GLODAPv2 Adjustments

Stations:	[1-last]
The selected Calculated Carbon Parameter has been dismissed in October 2017! Legacy values will be exported as is and displayed in red with subscript "c", e.g. -0.123456_c! No data available? Insert -999 No suggestion for adjustment possible? Insert -888 To calibrate CTDsal use: CTDsal_calibrated = (CTDsal - CTDsal_intercept) / CTDsal_slope To calibrate CTDoxy use: CTDoxy_calibrated = (CTDoxy - CTDoxy_intercept) / CTDoxy_slope
Insert your commit message below explaining your change(s) before you save…
Salinity [+]
CTD-Sal. [+] slope/intercept - action [ID]	/ - #
TCO₂ [+]
Alkalinity [+]
pH [+]
pCO₂ [+]
Nitrate [x]
Phosphate [x]
Silicate [x]
Oxygen [x]
CTD-Oxyg. [x] slope/intercept - action [ID]	/ - #
CFC12 [x]
CFC11 [x]
CFC113 [x]
CCl4 [x]
C13 [+]
SF6 [x]

Cruise Info

Annotations for this cruise:

View 0 annotation(s) (Lists all annotations)

Files for Adjustment Plot files re. Cruise:

Filename:	Comment:	Action…
offsets.png	[autogenerated from RC_Toste/adjustments!]	View

Data files re. Cruise: - no files! -

Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
alkalinity:11 cruise:1 nitrate:20 oxygen:20 phosphate:19 salinity:20 silicate:20 tco2:14

Plot files re. Cluster: - no files! -

Comments re. this cruise in GLODAPv2

View 32 comment(s) (Lists all comments)

09AR19941213 - ph

Changed adjustment to -999 as there are not measured pH data, only calculated
one

Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-11-04 08:19:52 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:15 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213/oxygen: update slope+intercept

autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:43 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213/salinity: update slope+intercept

autogenerated: only BOTsal available (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:43 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - oxygen

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:31 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - silicate

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 1.04. Full SO
inversion shows this to maximize consistency. Also

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:31 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - phosphate

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:31 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - nitrate

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:31 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - alkalinity

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:31 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - tCO2

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:31 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - salinity

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:31 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213 - silicate

Set to 1.04, which maximizes consistency in a full circumpolar inversion.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-04-22 14:50:39 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213/oxygen: init slope+intercept

autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:14 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213/salinity: init slope+intercept

autogenerated: using BOTsal (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:14 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213 - cfc11

Good relationship between CFC11 and CFC12, and consistent surface saturations.
Thus no adjustment is recommended.

Posted by emje@norceresearch.no on 2013-01-04 15:07:28 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213 - cfc12

Good relationship between CFC11 and CFC12, and consistent surface saturations.
Thus no adjustment is recommended.

Posted by emje@norceresearch.no on 2013-01-04 15:07:19 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213 - silicate

Revised to CARINA suggested correction as this is based on 14 crossovers, and
quite convincing.

Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-11-12 13:49:10 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213 - salinity

The inversion suggest a correction of -1.5 ppm, and the mean of the crossovers
is 2.1 ppm. This is below the 5 ppm threshold.
No adjustment needed.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-17 15:39:26 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213 - oxygen

The inversion suggest a correction of 0.992 and the mean of the crossovers is
1.001.
No adjustment needed for this cruise.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-17 15:37:40 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213 - silicate

The inversion suggest a correction of 1.08, and the mean of the two cross-overs
is 0.921. It is clear that the silicate values is lower than that of the two
other cruises in this area contained within GLODAP (320619960503 and
316N199411201). CARINA suggest an adjustment of 1.03.

We suggest an adjustment of 1.08, in line with the inversion and the crossovers.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-17 15:36:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213 - phosphate

The inversion suggest a correction of 1.01, and the mean of the crossovers is
0.993.
No adjustment needed.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-17 15:33:20 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213 - nitrate

The inversion suggest a correction of 0.99 and the mean of the crossovers is
1.004
No adjustment needed

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-17 15:31:34 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213 - alkalinity

The inversion suggest an adjustment of 4 uml/kg, but the average of the two
crossovers is -1.7. This is below the 6 umol/kg threshold.
No adjustment needed.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-17 15:29:34 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213 - tco2

The inversion suggest an adjustment of 2.8, and the mean of the two crossovers
is -1.1. This is clearly below the 4 umol/kg threshold.
No adjustment needed.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-17 15:26:30 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

No subject

These cruise was not considered at all by GLODAP, and no adjustments were
applied.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-17 15:23:22 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213 - oxygen

GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 0.993.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests no significant adjustment (0.999
+/-0.006).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
13 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is 0.997
(+/-0.021).
6 cross overs show no significant differences (<1%) and involve cruises that are
thought to have no significant offset in oxygen. When the offsets suggested for
the other cruises are taken into account, the average of all cross overs is
0.998 (+/-0.003). This suggests that no adjustment would be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses agree.
Based on this I suggest no adjustment for oxygen.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco

Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-27 11:11:17 UTC for data product: CARINA

09AR19941213 - silicate

GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 0.982.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests that an adjustment of 1.05 could be
required (1.049 +/-0.026).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
13 cross overs were analyzed, but 2 are discarded due to large uncertainty (with
cruises 320619960503 and 316N19941201). The average of the 11 cross overs is
0.991 (+/-0.050).
All cross overs show significant differences ranging from 1.033 to 1.0.129 and
none of them involve cruises that are thought to have no significant offset in
silicate. When the suggested offsets are taken into account, the average of the
11 cross overs is 0.968 (+/-0.003). This suggests that an adjustment of 1.03
could be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses suggest low silicate values, but different
adjustments are proposed: 1.05 or 1.03, respectively. The lower adjustment is
preferred because of the large uncertainty associated with the global inversion.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 1.03 for silicate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco

Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-27 11:10:59 UTC for data product: CARINA

09AR19941213 - phosphate

GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 1.022.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests that an adjustment of 1.03 could be
required (1.026 +/-0.023).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
12 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is 1.024
(+/-0.050).
4 cross overs show no significant differences (<2%) and 3 of them involve
cruises that are thought to have no significant offset in phosphate. When the
offsets suggested for the other cruises are taken into account, the average of
all cross overs is 1.014 (+/-0.017).
The large scatter around the mean is due to the 3 cross overs found between
110°E-120°E that show an average of 0.987 (+/-0.006), whereas the 9 cross overs
found between 130°E-150°E show an average of 1.023 (+/-0.005).
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses disagree. The global inversion suggests that an
adjustment 1.03 could be required, which is not coherent with the PI’s
recommendation for no change (Bronte Tilbrook, personal communication). The
regional analysis shows different offsets between 110°E-120°E and between
130°E-150°E suggesting no adjustment or a small adjustment (0.98), respectively.
Given the large uncertainty associated with the analyses above, I suggest no
adjustment for phosphate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco

Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-27 11:10:38 UTC for data product: CARINA

09AR19941213 - nitrate

GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 0.998.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests no significant adjustment (1.004
+/-0.013).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
13 cross overs were analyzed. The average of the 4 considered cross overs is
1.000 (+/-0.022).
9 cross overs show no significant differences (<2%) and involve cruises that are
thought to have no significant offset in nitrate. When the offsets suggested for
the other cruises are taken into account, the average of all cross overs is
0.999 (+/-0.007). This suggests that no adjustment would be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses agree.
Based on this I suggest no adjustment for nitrate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco

Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-27 11:10:20 UTC for data product: CARINA

09AR19941213 - alkalinity

GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is -8.8 umol/kg.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests that a small adjustment could be required
(+4.8 +/-2.5 umol/kg).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
6 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is -6.3 (+/-7.9)
umol/kg.
3 cross overs show no significant differences (<5 umol/kg) and involve cruises
that are thought to have no significant offset in alkalinity. When the offsets
suggested for the other cruises are taken into account, the average of all cross
overs is +2.4 (+/-2.7) umol/kg. This suggests that no adjustment would be
required.
However, it should be noted that different results were obtained depending on
longitudes: slightly larger offsets are obtained from the 4 cross overs found
between 130°E-150°E with an average of +4.1 (+/-1.4) umol/kg, compared to the 2
cross overs found between 110°E-120°E showing no significant differences with
cruises that are thought to have no significant offset in alkalinity.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses disagree, but only small corrections are
suggested. The global inversion suggests that an adjustment of +5 umol/kg could
be required, which is not coherent with the PI’s recommendation to decrease
alkalinity by 4.6 umol/kg (Bronte Tilbrook, personal communication). The latter
adjustment is coherent with the regional analysis that suggests an adjustment of
about -4 umol/kg for data collected between 130°E-150°E, while no adjustment
would be required for data collected between 110°E-120°E.
Based on this I suggest no adjustment for alkalinity.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco

Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-27 11:09:03 UTC for data product: CARINA

09AR19941213 - tco2

GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is -4.0 umol/kg.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests no significant adjustment (+1.4 +/-1.9
umol/kg).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
9 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is -2.2 (+/-6.7)
umol/kg.
All cross overs but 1 show no significant differences (<4 umol/kg) and involve
cruises that are thought to have no significant offset in TCO2. When the offset
suggested for the cruise 35MF20030123 is taken into account, the average of all
cross overs is -0.6 (+/-2.1) umol/kg. This suggests that no adjustment would be
required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses agree.
Based on this I suggest no adjustment for TCO2.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco

Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-27 11:07:06 UTC for data product: CARINA

09AR19941213 - salinity

GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is +1.1 ppm.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests no significant adjustment (-3.2 +/-6.5
ppm).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
13 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is +0.1 (+/-3.7)
ppm.
2 cross overs show significant differences (>5 ppm), but they involve cruises
that are thought to have significant offsets in salinity. When the suggested
offsets are taken into account, the average of all cross overs is +1.1 (+/-2.3)
ppm. This suggests that no adjustment would be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses agree.
Based on this I suggest no adjustment for salinity.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco

Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-27 11:06:46 UTC for data product: CARINA

Hide comments

View other postings and files re. this adjustment

ReadMe file(s) for this cruise

View 0 ReadMe(s) (Lists all ReadMes)

Files and Comments for salinity

Files

Plot files re. Salinity
[+]:

Filename:	Comment:	Action…
unadjusted_09AR19910925_09AR19941213_SAL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR19930404_SAL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR19960822_SAL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR19980228_SAL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20011029_SAL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20041223_SAL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20071216_SAL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20080322_SAL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20110104_SAL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20120105_SAL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_316N19941201_SAL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_320619960503_SAL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_49HH19941213_SAL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_49HH20011127_SAL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_61TG20020206_SAL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_61TG20030217_SAL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_90KD19920214_SAL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!]	View
xover_sum_09AR19941213_SAL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 09AR19941213 / 320619960503!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/salinity!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 09AR19941213 / 316N19941201!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/salinity!]	View

Data files re. Salinity
[+]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:15 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213/salinity: update slope+intercept

autogenerated: only BOTsal available (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:43 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - salinity

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:31 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213/salinity: init slope+intercept

autogenerated: using BOTsal (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:14 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213 - salinity

The inversion suggest a correction of -1.5 ppm, and the mean of the crossovers
is 2.1 ppm. This is below the 5 ppm threshold.
No adjustment needed.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-17 15:39:26 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213 - salinity

GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is +1.1 ppm.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests no significant adjustment (-3.2 +/-6.5
ppm).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
13 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is +0.1 (+/-3.7)
ppm.
2 cross overs show significant differences (>5 ppm), but they involve cruises
that are thought to have significant offsets in salinity. When the suggested
offsets are taken into account, the average of all cross overs is +1.1 (+/-2.3)
ppm. This suggests that no adjustment would be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses agree.
Based on this I suggest no adjustment for salinity.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco

Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-27 11:06:46 UTC for data product: CARINA

Hide comments

Files and Comments for ctd_salinity

Files

Plot files re. CTD-Sal. [+]
adj. - slope/intercept - action [ID]: - no files! -

Data files re. CTD-Sal. [+]
adj. - slope/intercept - action [ID]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by ctd_salinity in subject)

Files and Comments for tco2

Files

Plot files re. TCO₂
[+]:

Filename:	Comment:	Action…
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR19930404_DIC.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR19960822_DIC.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR19980228_DIC.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20011029_DIC.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20041223_DIC.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20080322_DIC.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_316N19941201_DIC.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_320619960503_DIC.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_49HH19941213_DIC.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_61TG20020206_DIC.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_90KD19920214_DIC.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!]	View
xover_sum_09AR19941213_DIC.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of tco2 plot for crossover: 09AR19941213 / 320619960503!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/tco2!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of tco2 plot for crossover: 09AR19941213 / 316N19941201!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/tco2!]	View

Data files re. TCO₂
[+]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)

Files and Comments for alkalinity

Files

Plot files re. Alkalinity
[+]:

Filename:	Comment:	Action…
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR19960822_ALK.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/alkalinity!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR19980228_ALK.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/alkalinity!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20011029_ALK.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/alkalinity!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20041223_ALK.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/alkalinity!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20080322_ALK.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/alkalinity!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_316N19941201_ALK.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/alkalinity!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_320619960503_ALK.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/alkalinity!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_49HH19941213_ALK.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/alkalinity!]	View
xover_sum_09AR19941213_ALK.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/alkalinity!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of alkalinity plot for crossover: 09AR19941213 / 320619960503!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/alkalinity!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of alkalinity plot for crossover: 09AR19941213 / 316N19941201!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/alkalinity!]	View

Data files re. Alkalinity
[+]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)

Autogenerated comment - alkalinity

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:31 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213 - alkalinity

The inversion suggest an adjustment of 4 uml/kg, but the average of the two
crossovers is -1.7. This is below the 6 umol/kg threshold.
No adjustment needed.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-17 15:29:34 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213 - alkalinity

GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is -8.8 umol/kg.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests that a small adjustment could be required
(+4.8 +/-2.5 umol/kg).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
6 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is -6.3 (+/-7.9)
umol/kg.
3 cross overs show no significant differences (<5 umol/kg) and involve cruises
that are thought to have no significant offset in alkalinity. When the offsets
suggested for the other cruises are taken into account, the average of all cross
overs is +2.4 (+/-2.7) umol/kg. This suggests that no adjustment would be
required.
However, it should be noted that different results were obtained depending on
longitudes: slightly larger offsets are obtained from the 4 cross overs found
between 130°E-150°E with an average of +4.1 (+/-1.4) umol/kg, compared to the 2
cross overs found between 110°E-120°E showing no significant differences with
cruises that are thought to have no significant offset in alkalinity.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses disagree, but only small corrections are
suggested. The global inversion suggests that an adjustment of +5 umol/kg could
be required, which is not coherent with the PI’s recommendation to decrease
alkalinity by 4.6 umol/kg (Bronte Tilbrook, personal communication). The latter
adjustment is coherent with the regional analysis that suggests an adjustment of
about -4 umol/kg for data collected between 130°E-150°E, while no adjustment
would be required for data collected between 110°E-120°E.
Based on this I suggest no adjustment for alkalinity.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco

Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-27 11:09:03 UTC for data product: CARINA

Hide comments

Files and Comments for ph

Files

Plot files re. pH
[+]: - no files! -

Data files re. pH
[+]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)

09AR19941213 - ph

Changed adjustment to -999 as there are not measured pH data, only calculated
one

Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-11-04 08:19:52 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - phosphate

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:31 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213 - phosphate

The inversion suggest a correction of 1.01, and the mean of the crossovers is
0.993.
No adjustment needed.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-17 15:33:20 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213 - phosphate

GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 1.022.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests that an adjustment of 1.03 could be
required (1.026 +/-0.023).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
12 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is 1.024
(+/-0.050).
4 cross overs show no significant differences (<2%) and 3 of them involve
cruises that are thought to have no significant offset in phosphate. When the
offsets suggested for the other cruises are taken into account, the average of
all cross overs is 1.014 (+/-0.017).
The large scatter around the mean is due to the 3 cross overs found between
110°E-120°E that show an average of 0.987 (+/-0.006), whereas the 9 cross overs
found between 130°E-150°E show an average of 1.023 (+/-0.005).
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses disagree. The global inversion suggests that an
adjustment 1.03 could be required, which is not coherent with the PI’s
recommendation for no change (Bronte Tilbrook, personal communication). The
regional analysis shows different offsets between 110°E-120°E and between
130°E-150°E suggesting no adjustment or a small adjustment (0.98), respectively.
Given the large uncertainty associated with the analyses above, I suggest no
adjustment for phosphate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco

Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-27 11:10:38 UTC for data product: CARINA

Hide comments

Files and Comments for pco2

Files

Plot files re. pCO₂
[+]: - no files! -

Data files re. pCO₂
[+]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by pco2 in subject)

Files and Comments for nitrate

Files

Plot files re. Nitrate
[x]:

Filename:	Comment:	Action…
unadjusted_09AR19910925_09AR19941213_NO3.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR19930404_NO3.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR19960822_NO3.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR19980228_NO3.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20011029_NO3.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20041223_NO3.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20071216_NO3.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20080322_NO3.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20110104_NO3.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20120105_NO3.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_316N19941201_NO3.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_320619960503_NO3.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_49HH19941213_NO3.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_49HH20011127_NO3.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_61TG20020206_NO3.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_61TG20030217_NO3.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_90KD19920214_NO3.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!]	View
xover_sum_09AR19941213_NO3.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of nitrate plot for crossover: 09AR19941213 / 320619960503!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/nitrate!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of nitrate plot for crossover: 09AR19941213 / 316N19941201!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/nitrate!]	View

Data files re. Nitrate
[x]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)

Files and Comments for phosphate

Files

Plot files re. Phosphate
[x]:

Filename:	Comment:	Action…
unadjusted_09AR19910925_09AR19941213_PO4.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR19930404_PO4.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR19960822_PO4.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR19980228_PO4.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20011029_PO4.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20041223_PO4.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20071216_PO4.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20080322_PO4.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20110104_PO4.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20120105_PO4.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_316N19941201_PO4.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_320619960503_PO4.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_49HH19941213_PO4.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_49HH20011127_PO4.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_61TG20020206_PO4.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_90KD19920214_PO4.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!]	View
xover_sum_09AR19941213_PO4.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of phosphate plot for crossover: 09AR19941213 / 320619960503!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/phosphate!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of phosphate plot for crossover: 09AR19941213 / 316N19941201!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/phosphate!]	View

Data files re. Phosphate
[x]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)

Autogenerated comment - phosphate

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:31 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213 - phosphate

The inversion suggest a correction of 1.01, and the mean of the crossovers is
0.993.
No adjustment needed.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-17 15:33:20 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213 - phosphate

GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 1.022.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests that an adjustment of 1.03 could be
required (1.026 +/-0.023).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
12 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is 1.024
(+/-0.050).
4 cross overs show no significant differences (<2%) and 3 of them involve
cruises that are thought to have no significant offset in phosphate. When the
offsets suggested for the other cruises are taken into account, the average of
all cross overs is 1.014 (+/-0.017).
The large scatter around the mean is due to the 3 cross overs found between
110°E-120°E that show an average of 0.987 (+/-0.006), whereas the 9 cross overs
found between 130°E-150°E show an average of 1.023 (+/-0.005).
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses disagree. The global inversion suggests that an
adjustment 1.03 could be required, which is not coherent with the PI’s
recommendation for no change (Bronte Tilbrook, personal communication). The
regional analysis shows different offsets between 110°E-120°E and between
130°E-150°E suggesting no adjustment or a small adjustment (0.98), respectively.
Given the large uncertainty associated with the analyses above, I suggest no
adjustment for phosphate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco

Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-27 11:10:38 UTC for data product: CARINA

Hide comments

Files and Comments for silicate

Files

Plot files re. Silicate
[x]:

Filename:	Comment:	Action…
unadjusted_09AR19910925_09AR19941213_SIL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR19930404_SIL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR19960822_SIL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR19980228_SIL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20011029_SIL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20041223_SIL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20071216_SIL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20080322_SIL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20110104_SIL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20120105_SIL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_316N19941201_SIL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_320619960503_SIL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_49HH19941213_SIL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_49HH20011127_SIL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_61TG20020206_SIL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_61TG20030217_SIL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_90KD19920214_SIL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!]	View
xover_sum_09AR19941213_SIL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 09AR19941213 / 320619960503!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/silicate!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 09AR19941213 / 316N19941201!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/silicate!]	View

Data files re. Silicate
[x]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)

Autogenerated comment - silicate

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 1.04. Full SO
inversion shows this to maximize consistency. Also

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:31 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213 - silicate

Set to 1.04, which maximizes consistency in a full circumpolar inversion.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-04-22 14:50:39 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213 - silicate

Revised to CARINA suggested correction as this is based on 14 crossovers, and
quite convincing.

Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-11-12 13:49:10 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213 - silicate

The inversion suggest a correction of 1.08, and the mean of the two cross-overs
is 0.921. It is clear that the silicate values is lower than that of the two
other cruises in this area contained within GLODAP (320619960503 and
316N199411201). CARINA suggest an adjustment of 1.03.

We suggest an adjustment of 1.08, in line with the inversion and the crossovers.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-17 15:36:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213 - silicate

GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 0.982.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests that an adjustment of 1.05 could be
required (1.049 +/-0.026).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
13 cross overs were analyzed, but 2 are discarded due to large uncertainty (with
cruises 320619960503 and 316N19941201). The average of the 11 cross overs is
0.991 (+/-0.050).
All cross overs show significant differences ranging from 1.033 to 1.0.129 and
none of them involve cruises that are thought to have no significant offset in
silicate. When the suggested offsets are taken into account, the average of the
11 cross overs is 0.968 (+/-0.003). This suggests that an adjustment of 1.03
could be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses suggest low silicate values, but different
adjustments are proposed: 1.05 or 1.03, respectively. The lower adjustment is
preferred because of the large uncertainty associated with the global inversion.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 1.03 for silicate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco

Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-27 11:10:59 UTC for data product: CARINA

Hide comments

Files and Comments for oxygen

Files

Plot files re. Oxygen
[x]:

Filename:	Comment:	Action…
unadjusted_09AR19910925_09AR19941213_O2.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR19930404_O2.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR19960822_O2.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR19980228_O2.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20011029_O2.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20041223_O2.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20071216_O2.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20080322_O2.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20110104_O2.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20120105_O2.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_316N19941201_O2.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_320619960503_O2.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_49HH19941213_O2.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_49HH20011127_O2.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_61TG20020206_O2.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_61TG20030217_O2.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!]	View
unadjusted_09AR19941213_90KD19920214_O2.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!]	View
xover_sum_09AR19941213_O2.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of oxygen plot for crossover: 09AR19941213 / 320619960503!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/oxygen!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of oxygen plot for crossover: 09AR19941213 / 316N19941201!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/oxygen!]	View

Data files re. Oxygen
[x]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:15 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213/oxygen: update slope+intercept

autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:43 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - oxygen

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:31 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213/oxygen: init slope+intercept

autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:14 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213 - oxygen

The inversion suggest a correction of 0.992 and the mean of the crossovers is
1.001.
No adjustment needed for this cruise.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-17 15:37:40 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

09AR19941213 - oxygen

GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 0.993.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests no significant adjustment (0.999
+/-0.006).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
13 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is 0.997
(+/-0.021).
6 cross overs show no significant differences (<1%) and involve cruises that are
thought to have no significant offset in oxygen. When the offsets suggested for
the other cruises are taken into account, the average of all cross overs is
0.998 (+/-0.003). This suggests that no adjustment would be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses agree.
Based on this I suggest no adjustment for oxygen.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco

Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-27 11:11:17 UTC for data product: CARINA

Hide comments

Files and Comments for ctd_oxygen

Files

Plot files re. CTD-Oxyg. [x]
adj. - slope/intercept - action [ID]: - no files! -

Data files re. CTD-Oxyg. [x]
adj. - slope/intercept - action [ID]: - no files! -

Dataproduct: GLODAPv2 :: Adjustments

Cruise: 09AR19941213 (dataset:CARINA) Data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023 Predecessor: CARINA

Please wait while loading list of related files…

09AR19941213 - ph

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

09AR19941213/oxygen: update slope+intercept

09AR19941213/salinity: update slope+intercept

Autogenerated comment - oxygen

Autogenerated comment - silicate

Autogenerated comment - phosphate

Autogenerated comment - nitrate

Autogenerated comment - alkalinity

Autogenerated comment - tCO2

Autogenerated comment - salinity

09AR19941213 - silicate

09AR19941213/oxygen: init slope+intercept

09AR19941213/salinity: init slope+intercept

09AR19941213 - cfc11

09AR19941213 - cfc12

09AR19941213 - silicate

09AR19941213 - salinity

09AR19941213 - oxygen

09AR19941213 - silicate

09AR19941213 - phosphate

09AR19941213 - nitrate

09AR19941213 - alkalinity

09AR19941213 - tco2

No subject

09AR19941213 - oxygen

09AR19941213 - silicate

09AR19941213 - phosphate

09AR19941213 - nitrate

09AR19941213 - alkalinity

09AR19941213 - tco2

09AR19941213 - salinity

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

09AR19941213/salinity: update slope+intercept

Autogenerated comment - salinity

09AR19941213/salinity: init slope+intercept

09AR19941213 - salinity

09AR19941213 - salinity

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

Autogenerated comment - tCO2

09AR19941213 - tco2

09AR19941213 - tco2

Autogenerated comment - alkalinity

09AR19941213 - alkalinity

09AR19941213 - alkalinity

09AR19941213 - ph

Autogenerated comment - phosphate

09AR19941213 - phosphate

09AR19941213 - phosphate

Autogenerated comment - nitrate

09AR19941213 - nitrate

09AR19941213 - nitrate

Autogenerated comment - phosphate

09AR19941213 - phosphate

09AR19941213 - phosphate

Autogenerated comment - silicate

09AR19941213 - silicate

09AR19941213 - silicate

09AR19941213 - silicate

09AR19941213 - silicate

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

09AR19941213/oxygen: update slope+intercept

Autogenerated comment - oxygen

09AR19941213/oxygen: init slope+intercept

09AR19941213 - oxygen

09AR19941213 - oxygen

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

09AR19941213 - cfc12

09AR19941213 - cfc11