Cruise: 31WT19910716 (dataset:CARBOOCEAN) Stations:
- [1-last]
- Cruise Info
- Edit Adjustment Values
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: 31WTTUNES-2; WOCE P17C; 31WT19910716; 31WTTUNES-2; WOCE P17C; p16s17ssv; P16S17S
Please wait while loading list of related files

Filename: | Comment: | Action | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Point mouse at filename or action to display full information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RC_SO.png | [autogenerated from RC_Toste/adjustments!] |
View | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
manualXov... | [autogenerated from manual_xovers/adjustments!] |
View |




View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
Changed adjustment to -999 as there are not measured pH, only calculated
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-11-04 10:46:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:5; CTD oxygen data good, setting CTD oxygen offset and QC flag
to bottle values.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: BOToxy is compatible with unchanged CTDoxy
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
31WT19910716/salinity: update slope+intercept - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
autogenerated: BOTsal is compatible with unchanged CTDsal
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
Request by Robert Key (2014-08-14) to add this comment based on email sent by
him:
"...the alk values for this cruise were calculated from pCO2 and TCO2 because
the shorebased alk measurements were problematic and sparse"
Posted by cschirnick@geomar.de on 2014-08-15 11:23:51 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 1.00. Deep PAC
inversion is clear about htis cruise being good
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 0.98, following
inversion (effectively 0.97 including the preadj.). Listed adjustment for SIL
for this cruise additionally contains a pre-adjustment of -1% (default for all
US Pacific SIL data).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : Make 0. The originally
reported ALK values are only a few stations, and show extreme scatter. Bob will
replace those with calculated TA values from Chris Sabine. No formal QC2 has
been performed on those yet, but an eyeball estimate suggests they may be
accurate. For now, use 0..
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Autogenerated comment - salinity - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
From Bremen, 31WT19910531, 31WT19910716 and 31WT19910831 are a trio,all off them
seem a bit high. We opt to shift them down by the average 2% to maintain
consistency between them, and with the wider PAC.
Posted by are.olsen@gfi.uib.no on 2014-02-26 10:25:41 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: using BOToxy (few or no CTDoxy or BOToxy>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
31WT19910716/salinity: init slope+intercept - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
autogenerated: using BOTsal (few or no CTDsal or BOTsal>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-12 09:52:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
31WT19910716 - salinity - Comment inherited from CARBOOCEAN
Only two cross-overs, but no deviations. Good cross-overs with core cruise
49NZ20030803.
I suggest no adjustment for salinity.
16 September 2008,
Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-09-16 13:14:29 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:35 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:59 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:39 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:22 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:21:47 UTC - Edit - Delete


View comment(s) (filtered by ctd_salinity in subject)
Changed adjustment to -999 as there are not measured pH, only calculated
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-11-04 10:46:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:5; CTD oxygen data good, setting CTD oxygen offset and QC flag
to bottle values.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: BOToxy is compatible with unchanged CTDoxy
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: BOTsal is compatible with unchanged CTDsal
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
Request by Robert Key (2014-08-14) to add this comment based on email sent by
him:
"...the alk values for this cruise were calculated from pCO2 and TCO2 because
the shorebased alk measurements were problematic and sparse"
Posted by cschirnick@geomar.de on 2014-08-15 11:23:51 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 1.00. Deep PAC
inversion is clear about htis cruise being good
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 0.98, following
inversion (effectively 0.97 including the preadj.). Listed adjustment for SIL
for this cruise additionally contains a pre-adjustment of -1% (default for all
US Pacific SIL data).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : Make 0. The originally
reported ALK values are only a few stations, and show extreme scatter. Bob will
replace those with calculated TA values from Chris Sabine. No formal QC2 has
been performed on those yet, but an eyeball estimate suggests they may be
accurate. For now, use 0..
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
From Bremen, 31WT19910531, 31WT19910716 and 31WT19910831 are a trio,all off them
seem a bit high. We opt to shift them down by the average 2% to maintain
consistency between them, and with the wider PAC.
Posted by are.olsen@gfi.uib.no on 2014-02-26 10:25:41 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: using BOToxy (few or no CTDoxy or BOToxy>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: using BOTsal (few or no CTDsal or BOTsal>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-12 09:52:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
Only two cross-overs, but no deviations. Good cross-overs with core cruise
49NZ20030803.
I suggest no adjustment for salinity.
16 September 2008,
Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-09-16 13:14:29 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:35 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:59 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:39 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:22 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:21:47 UTC - Edit - Delete


View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
Changed adjustment to -999 as there are not measured pH, only calculated
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-11-04 10:46:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:5; CTD oxygen data good, setting CTD oxygen offset and QC flag
to bottle values.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: BOToxy is compatible with unchanged CTDoxy
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: BOTsal is compatible with unchanged CTDsal
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
Request by Robert Key (2014-08-14) to add this comment based on email sent by
him:
"...the alk values for this cruise were calculated from pCO2 and TCO2 because
the shorebased alk measurements were problematic and sparse"
Posted by cschirnick@geomar.de on 2014-08-15 11:23:51 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 1.00. Deep PAC
inversion is clear about htis cruise being good
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 0.98, following
inversion (effectively 0.97 including the preadj.). Listed adjustment for SIL
for this cruise additionally contains a pre-adjustment of -1% (default for all
US Pacific SIL data).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : Make 0. The originally
reported ALK values are only a few stations, and show extreme scatter. Bob will
replace those with calculated TA values from Chris Sabine. No formal QC2 has
been performed on those yet, but an eyeball estimate suggests they may be
accurate. For now, use 0..
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Autogenerated comment - tCO2 - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
From Bremen, 31WT19910531, 31WT19910716 and 31WT19910831 are a trio,all off them
seem a bit high. We opt to shift them down by the average 2% to maintain
consistency between them, and with the wider PAC.
Posted by are.olsen@gfi.uib.no on 2014-02-26 10:25:41 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: using BOToxy (few or no CTDoxy or BOToxy>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: using BOTsal (few or no CTDsal or BOTsal>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-12 09:52:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
Only two cross-overs, but no deviations. Good cross-overs with core cruise
49NZ20030803.
I suggest no adjustment for salinity.
16 September 2008,
Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-09-16 13:14:29 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:35 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:59 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:39 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:22 UTC - Edit - Delete
31WT19910716 - tco2 - Comment inherited from CARBOOCEAN
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:21:47 UTC - Edit - Delete


View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
Changed adjustment to -999 as there are not measured pH, only calculated
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-11-04 10:46:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:5; CTD oxygen data good, setting CTD oxygen offset and QC flag
to bottle values.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: BOToxy is compatible with unchanged CTDoxy
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: BOTsal is compatible with unchanged CTDsal
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
31WT19910716 - alkalinity - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
Request by Robert Key (2014-08-14) to add this comment based on email sent by
him:
"...the alk values for this cruise were calculated from pCO2 and TCO2 because
the shorebased alk measurements were problematic and sparse"
Posted by cschirnick@geomar.de on 2014-08-15 11:23:51 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 1.00. Deep PAC
inversion is clear about htis cruise being good
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 0.98, following
inversion (effectively 0.97 including the preadj.). Listed adjustment for SIL
for this cruise additionally contains a pre-adjustment of -1% (default for all
US Pacific SIL data).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Autogenerated comment - alkalinity - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : Make 0. The originally
reported ALK values are only a few stations, and show extreme scatter. Bob will
replace those with calculated TA values from Chris Sabine. No formal QC2 has
been performed on those yet, but an eyeball estimate suggests they may be
accurate. For now, use 0..
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
From Bremen, 31WT19910531, 31WT19910716 and 31WT19910831 are a trio,all off them
seem a bit high. We opt to shift them down by the average 2% to maintain
consistency between them, and with the wider PAC.
Posted by are.olsen@gfi.uib.no on 2014-02-26 10:25:41 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: using BOToxy (few or no CTDoxy or BOToxy>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: using BOTsal (few or no CTDsal or BOTsal>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-12 09:52:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
Only two cross-overs, but no deviations. Good cross-overs with core cruise
49NZ20030803.
I suggest no adjustment for salinity.
16 September 2008,
Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-09-16 13:14:29 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:35 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:59 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:39 UTC - Edit - Delete
31WT19910716 - alkalinity - Comment inherited from CARBOOCEAN
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:22 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:21:47 UTC - Edit - Delete


View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
31WT19910716 - ph - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
Changed adjustment to -999 as there are not measured pH, only calculated
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-11-04 10:46:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:5; CTD oxygen data good, setting CTD oxygen offset and QC flag
to bottle values.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: BOToxy is compatible with unchanged CTDoxy
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: BOTsal is compatible with unchanged CTDsal
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
Request by Robert Key (2014-08-14) to add this comment based on email sent by
him:
"...the alk values for this cruise were calculated from pCO2 and TCO2 because
the shorebased alk measurements were problematic and sparse"
Posted by cschirnick@geomar.de on 2014-08-15 11:23:51 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 1.00. Deep PAC
inversion is clear about htis cruise being good
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 0.98, following
inversion (effectively 0.97 including the preadj.). Listed adjustment for SIL
for this cruise additionally contains a pre-adjustment of -1% (default for all
US Pacific SIL data).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Autogenerated comment - phosphate - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : Make 0. The originally
reported ALK values are only a few stations, and show extreme scatter. Bob will
replace those with calculated TA values from Chris Sabine. No formal QC2 has
been performed on those yet, but an eyeball estimate suggests they may be
accurate. For now, use 0..
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
From Bremen, 31WT19910531, 31WT19910716 and 31WT19910831 are a trio,all off them
seem a bit high. We opt to shift them down by the average 2% to maintain
consistency between them, and with the wider PAC.
Posted by are.olsen@gfi.uib.no on 2014-02-26 10:25:41 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: using BOToxy (few or no CTDoxy or BOToxy>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: using BOTsal (few or no CTDsal or BOTsal>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-12 09:52:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
Only two cross-overs, but no deviations. Good cross-overs with core cruise
49NZ20030803.
I suggest no adjustment for salinity.
16 September 2008,
Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-09-16 13:14:29 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:35 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
31WT19910716 - phosphate - Comment inherited from CARBOOCEAN
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:59 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:39 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:22 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:21:47 UTC - Edit - Delete


View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
Changed adjustment to -999 as there are not measured pH, only calculated
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-11-04 10:46:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:5; CTD oxygen data good, setting CTD oxygen offset and QC flag
to bottle values.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: BOToxy is compatible with unchanged CTDoxy
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: BOTsal is compatible with unchanged CTDsal
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
Request by Robert Key (2014-08-14) to add this comment based on email sent by
him:
"...the alk values for this cruise were calculated from pCO2 and TCO2 because
the shorebased alk measurements were problematic and sparse"
Posted by cschirnick@geomar.de on 2014-08-15 11:23:51 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 1.00. Deep PAC
inversion is clear about htis cruise being good
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 0.98, following
inversion (effectively 0.97 including the preadj.). Listed adjustment for SIL
for this cruise additionally contains a pre-adjustment of -1% (default for all
US Pacific SIL data).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Autogenerated comment - nitrate - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : Make 0. The originally
reported ALK values are only a few stations, and show extreme scatter. Bob will
replace those with calculated TA values from Chris Sabine. No formal QC2 has
been performed on those yet, but an eyeball estimate suggests they may be
accurate. For now, use 0..
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
From Bremen, 31WT19910531, 31WT19910716 and 31WT19910831 are a trio,all off them
seem a bit high. We opt to shift them down by the average 2% to maintain
consistency between them, and with the wider PAC.
Posted by are.olsen@gfi.uib.no on 2014-02-26 10:25:41 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: using BOToxy (few or no CTDoxy or BOToxy>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: using BOTsal (few or no CTDsal or BOTsal>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-12 09:52:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
Only two cross-overs, but no deviations. Good cross-overs with core cruise
49NZ20030803.
I suggest no adjustment for salinity.
16 September 2008,
Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-09-16 13:14:29 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:35 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:59 UTC - Edit - Delete
31WT19910716 - nitrate - Comment inherited from CARBOOCEAN
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:39 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:22 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:21:47 UTC - Edit - Delete


View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
Changed adjustment to -999 as there are not measured pH, only calculated
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-11-04 10:46:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:5; CTD oxygen data good, setting CTD oxygen offset and QC flag
to bottle values.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: BOToxy is compatible with unchanged CTDoxy
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: BOTsal is compatible with unchanged CTDsal
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
Request by Robert Key (2014-08-14) to add this comment based on email sent by
him:
"...the alk values for this cruise were calculated from pCO2 and TCO2 because
the shorebased alk measurements were problematic and sparse"
Posted by cschirnick@geomar.de on 2014-08-15 11:23:51 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 1.00. Deep PAC
inversion is clear about htis cruise being good
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 0.98, following
inversion (effectively 0.97 including the preadj.). Listed adjustment for SIL
for this cruise additionally contains a pre-adjustment of -1% (default for all
US Pacific SIL data).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Autogenerated comment - phosphate - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : Make 0. The originally
reported ALK values are only a few stations, and show extreme scatter. Bob will
replace those with calculated TA values from Chris Sabine. No formal QC2 has
been performed on those yet, but an eyeball estimate suggests they may be
accurate. For now, use 0..
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
From Bremen, 31WT19910531, 31WT19910716 and 31WT19910831 are a trio,all off them
seem a bit high. We opt to shift them down by the average 2% to maintain
consistency between them, and with the wider PAC.
Posted by are.olsen@gfi.uib.no on 2014-02-26 10:25:41 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: using BOToxy (few or no CTDoxy or BOToxy>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: using BOTsal (few or no CTDsal or BOTsal>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-12 09:52:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
Only two cross-overs, but no deviations. Good cross-overs with core cruise
49NZ20030803.
I suggest no adjustment for salinity.
16 September 2008,
Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-09-16 13:14:29 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:35 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
31WT19910716 - phosphate - Comment inherited from CARBOOCEAN
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:59 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:39 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:22 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:21:47 UTC - Edit - Delete


View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
Changed adjustment to -999 as there are not measured pH, only calculated
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-11-04 10:46:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:5; CTD oxygen data good, setting CTD oxygen offset and QC flag
to bottle values.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: BOToxy is compatible with unchanged CTDoxy
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: BOTsal is compatible with unchanged CTDsal
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
Request by Robert Key (2014-08-14) to add this comment based on email sent by
him:
"...the alk values for this cruise were calculated from pCO2 and TCO2 because
the shorebased alk measurements were problematic and sparse"
Posted by cschirnick@geomar.de on 2014-08-15 11:23:51 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 1.00. Deep PAC
inversion is clear about htis cruise being good
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Autogenerated comment - silicate - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 0.98, following
inversion (effectively 0.97 including the preadj.). Listed adjustment for SIL
for this cruise additionally contains a pre-adjustment of -1% (default for all
US Pacific SIL data).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : Make 0. The originally
reported ALK values are only a few stations, and show extreme scatter. Bob will
replace those with calculated TA values from Chris Sabine. No formal QC2 has
been performed on those yet, but an eyeball estimate suggests they may be
accurate. For now, use 0..
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
31WT19910716 - silicate - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
From Bremen, 31WT19910531, 31WT19910716 and 31WT19910831 are a trio,all off them
seem a bit high. We opt to shift them down by the average 2% to maintain
consistency between them, and with the wider PAC.
Posted by are.olsen@gfi.uib.no on 2014-02-26 10:25:41 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: using BOToxy (few or no CTDoxy or BOToxy>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: using BOTsal (few or no CTDsal or BOTsal>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-12 09:52:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
Only two cross-overs, but no deviations. Good cross-overs with core cruise
49NZ20030803.
I suggest no adjustment for salinity.
16 September 2008,
Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-09-16 13:14:29 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:35 UTC - Edit - Delete
31WT19910716 - silicate - Comment inherited from CARBOOCEAN
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:59 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:39 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:22 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:21:47 UTC - Edit - Delete


View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
Changed adjustment to -999 as there are not measured pH, only calculated
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-11-04 10:46:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:5; CTD oxygen data good, setting CTD oxygen offset and QC flag
to bottle values.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
31WT19910716/oxygen: update slope+intercept - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
autogenerated: BOToxy is compatible with unchanged CTDoxy
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: BOTsal is compatible with unchanged CTDsal
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
Request by Robert Key (2014-08-14) to add this comment based on email sent by
him:
"...the alk values for this cruise were calculated from pCO2 and TCO2 because
the shorebased alk measurements were problematic and sparse"
Posted by cschirnick@geomar.de on 2014-08-15 11:23:51 UTC - Edit - Delete
Autogenerated comment - oxygen - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 1.00. Deep PAC
inversion is clear about htis cruise being good
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 0.98, following
inversion (effectively 0.97 including the preadj.). Listed adjustment for SIL
for this cruise additionally contains a pre-adjustment of -1% (default for all
US Pacific SIL data).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : Make 0. The originally
reported ALK values are only a few stations, and show extreme scatter. Bob will
replace those with calculated TA values from Chris Sabine. No formal QC2 has
been performed on those yet, but an eyeball estimate suggests they may be
accurate. For now, use 0..
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
From Bremen, 31WT19910531, 31WT19910716 and 31WT19910831 are a trio,all off them
seem a bit high. We opt to shift them down by the average 2% to maintain
consistency between them, and with the wider PAC.
Posted by are.olsen@gfi.uib.no on 2014-02-26 10:25:41 UTC - Edit - Delete
31WT19910716/oxygen: init slope+intercept - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
autogenerated: using BOToxy (few or no CTDoxy or BOToxy>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: using BOTsal (few or no CTDsal or BOTsal>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-12 09:52:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
Only two cross-overs, but no deviations. Good cross-overs with core cruise
49NZ20030803.
I suggest no adjustment for salinity.
16 September 2008,
Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-09-16 13:14:29 UTC - Edit - Delete
31WT19910716 - oxygen - Comment inherited from CARBOOCEAN
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:35 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:59 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:39 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:22 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:21:47 UTC - Edit - Delete


View comment(s) (filtered by ctd_oxygen in subject)
Changed adjustment to -999 as there are not measured pH, only calculated
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-11-04 10:46:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:5; CTD oxygen data good, setting CTD oxygen offset and QC flag
to bottle values.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: BOToxy is compatible with unchanged CTDoxy
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: BOTsal is compatible with unchanged CTDsal
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
Request by Robert Key (2014-08-14) to add this comment based on email sent by
him:
"...the alk values for this cruise were calculated from pCO2 and TCO2 because
the shorebased alk measurements were problematic and sparse"
Posted by cschirnick@geomar.de on 2014-08-15 11:23:51 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 1.00. Deep PAC
inversion is clear about htis cruise being good
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 0.98, following
inversion (effectively 0.97 including the preadj.). Listed adjustment for SIL
for this cruise additionally contains a pre-adjustment of -1% (default for all
US Pacific SIL data).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : Make 0. The originally
reported ALK values are only a few stations, and show extreme scatter. Bob will
replace those with calculated TA values from Chris Sabine. No formal QC2 has
been performed on those yet, but an eyeball estimate suggests they may be
accurate. For now, use 0..
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
From Bremen, 31WT19910531, 31WT19910716 and 31WT19910831 are a trio,all off them
seem a bit high. We opt to shift them down by the average 2% to maintain
consistency between them, and with the wider PAC.
Posted by are.olsen@gfi.uib.no on 2014-02-26 10:25:41 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: using BOToxy (few or no CTDoxy or BOToxy>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: using BOTsal (few or no CTDsal or BOTsal>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-12 09:52:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
Only two cross-overs, but no deviations. Good cross-overs with core cruise
49NZ20030803.
I suggest no adjustment for salinity.
16 September 2008,
Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-09-16 13:14:29 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:35 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:59 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:39 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:22 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:21:47 UTC - Edit - Delete


View comment(s) (filtered by cfc12 in subject)
Changed adjustment to -999 as there are not measured pH, only calculated
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-11-04 10:46:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:5; CTD oxygen data good, setting CTD oxygen offset and QC flag
to bottle values.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: BOToxy is compatible with unchanged CTDoxy
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: BOTsal is compatible with unchanged CTDsal
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
Request by Robert Key (2014-08-14) to add this comment based on email sent by
him:
"...the alk values for this cruise were calculated from pCO2 and TCO2 because
the shorebased alk measurements were problematic and sparse"
Posted by cschirnick@geomar.de on 2014-08-15 11:23:51 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 1.00. Deep PAC
inversion is clear about htis cruise being good
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 0.98, following
inversion (effectively 0.97 including the preadj.). Listed adjustment for SIL
for this cruise additionally contains a pre-adjustment of -1% (default for all
US Pacific SIL data).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : Make 0. The originally
reported ALK values are only a few stations, and show extreme scatter. Bob will
replace those with calculated TA values from Chris Sabine. No formal QC2 has
been performed on those yet, but an eyeball estimate suggests they may be
accurate. For now, use 0..
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
From Bremen, 31WT19910531, 31WT19910716 and 31WT19910831 are a trio,all off them
seem a bit high. We opt to shift them down by the average 2% to maintain
consistency between them, and with the wider PAC.
Posted by are.olsen@gfi.uib.no on 2014-02-26 10:25:41 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: using BOToxy (few or no CTDoxy or BOToxy>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: using BOTsal (few or no CTDsal or BOTsal>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-12 09:52:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
Only two cross-overs, but no deviations. Good cross-overs with core cruise
49NZ20030803.
I suggest no adjustment for salinity.
16 September 2008,
Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-09-16 13:14:29 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:35 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:59 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:39 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:22 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:21:47 UTC - Edit - Delete


View comment(s) (filtered by cfc11 in subject)
Changed adjustment to -999 as there are not measured pH, only calculated
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-11-04 10:46:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:5; CTD oxygen data good, setting CTD oxygen offset and QC flag
to bottle values.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: BOToxy is compatible with unchanged CTDoxy
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: BOTsal is compatible with unchanged CTDsal
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
Request by Robert Key (2014-08-14) to add this comment based on email sent by
him:
"...the alk values for this cruise were calculated from pCO2 and TCO2 because
the shorebased alk measurements were problematic and sparse"
Posted by cschirnick@geomar.de on 2014-08-15 11:23:51 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 1.00. Deep PAC
inversion is clear about htis cruise being good
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 0.98, following
inversion (effectively 0.97 including the preadj.). Listed adjustment for SIL
for this cruise additionally contains a pre-adjustment of -1% (default for all
US Pacific SIL data).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : Make 0. The originally
reported ALK values are only a few stations, and show extreme scatter. Bob will
replace those with calculated TA values from Chris Sabine. No formal QC2 has
been performed on those yet, but an eyeball estimate suggests they may be
accurate. For now, use 0..
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
From Bremen, 31WT19910531, 31WT19910716 and 31WT19910831 are a trio,all off them
seem a bit high. We opt to shift them down by the average 2% to maintain
consistency between them, and with the wider PAC.
Posted by are.olsen@gfi.uib.no on 2014-02-26 10:25:41 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: using BOToxy (few or no CTDoxy or BOToxy>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: using BOTsal (few or no CTDsal or BOTsal>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-12 09:52:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
Only two cross-overs, but no deviations. Good cross-overs with core cruise
49NZ20030803.
I suggest no adjustment for salinity.
16 September 2008,
Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-09-16 13:14:29 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:35 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:59 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:39 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:22 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:21:47 UTC - Edit - Delete


View comment(s) (filtered by cfc113 in subject)
Changed adjustment to -999 as there are not measured pH, only calculated
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-11-04 10:46:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:5; CTD oxygen data good, setting CTD oxygen offset and QC flag
to bottle values.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: BOToxy is compatible with unchanged CTDoxy
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: BOTsal is compatible with unchanged CTDsal
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
Request by Robert Key (2014-08-14) to add this comment based on email sent by
him:
"...the alk values for this cruise were calculated from pCO2 and TCO2 because
the shorebased alk measurements were problematic and sparse"
Posted by cschirnick@geomar.de on 2014-08-15 11:23:51 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 1.00. Deep PAC
inversion is clear about htis cruise being good
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 0.98, following
inversion (effectively 0.97 including the preadj.). Listed adjustment for SIL
for this cruise additionally contains a pre-adjustment of -1% (default for all
US Pacific SIL data).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : Make 0. The originally
reported ALK values are only a few stations, and show extreme scatter. Bob will
replace those with calculated TA values from Chris Sabine. No formal QC2 has
been performed on those yet, but an eyeball estimate suggests they may be
accurate. For now, use 0..
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
From Bremen, 31WT19910531, 31WT19910716 and 31WT19910831 are a trio,all off them
seem a bit high. We opt to shift them down by the average 2% to maintain
consistency between them, and with the wider PAC.
Posted by are.olsen@gfi.uib.no on 2014-02-26 10:25:41 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: using BOToxy (few or no CTDoxy or BOToxy>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: using BOTsal (few or no CTDsal or BOTsal>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-12 09:52:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
Only two cross-overs, but no deviations. Good cross-overs with core cruise
49NZ20030803.
I suggest no adjustment for salinity.
16 September 2008,
Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-09-16 13:14:29 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:35 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:59 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:39 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:22 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:21:47 UTC - Edit - Delete


View comment(s) (filtered by ccl4 in subject)
Changed adjustment to -999 as there are not measured pH, only calculated
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-11-04 10:46:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:5; CTD oxygen data good, setting CTD oxygen offset and QC flag
to bottle values.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: BOToxy is compatible with unchanged CTDoxy
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: BOTsal is compatible with unchanged CTDsal
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
Request by Robert Key (2014-08-14) to add this comment based on email sent by
him:
"...the alk values for this cruise were calculated from pCO2 and TCO2 because
the shorebased alk measurements were problematic and sparse"
Posted by cschirnick@geomar.de on 2014-08-15 11:23:51 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 1.00. Deep PAC
inversion is clear about htis cruise being good
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 0.98, following
inversion (effectively 0.97 including the preadj.). Listed adjustment for SIL
for this cruise additionally contains a pre-adjustment of -1% (default for all
US Pacific SIL data).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : Make 0. The originally
reported ALK values are only a few stations, and show extreme scatter. Bob will
replace those with calculated TA values from Chris Sabine. No formal QC2 has
been performed on those yet, but an eyeball estimate suggests they may be
accurate. For now, use 0..
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
From Bremen, 31WT19910531, 31WT19910716 and 31WT19910831 are a trio,all off them
seem a bit high. We opt to shift them down by the average 2% to maintain
consistency between them, and with the wider PAC.
Posted by are.olsen@gfi.uib.no on 2014-02-26 10:25:41 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: using BOToxy (few or no CTDoxy or BOToxy>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
autogenerated: using BOTsal (few or no CTDsal or BOTsal>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-12 09:52:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
Only two cross-overs, but no deviations. Good cross-overs with core cruise
49NZ20030803.
I suggest no adjustment for salinity.
16 September 2008,
Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-09-16 13:14:29 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:35 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:59 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:39 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:22 UTC - Edit - Delete
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:21:47 UTC - Edit - Delete
View 23 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
31WT19910716 - ph - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
Changed adjustment to -999 as there are not measured pH, only calculated
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-11-04 10:46:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:5; CTD oxygen data good, setting CTD oxygen offset and QC flag
to bottle values.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
31WT19910716/oxygen: update slope+intercept - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
autogenerated: BOToxy is compatible with unchanged CTDoxy
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
31WT19910716/salinity: update slope+intercept - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
autogenerated: BOTsal is compatible with unchanged CTDsal
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:48 UTC - Edit - Delete
31WT19910716 - alkalinity - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
Request by Robert Key (2014-08-14) to add this comment based on email sent by
him:
"...the alk values for this cruise were calculated from pCO2 and TCO2 because
the shorebased alk measurements were problematic and sparse"
Posted by cschirnick@geomar.de on 2014-08-15 11:23:51 UTC - Edit - Delete
Autogenerated comment - oxygen - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 1.00. Deep PAC
inversion is clear about htis cruise being good
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Autogenerated comment - silicate - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 0.98, following
inversion (effectively 0.97 including the preadj.). Listed adjustment for SIL
for this cruise additionally contains a pre-adjustment of -1% (default for all
US Pacific SIL data).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Autogenerated comment - phosphate - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Autogenerated comment - nitrate - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Autogenerated comment - alkalinity - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : Make 0. The originally
reported ALK values are only a few stations, and show extreme scatter. Bob will
replace those with calculated TA values from Chris Sabine. No formal QC2 has
been performed on those yet, but an eyeball estimate suggests they may be
accurate. For now, use 0..
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Autogenerated comment - tCO2 - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
Autogenerated comment - salinity - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:36 UTC - Edit - Delete
31WT19910716 - silicate - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
From Bremen, 31WT19910531, 31WT19910716 and 31WT19910831 are a trio,all off them
seem a bit high. We opt to shift them down by the average 2% to maintain
consistency between them, and with the wider PAC.
Posted by are.olsen@gfi.uib.no on 2014-02-26 10:25:41 UTC - Edit - Delete
31WT19910716/oxygen: init slope+intercept - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
autogenerated: using BOToxy (few or no CTDoxy or BOToxy>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
31WT19910716/salinity: init slope+intercept - (current GLODAPv2/PACIFICA comment)
autogenerated: using BOTsal (few or no CTDsal or BOTsal>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:17 UTC - Edit - Delete
adjustements from PACIFICA - Comment inherited from GLODAPv1.2
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-12 09:52:56 UTC - Edit - Delete
31WT19910716 - salinity - Comment inherited from CARBOOCEAN
Only two cross-overs, but no deviations. Good cross-overs with core cruise
49NZ20030803.
I suggest no adjustment for salinity.
16 September 2008,
Mario Hoppema
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-09-16 13:14:29 UTC - Edit - Delete
31WT19910716 - oxygen - Comment inherited from CARBOOCEAN
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:35 UTC - Edit - Delete
31WT19910716 - silicate - Comment inherited from CARBOOCEAN
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:23:19 UTC - Edit - Delete
31WT19910716 - phosphate - Comment inherited from CARBOOCEAN
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:59 UTC - Edit - Delete
31WT19910716 - nitrate - Comment inherited from CARBOOCEAN
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:39 UTC - Edit - Delete
31WT19910716 - alkalinity - Comment inherited from CARBOOCEAN
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:22:22 UTC - Edit - Delete
31WT19910716 - tco2 - Comment inherited from CARBOOCEAN
Based on assessment made in Paris.
Posted by chris.sabine@noaa.gov on 2008-06-30 18:21:47 UTC - Edit - Delete
Hide comments