Cruise: 09AR20011029 (dataset:CARINA) Data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: WOCE SR03_2001b; 09AR20011029; WOCE SR03_2001b;
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment is a published version for GLODAPv2!
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
RC_SO.png | [autogenerated from RC_Toste/adjustments!] |
View | |
manualXovers.png | [autogenerated from manual_xovers/adjustments!] |
View |
- no files! -
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
alkalinity:6
cruise:2
nitrate:13
oxygen:13
phosphate:12
salinity:13
silicate:13
tco2:8
- no files! -
View 1 ReadMe(s) (Lists all ReadMes)
09AR20011029 - 2008-06-17 14:28:42 - version: 0Posted on 2008-06-17 14:28:42 - last updated on 2008-06-17 14:28:42 as version number 0
4/5/07 Initialized README file
Cruise dates: 10/29-12/11/2001
Chief Scientist: B. Tilbrook
Ship and cruise designation: Aurora Australis; 09AA0301 (basename sr03.aa2001)
EXPOCODE: 09AR20011029
134 stations with 24 place Rosette
Hydro: Who - ?; Status - final; S Plus - up to date
Notes:
Nuts/O2: Who - ?; Status - final; S Plus - up to date
Notes:
TCO2: Who - Tilbrook/Sabine; Status - final; S Plus - up to date
Notes: CRM batch 52
CRM analysis: 2005.64+/-1.36umol/kg (1 s.d., n=64)
Somma
TA: Who - Tilbrook/Sabine; Status - final; S Plus - up to date
Notes: Closed cell potentiometric titration
Accuracy and precision estimated to be +/-1.23umol/kg
Shipboard duplicate analyses had absolute difference of 0.79+/-0.62
(1 s.d.,n=151)
fCO2: Who - ; Status - ; S Plus -
Notes:
pH25: Who - ; Status - ; S Plus -
Notes:
CFC: Who - ; Status - final; S Plus - up to date
Notes: Includes cfc-113
C-14: Who - ; Status - ; S Plus -
Notes:
C-13: Who - ; Status - ; S Plus -
Notes:
H-3/He-3: Who - ; Status - ; S Plus -
Notes:
Other:
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:5; CTD oxygen data good, setting CTD oxygen offset and QC flag
to bottle values.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:15 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
09AR20011029/salinity: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: BOTsal is compatible with unchanged CTDsal
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:43 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - salinity
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:31 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
09AR20011029/salinity: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using mean of BOTsal and UNCHANGED CTDsal
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:14 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
09AR20011029 - salinity
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is -3.8 ppm.
No suggestion from the global inversion.
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
9 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is -2.7 (+/-5.2)
ppm.
2 cross overs show significant differences (>5 ppm), but they involve cruises
that are thought to have significant offsets in salinity. When the suggested
offsets are taken into account, the average of all cross overs is -1.2 (+/-1.8)
ppm. This suggests that no adjustment would be required.
CONCLUSION:
Based on the regional analysis above I suggest no adjustment for salinity.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-27 11:21:03 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by ctd_salinity in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:5; CTD oxygen data good, setting CTD oxygen offset and QC flag
to bottle values.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:15 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20011029_DIC.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR19960822_09AR20011029_DIC.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR19980228_09AR20011029_DIC.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR20011029_09AR19930404_DIC.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR20011029_09AR20080322_DIC.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR20011029_49HH19941213_DIC.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR20011029_61TG20020206_DIC.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!] |
View | |
xover_sum_09AR20011029_DIC.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
Autogenerated comment - tCO2
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:31 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
09AR20011029 - tco2
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is -2.3 umol/kg.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests no significant adjustment (-0.9+/-2.1
umol/kg).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
6 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is -0.9 (+/-7.8)
umol/kg.
All cross overs but 2 show no significant differences (<4 umol/kg) and involve
cruises that are thought to have no significant offset in TCO2. When the offset
suggested for the cruise 35MF20030123 is taken into account, the average of all
cross overs is +2.1 (+/-2.3) umol/kg. This suggests that no adjustment would be
required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses agree.
Based on this I suggest no adjustment for TCO2.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-27 11:21:21 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
unadjusted_09AR19941213_09AR20011029_ALK.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/alkalinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR19960822_09AR20011029_ALK.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/alkalinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR19980228_09AR20011029_ALK.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/alkalinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR20011029_09AR20080322_ALK.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/alkalinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR20011029_49HH19941213_ALK.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/alkalinity!] |
View | |
xover_sum_09AR20011029_ALK.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/alkalinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
Autogenerated comment - alkalinity
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:31 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
09AR20011029 - alkalinity
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is -16.2 umol/kg.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests that an adjustment could be required (+8.4
+/-2.7 umol/kg).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
4 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is -14.3 (+/-7.9)
umol/kg.
Only 1 cross over shows no significant differences (<5 umol/kg), but it involves
a cruise that is thought to have no offset in alkalinity. When the offsets
suggested for the other cruises are taken into account, the average of all cross
overs is -0.4 (+/-0.6) umol/kg. This suggests that no adjustment would be
required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses disagree. The global inversion suggests that an
adjustment of +8 umol/kg could be required, whereas the regional analysis
suggests no adjustment. The latter is preferred as it agrees with the PI’s
recommendation (Bronte Tilbrook, personal communication). Based on this I
suggest no adjustment for alkalinity.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-27 11:21:44 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
Autogenerated comment - phosphate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : Change to 1.05. See note
about accepting inversion suggestion.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:31 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
09AR20011029 - phosphate
Changes PO4 from 1.03 to 1.05. Several inversions (local, Indian, full Southern
Ocean) suggest adjustments of 5% to 6%. Mean offset is -5% as well, so makes
sense.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-04-22 15:14:36 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
09AR20011029 - phosphate
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 0.969.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests that an adjustment of 1.07 could be
required (1.077 +/-0.024).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
8 cross overs were analyzed, but 1 is discarded due to large uncertainty (with
cruise 09AR19930404). The average of the 7 cross overs is 0.974 (+/-0.061).
Only 2 cross overs show no significant differences (<2%), but they involve
cruises that are thought to have offsets in phosphate. Only 1 cross over
involves a cruise that is thought to have no significant offset in phosphate
(09AR19960822), which shows an offset of 0.969 (+/-0.018). When the offsets
suggested for the other cruises are taken into account, the average of all cross
overs is 0.970 (+/-0.003). This suggests that an adjustment of 1.03 could be
required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses suggest low phosphate values, but different
adjustments are proposed: 1.07 or 1.03, respectively. The lower adjustment is
preferred.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 1.03 for phosphate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-27 11:23:05 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
Autogenerated comment - nitrate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:31 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
09AR20011029 - nitrate
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 0.992.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests no significant adjustment (0.999
+/-0.014).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
9 cross overs were analyzed, but 1 is discarded due to large uncertainty (with
cruise 09AR19930404). The average of the 8 cross overs is 1.000 (+/-0.021).
6 cross overs show no significant differences (<2%) and 5 of them involve
cruises that are thought to have no significant offset in nitrate. When the
offsets suggested for the other cruises are taken into account, the average of
all cross overs is 1.002 (+/-0.009). This suggests that no adjustment would be
required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses agree.
Based on this I suggest no adjustment for nitrate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-27 11:22:18 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
Autogenerated comment - phosphate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : Change to 1.05. See note
about accepting inversion suggestion.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:31 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
09AR20011029 - phosphate
Changes PO4 from 1.03 to 1.05. Several inversions (local, Indian, full Southern
Ocean) suggest adjustments of 5% to 6%. Mean offset is -5% as well, so makes
sense.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-04-22 15:14:36 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
09AR20011029 - phosphate
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 0.969.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests that an adjustment of 1.07 could be
required (1.077 +/-0.024).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
8 cross overs were analyzed, but 1 is discarded due to large uncertainty (with
cruise 09AR19930404). The average of the 7 cross overs is 0.974 (+/-0.061).
Only 2 cross overs show no significant differences (<2%), but they involve
cruises that are thought to have offsets in phosphate. Only 1 cross over
involves a cruise that is thought to have no significant offset in phosphate
(09AR19960822), which shows an offset of 0.969 (+/-0.018). When the offsets
suggested for the other cruises are taken into account, the average of all cross
overs is 0.970 (+/-0.003). This suggests that an adjustment of 1.03 could be
required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses suggest low phosphate values, but different
adjustments are proposed: 1.07 or 1.03, respectively. The lower adjustment is
preferred.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 1.03 for phosphate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-27 11:23:05 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
Autogenerated comment - silicate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:31 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
09AR20011029 - silicate
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 1.056.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests no significant adjustment (0.988
+/-0.030).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
9 cross overs were analyzed, but 1 is discarded due to large uncertainty (with
cruise 09AR19930404). The average of the 8 cross overs is 1.062 (+/-0.047).
3 cross overs show offsets between 1.01 and 1.03 and involve cruises that are
thought to have no significant offset in silicates. When the offsets suggested
for the other cruises are taken into account, the average of the 8 cross overs
is 1.025 (+/-0.006). This suggests that an adjustment of 0.98 could be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses disagree: the former suggests no significant
adjustment, whereas the regional analysis suggests a small adjustment (0.98).
The latter is preferred because of the large uncertainty associated with the
global inversion.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 0.98 for silicate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-27 11:31:26 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:5; CTD oxygen data good, setting CTD oxygen offset and QC flag
to bottle values.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:15 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
09AR20011029/oxygen: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: BOToxy is compatible with unchanged CTDoxy
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:43 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - oxygen
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 0.985
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:31 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
09AR20011029 - oxygen
Slight change in O2 adjustment from 0.98 to 0.985, which is a very unambiguous
result of the recent inverisons.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-04-22 15:19:29 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
09AR20011029/oxygen: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using BOToxy (few or no CTDoxy or BOToxy>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:14 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
09AR20011029 - oxygen
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 1.015.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests an adjustment of 0.976 (+/-0.006).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
9 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is 1.024 (+/-0.025).
Only 1 cross overs show no significant differences (<1%), but it involves a
cruise that is thought to have high oxygen values. 4 cross overs involve cruises
that are thought to have no significant offset in oxygen, suggesting an offset
around 1.02. When the offsets suggested for the other cruises are taken into
account, the average of all cross overs is 1.021 (+/-0.004). This suggests that
an adjustment of 0.98 could be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses agree.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 0.98 for oxygen.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-27 11:32:30 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by ctd_oxygen in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:5; CTD oxygen data good, setting CTD oxygen offset and QC flag
to bottle values.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:15 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 21 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:5; CTD oxygen data good, setting CTD oxygen offset and QC flag
to bottle values.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:15 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
09AR20011029/oxygen: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: BOToxy is compatible with unchanged CTDoxy
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:43 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
09AR20011029/salinity: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: BOTsal is compatible with unchanged CTDsal
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:43 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - oxygen
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 0.985
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:31 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - silicate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:31 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - phosphate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : Change to 1.05. See note
about accepting inversion suggestion.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:31 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - nitrate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:31 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - alkalinity
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:31 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - tCO2
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:31 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - salinity
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:31 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
09AR20011029 - oxygen
Slight change in O2 adjustment from 0.98 to 0.985, which is a very unambiguous
result of the recent inverisons.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-04-22 15:19:29 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
09AR20011029 - phosphate
Changes PO4 from 1.03 to 1.05. Several inversions (local, Indian, full Southern
Ocean) suggest adjustments of 5% to 6%. Mean offset is -5% as well, so makes
sense.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-04-22 15:14:36 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
09AR20011029/oxygen: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using BOToxy (few or no CTDoxy or BOToxy>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:14 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
09AR20011029/salinity: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using mean of BOTsal and UNCHANGED CTDsal
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:14 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
09AR20011029 - oxygen
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 1.015.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests an adjustment of 0.976 (+/-0.006).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
9 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is 1.024 (+/-0.025).
Only 1 cross overs show no significant differences (<1%), but it involves a
cruise that is thought to have high oxygen values. 4 cross overs involve cruises
that are thought to have no significant offset in oxygen, suggesting an offset
around 1.02. When the offsets suggested for the other cruises are taken into
account, the average of all cross overs is 1.021 (+/-0.004). This suggests that
an adjustment of 0.98 could be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses agree.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 0.98 for oxygen.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-27 11:32:30 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
09AR20011029 - silicate
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 1.056.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests no significant adjustment (0.988
+/-0.030).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
9 cross overs were analyzed, but 1 is discarded due to large uncertainty (with
cruise 09AR19930404). The average of the 8 cross overs is 1.062 (+/-0.047).
3 cross overs show offsets between 1.01 and 1.03 and involve cruises that are
thought to have no significant offset in silicates. When the offsets suggested
for the other cruises are taken into account, the average of the 8 cross overs
is 1.025 (+/-0.006). This suggests that an adjustment of 0.98 could be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses disagree: the former suggests no significant
adjustment, whereas the regional analysis suggests a small adjustment (0.98).
The latter is preferred because of the large uncertainty associated with the
global inversion.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 0.98 for silicate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-27 11:31:26 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
09AR20011029 - phosphate
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 0.969.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests that an adjustment of 1.07 could be
required (1.077 +/-0.024).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
8 cross overs were analyzed, but 1 is discarded due to large uncertainty (with
cruise 09AR19930404). The average of the 7 cross overs is 0.974 (+/-0.061).
Only 2 cross overs show no significant differences (<2%), but they involve
cruises that are thought to have offsets in phosphate. Only 1 cross over
involves a cruise that is thought to have no significant offset in phosphate
(09AR19960822), which shows an offset of 0.969 (+/-0.018). When the offsets
suggested for the other cruises are taken into account, the average of all cross
overs is 0.970 (+/-0.003). This suggests that an adjustment of 1.03 could be
required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses suggest low phosphate values, but different
adjustments are proposed: 1.07 or 1.03, respectively. The lower adjustment is
preferred.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 1.03 for phosphate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-27 11:23:05 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
09AR20011029 - nitrate
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 0.992.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests no significant adjustment (0.999
+/-0.014).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
9 cross overs were analyzed, but 1 is discarded due to large uncertainty (with
cruise 09AR19930404). The average of the 8 cross overs is 1.000 (+/-0.021).
6 cross overs show no significant differences (<2%) and 5 of them involve
cruises that are thought to have no significant offset in nitrate. When the
offsets suggested for the other cruises are taken into account, the average of
all cross overs is 1.002 (+/-0.009). This suggests that no adjustment would be
required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses agree.
Based on this I suggest no adjustment for nitrate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-27 11:22:18 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
09AR20011029 - alkalinity
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is -16.2 umol/kg.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests that an adjustment could be required (+8.4
+/-2.7 umol/kg).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
4 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is -14.3 (+/-7.9)
umol/kg.
Only 1 cross over shows no significant differences (<5 umol/kg), but it involves
a cruise that is thought to have no offset in alkalinity. When the offsets
suggested for the other cruises are taken into account, the average of all cross
overs is -0.4 (+/-0.6) umol/kg. This suggests that no adjustment would be
required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses disagree. The global inversion suggests that an
adjustment of +8 umol/kg could be required, whereas the regional analysis
suggests no adjustment. The latter is preferred as it agrees with the PI’s
recommendation (Bronte Tilbrook, personal communication). Based on this I
suggest no adjustment for alkalinity.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-27 11:21:44 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
09AR20011029 - tco2
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is -2.3 umol/kg.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests no significant adjustment (-0.9+/-2.1
umol/kg).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
6 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is -0.9 (+/-7.8)
umol/kg.
All cross overs but 2 show no significant differences (<4 umol/kg) and involve
cruises that are thought to have no significant offset in TCO2. When the offset
suggested for the cruise 35MF20030123 is taken into account, the average of all
cross overs is +2.1 (+/-2.3) umol/kg. This suggests that no adjustment would be
required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses agree.
Based on this I suggest no adjustment for TCO2.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-27 11:21:21 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
09AR20011029 - salinity
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is -3.8 ppm.
No suggestion from the global inversion.
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
9 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is -2.7 (+/-5.2)
ppm.
2 cross overs show significant differences (>5 ppm), but they involve cruises
that are thought to have significant offsets in salinity. When the suggested
offsets are taken into account, the average of all cross overs is -1.2 (+/-1.8)
ppm. This suggests that no adjustment would be required.
CONCLUSION:
Based on the regional analysis above I suggest no adjustment for salinity.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-27 11:21:03 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Hide comments