest no adjustment.
Most of the cross-overs witht the core-cruises are close to 1 (within the
uncertainty).
Based on these evidence I suggest no adjustment.
Kiel, 2008.05.27
Toste Tanhua
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-04 21:09:40 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
unadjusted_06GA20000506_06MT19960910_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MM20060523_06MT19960910_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19941012_06MT19960910_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_06MT19970611_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_06MT20010717_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_06MT20030723_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_316N19961102_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_316N19970530_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_31AN19890420_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_32OC19880723_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_33MW19930704.1_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_33RO20030604_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_35TH20020611_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_35TH20040604_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_35TH20080610_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_35TH20100608_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_74AB19900528_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_74AB19910501_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_74DI19890612_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_74DI19890716_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_74DI19900612_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_06MT19960910_74DI19980423_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
xover_sum_06MT19960910_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 06MT19960910 / 06MT20030723!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/silicate!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 06MT19960910!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/silicate!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 74DI19980426 / 06MT19960910!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/silicate!]; recovered copy |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 06MT19960910 / 317519930704!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/silicate!]; recovered copy |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 06MT19960910 / 33RO20030604!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/silicate!]; recovered copy |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 06MT19960910 / 64TR19900417!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/silicate!]; recovered copy |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
Autogenerated comment - silicate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make 1.06. Clearly 6% low against
RO2003. Inversion also thinks 1.062
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:57 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19960910 - silicate
Silicate: The average of all crossovers is 0.95 (with large scatter) and the
inversions suggest an upward adjustment of 1.05, suggesting the silicate values
are too low. The crossovers with the core-cruises confirms an upward correction.
Based on these evidence an adjustment of 1.05, was applied to the silicate data.
(posted by Carsten Schirnick on behalf of Toste Tanhua)
Posted by cschirnick@geomar.de on 2008-11-11 09:27:56 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19960910 - silicate
The average of all cross overs is 0.96 with large scatter, suggesting the
silicate values are on the low side
The inversions sugest an upward adjustment of 1.09 and 1.10 (WLSQ and WDLSQ,
respectively).
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms an adjustment.
Based on these evidence I suggest an adjustment of 1.09, i.e. the more
conservative of the two inversions.
Kiel, 2008.05.27
Toste Tanhua
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-04 21:13:05 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:16 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - oxygen
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : Maintain 0.985, that's the
inversion suggestion. This cruise is clearly 2.5% high against the three highly
precise and fairly accurate (maybe 0.5% high?) Knorr cruises in 1996/1997 and
33MW1993.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:57 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19960910/oxygen: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19960910/oxygen: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19960910 - oxygen
The average of all cross-overs is 1.027 but with three cruises with poor data
that bias the result. Without these two cruises the average would be 1.014
revealing that this cruise is still bit higher in oxygen.
The inversion suggests an adjustment of 0.985 (WDLSQ) and 0.981 (WLSQ).
The offsets with core cruise seems to confirm the adjustment, but to note that
the mid depth data suggest no adjustment.
In this case I suggest an adjustment consistent with the inversion also to
ensure consistency with the cruise 06MT19960613.
Zürich, 2008.06.11
Ilaria Stendardo
Posted by ilaria.stendardo@env.ethz.ch on 2008-06-11 11:23:34 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by ctd_oxygen in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:16 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 20 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
06MT19960910 - ph
Potentiometric pH. Kept in GLODAPv2 as it has been QCed as good, with low
scatter, and pH is needed to solve CO2 system (only TALK and pH measured)
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-11-27 12:08:03 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:16 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - oxygen
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : Maintain 0.985, that's the
inversion suggestion. This cruise is clearly 2.5% high against the three highly
precise and fairly accurate (maybe 0.5% high?) Knorr cruises in 1996/1997 and
33MW1993.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:57 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - silicate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make 1.06. Clearly 6% low against
RO2003. Inversion also thinks 1.062
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:57 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - phosphate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:57 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - nitrate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make 1.02. Clear 2% low bias
against accurate cruise MT20030723
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:57 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - alkalinity
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -5. Obvious from many good
xovers
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:57 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - tCO2
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : Make -999. These DIC values were
calculated.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:57 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - salinity
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 0
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:57 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19960910/oxygen: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19960910/salinity: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: only BOTsal available (no CTDsal)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:38 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19960910/oxygen: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19960910/salinity: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using BOTsal (no CTDsal)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:11 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19960910 - silicate
Silicate: The average of all crossovers is 0.95 (with large scatter) and the
inversions suggest an upward adjustment of 1.05, suggesting the silicate values
are too low. The crossovers with the core-cruises confirms an upward correction.
Based on these evidence an adjustment of 1.05, was applied to the silicate data.
(posted by Carsten Schirnick on behalf of Toste Tanhua)
Posted by cschirnick@geomar.de on 2008-11-11 09:27:56 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19960910 - ph
06MT19960910 62 702
pHSWS25
There are 12 xovers. The fitted offset is -0.007. The suggested adjustment is
-0.007
Except one, all residuals are very low and fits inside +-0.003.
Very good fit with 5 core cruises.
Vigo 2008/06/12
Fiz Perez
Anton Velo
--
All xovers and output of inversions are refered on figure: "Report plot for
adjustments"
Real diff (Green dots) are the differences taken directly from xover routines.
The complete segment of error bar represents the xover standard deviation.
Yellow line stand for the offset calculated for this cruise.
Black stars stand for the offset calculated for the others cruises in the
xovers.
Blue squares stand for the Fitted differences that would be obtained from the
calculated offsets (Yellow line - black stars)
Red dots stand for the Residuals between the 'Real diff'(Green dots) and 'Fitted
diff' (Blue squares)
c suffix in the upper X axis labels stand for Core Cruises.
d preffix in the upper X axis labels stand for pH determined with Alk and TCO2
using the CO2SYS routines and the Mehr'73 ctes fitted by Dick&Mill'87.
expocode ids in upper X axis stand for NA ids or SO_ids+10000 for avoiding
coincidences
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2008-06-12 19:01:35 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19960910 - oxygen
The average of all cross-overs is 1.027 but with three cruises with poor data
that bias the result. Without these two cruises the average would be 1.014
revealing that this cruise is still bit higher in oxygen.
The inversion suggests an adjustment of 0.985 (WDLSQ) and 0.981 (WLSQ).
The offsets with core cruise seems to confirm the adjustment, but to note that
the mid depth data suggest no adjustment.
In this case I suggest an adjustment consistent with the inversion also to
ensure consistency with the cruise 06MT19960613.
Zürich, 2008.06.11
Ilaria Stendardo
Posted by ilaria.stendardo@env.ethz.ch on 2008-06-11 11:23:34 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19960910 - alkalinity
06MT19960910
alkalinity
There are 14 xovers. The fitted offset is -4.3. The suggested adjustment is 0
All residuals fits inside +-5, and generally close to 0
Very good fit with core-cruises.
Vigo 2008/06/09
Fiz Perez
Anton Velo
--
All xovers and output of inversions are refered on figure: "Report plot for
adjustments"
Real diff (Green dots) are the differences taken directly from xover routines.
The complete segment of error bar represents the xover standard deviation.
Yellow line stand for the offset calculated for this cruise.
Black stars stand for the offset calculated for the others cruises in the
xovers.
Blue squares stand for the Fitted differences that would be obtained from the
calculated offsets (Yellow line - black stars)
Red dots stand for the Residuals between the 'Real diff'(Green dots) and 'Fitted
diff' (Blue squares)
c suffix in the upper X axis labels stand for Core Cruises.
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2008-06-10 09:33:24 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19960910 - silicate
The average of all cross overs is 0.96 with large scatter, suggesting the
silicate values are on the low side
The inversions sugest an upward adjustment of 1.09 and 1.10 (WLSQ and WDLSQ,
respectively).
The cross-overs with the core-cruises confirms an adjustment.
Based on these evidence I suggest an adjustment of 1.09, i.e. the more
conservative of the two inversions.
Kiel, 2008.05.27
Toste Tanhua
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-04 21:13:05 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19960910 - phosphate
The average of all cross overs is 1.025 with large scatter, suggesting the
phospate values are OK, but on the high side.
The N/P ratio is 15.61, intercept -0.27.
The inversion suggest no adjustment.
Most of the cross-overs witht the core-cruises are close to 1 (within the
uncertainty).
Based on these evidence I suggest no adjustment.
Kiel, 2008.05.27
Toste Tanhua
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-04 21:09:40 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19960910 - nitrate
The average of all cross overs is 0.992, suggesting that the nitrate values are
OK.
The N/P ratio is 15.61, intercept -0.27.
The inversion suggest an upward adjustment of 1.04 and 1.05 for WLSQ and WDLSQ,
respectively.
Most of the cross-overs witht the core-cruises are close to 1 (within the
uncertainty).
Based on these evidence I suggest no adjustment.
Kiel, 2008.05.27
Toste Tanhua
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-04 21:04:24 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Hide comments