Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:24 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - salinity

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 0

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

323019940104/salinity: update slope+intercept

autogenerated: only BOTsal available (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:41 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

323019940104/salinity: init slope+intercept

autogenerated: using BOTsal (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

323019940104 - salinity

The inversion suggest a correction of -0.61 ppm, based on ~23 crossovers with a
mean offset of 2.8 ppm. Do not adjust. This is consistent with CARINA.

Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-08-31 10:26:51 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Hide comments

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:24 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Hide comments

Autogenerated comment - tCO2

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 0

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

323019940104 - tco2

Mean offset with 12 cruises: -1.1
Inversion suggests: -2.0
I suggest NO adjustment, in agreement with GLODAPv1 and CARINA (Pierrot et al,
ESSD, 2010)

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2012-12-10 15:30:06 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

323019940104 - tco2

Average offsets:
2.40 (automatic)
2.40 (manual)
Average offsets from xovers with Core Cruises:
1.35 (automatic)
1.35 (manual)
Inversion Results:
-1.57 WLSQ
-2.04 WDLSQ
Comments: All xovers with core cruises show low offsets. 2 xovers with 56 and
1084 show large offsets which go close to zero after adjustments suggested for
these 2 cruises.
Therefore I suggests no adjustment

Suggested adjustment: 0
quality: good
Miami 2008.06.09
Denis Pierrot

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-11 16:34:52 UTC for data product: CARINA

Hide comments

Autogenerated comment - alkalinity

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -12. Comparison with accurate
cruises 29HE2013 and 33RR2011 and others clearly indicate a high bias of about
+12. Application of this and other adjustments improves the weighted mean
absolute offset of this cruise from 13 to to 1.3. That is, a tremendous
improvement. See document Atlantic_Alkalinity.pdf (or similar)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

323019940104 - alkalinity

Mean offset: 8.3 but large spread
Inversion suggests -8.9
CARINA (Velo et al. 2009 ESSD) suggests: -8
We follow CARINA and suggest an adjustment of -8

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2012-12-10 16:00:18 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

323019940104 - alkalinity

323019940104
alkalinity
In the cruise report http://carboocean.ifm-geomar.de/adjustments/download/102681
an offset for alkalinity of -8 was stated.
There are 8 xovers. The fitted offset is -8.9. The suggested adjustment is -8
because it agrees with -8.9+-0.8 of the fitting.
Most of inversion residuals fits inside +-5.
Very good fit with 4 GLODAP.
Vigo 2008/06/09
Fiz Perez
Anton Velo
--
All xovers and output of inversions are refered on figure: "Report plot for
adjustments"
Real diff (Green dots) are the differences taken directly from xover routines.
The complete segment of error bar represents the xover standard deviation.
Yellow line stand for the offset calculated for this cruise.
Black stars stand for the offset calculated for the others cruises in the
xovers.
Blue squares stand for the Fitted differences that would be obtained from the
calculated offsets (Yellow line - black stars)
Red dots stand for the Residuals between the 'Real diff'(Green dots) and 'Fitted
diff' (Blue squares)
c suffix in the upper X axis labels stand for Core Cruises

Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2008-06-10 13:04:02 UTC for data product: CARINA

Hide comments

323019940104 - ph

GLODAPv2 have incorporated the pH data reported at TS25 scale by PI. Original
scale was NBS15. Potentiometric.

Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-11-27 12:07:26 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated update by AV for pH

Bulk update requested by Anton Velo on 2015-06-04 including comments with
reasoning (src: ph_adjustments_g2_sent_carsten_20150604.xlsx / 2015-06-04):
Adjusted by -0.013 to keep interconsistency with QCed TCO2 and TALK

Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-06-10 08:17:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated update by AV for pH

Bulk update of pH requested by Anton Velo on 2015-05-28. Comments with reasoning
will follow. (src: ph_adjustments_g2_sent_carsten_20150527.xlsx / 2015-05-28)

Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-05-28 13:37:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - phosphate

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00. The
US-cruises-only-inversion is quite confident about 1.02 though. But I'm not, so
keep at 1.00

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

323019940104 - phosphate

Earlier decision of giving no adjustment is confirmed by new inversion for
phosphate in the Atlantic with 10 core cruises assigned.

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2012-11-23 15:22:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

323019940104 - phosphate

Suggested correction is 1.0252 but mean offset is 0.997. No adjustment is
recommended. Consistent with CARINA.

Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-10 21:46:45 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

323019940104 - ph

Supposed Original pH Scale: NBS15

Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2008-07-28 13:41:19 UTC for data product: CARINA

323019940104 - ph

323019940104 1011 686
pHSWS25
There are 10 xovers. The fitted offset is -0.009 The suggested adjustment is
-0.009
All residuals are low and fits inside +-0.005.
Very good fit with 3 GLODAP cruises.
Vigo 2008/06/12
Fiz Perez
Anton Velo
--
All xovers and output of inversions are refered on figure: "Report plot for
adjustments"
Real diff (Green dots) are the differences taken directly from xover routines.
The complete segment of error bar represents the xover standard deviation.
Yellow line stand for the offset calculated for this cruise.
Black stars stand for the offset calculated for the others cruises in the
xovers.
Blue squares stand for the Fitted differences that would be obtained from the
calculated offsets (Yellow line - black stars)
Red dots stand for the Residuals between the 'Real diff'(Green dots) and 'Fitted
diff' (Blue squares)
c suffix in the upper X axis labels stand for Core Cruises.
d preffix in the upper X axis labels stand for pH determined with Alk and TCO2
using the CO2SYS routines and the Mehr'73 ctes fitted by Dick&Mill'87.
expocode ids in upper X axis stand for NA ids or SO_ids+10000 for avoiding
coincidences

Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2008-06-12 19:59:35 UTC for data product: CARINA

323019940104 - phosphate

Average of all cross-overs is 1.007 (Southern Ocean) and 1.001 (North Atlantic).
Inversion analysis suggests no significant adjustment for either of the two
regions.
Cross-overs with core cruises do not support an adjustment.
I suggest NO adjustment of phosphate for cruise 323019940104.
10 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-10 09:31:11 UTC for data product: CARINA

Hide comments

Hide comments

Autogenerated comment - nitrate

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make 0.98. That's the inversion
suggestion, and also mean of xovers (+2.0±2.5%, n=~30)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

323019940104 - nitrate

Suggested correction is 0.9865 and MO 1.017. Do not adjust. Consistent with
CARINA.

Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-08-31 15:19:18 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

323019940104 - nitrate

This cruise is in GLODAP. The analysis by Gouretski and Jancke (PiO, 2001)
sugggest an adjustment of 0.06 umol/kg.
The N/P ratio is 15.27, intercept -0.79.
The average of all cross overs is 1.002
The inversion suggest an adjustment of 0.96 and 0.98 for WLSQ and WDLSQ,
respectively.
The cross-overs with the core cruises are inconclusive, but largely supports no
adjustment.
Kiel, 2008-06-12
Toste Tanhua

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-12 11:21:51 UTC for data product: CARINA

323019940104 - nitrate

Average of all cross-overs is: 1.002
Inversion analysis (Southern Ocean) suggests no significant adjustment (0.993);
on the other hand, inversion analysis for the North Atlantic does suggest a
slight adjustment of 0.977
Cross-overs with core cruises (49NZ20031106, 74JC19950320, SAVE) do not support
an adjustment - those with 29HE20020304 show a very large standard deviation,
and thus is not significant.
Based on all this I suggest NO adjustment of nitrate for cruise 323019940104.
10 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-10 09:22:01 UTC for data product: CARINA

Hide comments

Autogenerated comment - phosphate

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00. The
US-cruises-only-inversion is quite confident about 1.02 though. But I'm not, so
keep at 1.00

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

323019940104 - phosphate

Earlier decision of giving no adjustment is confirmed by new inversion for
phosphate in the Atlantic with 10 core cruises assigned.

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2012-11-23 15:22:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

323019940104 - phosphate

Suggested correction is 1.0252 but mean offset is 0.997. No adjustment is
recommended. Consistent with CARINA.

Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-10 21:46:45 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

323019940104 - phosphate

Average of all cross-overs is 1.007 (Southern Ocean) and 1.001 (North Atlantic).
Inversion analysis suggests no significant adjustment for either of the two
regions.
Cross-overs with core cruises do not support an adjustment.
I suggest NO adjustment of phosphate for cruise 323019940104.
10 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-10 09:31:11 UTC for data product: CARINA

Hide comments

Autogenerated comment - silicate

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 0.98

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

323019940104 - silicate

The inversion suggest a correction of 0.9827 and the mean offset is 1.017, and
the data do look a bit high, (there are also 23 valid crossovers from the
southwest atlantic, where this cruise took place). I believe this and recommend
that an adjustment of 0.98 is applied to these data. A high bias of 1.6 was
determined in GLODAP and the x0.98 adjustment is consistent with the adjustment
recommended in CARINA.

Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-14 13:15:00 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

323019940104 - silicate

UPDATE
A new inversion analysis for the Southern Ocean data has been done (13 Oct.
2008), now with data to which all suggested adjustments from the first round
were applied. This new analysis suggests a significant adjustment of 0.976
-
Both initial inversion analyses for the North Atlantic and Southern Ocean data
sets did suggests a significant adjustment, but we decided not to follow it (see
other comments). However, after the new inversion analysis, an adjustment is
still suggested.
We therefore suggest a small adjustment of silicate by 0.98
30 October 2008,
Mario Hoppema (agreed by Toste Tanhua).

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-10-30 16:02:37 UTC for data product: CARINA

323019940104 - silicate

By comparing the cross overs from the core cruises to this cruise, I find it
dificult to motivate an adjustment of the values.
I would suggest that no adjustment is applied
Toste Tanhua
Kiel, 2008-06-11

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-12 11:29:07 UTC for data product: CARINA

323019940104 - silicate

Average of all cross-overs is 0.990 (Southern Ocean) and 1.000 (North Atlantic).
Inversion analysis suggests an adjustment of 0.976 (Southern Ocean) and 0.967
(North Atlantic).
The results are inconclusive. I notice that the mean cross-overs results are
strongly influenced by two cruises (29HE20010305, 29HE20020304) with low
cross-overs (and large standard deviations). Cross-over with core cruise
49NZ20031106 does not warrant an adjustment.
At the Paris meeting we agreed on NO adjustment of silicate of cruise
323019940104.
25 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-10 09:45:23 UTC for data product: CARINA

Hide comments

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:24 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - oxygen

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00. Not fully
inspected, but inversion says abs(adj)<0.5% and existing suggestion is also
<0.5%

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:40:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

323019940104/oxygen: update slope+intercept

autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:41 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

323019940104/oxygen: init slope+intercept

autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

323019940104 - oxygen

The inversion suggest a correction of 0.9995 based on 23 crossovers with a mean
offset of 0.998, no adjustment is recommended.

Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-24 10:12:38 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

323019940104 - oxygen

The average of all cross overs is 0.997.
The inversions suggest no adjustment.
The cross-overs with other core cruises do not support that an adjustment is
warranted.
Based on this I suggest no adjustment to the oxygen values.
Zürich, 2008.06.06
Ilaria Stendardo

Posted by ilaria.stendardo@env.ethz.ch on 2008-06-06 12:09:16 UTC for data product: CARINA

Hide comments

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:24 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Hide comments

Hide comments

Hide comments

Hide comments

Hide comments

Hide comments

Hide comments