Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:24 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - salinity

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 0

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:02 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35A319950111/salinity: update slope+intercept

autogenerated: only BOTsal available (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:42 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35A319950111/salinity: init slope+intercept

autogenerated: using BOTsal (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35A319950111 - salinity

The inversion suggest a correction of -0.83 ppm, based on 8 crossovers with a
mean offset of 2.472, do not adjust. This is consistent with CARINA.

Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-08-31 10:08:20 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35A319950111 - salinity

There are only few cross-overs, but those with core cruises (49NZ20031106, SAVE)
do not warrant an adjustment.
13 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-13 09:27:03 UTC for data product: CARINA

Hide comments

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:24 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Hide comments

Autogenerated comment - tCO2

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : Make +3. This cruise is very
clearly about 3 low relative to the excellent 33RO2010, which is parallel (but
5-10 degrees to the East). No localized biased present (as opposed to the
equatorial Atalante cruises from this era). FIGURE
DIC_change_35A319950111_33RO20100308

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:02 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35A319950111 - tco2

Mean offset with 3 cruises: -10.2 but strongly biased by bad x-over with flagged
cruise.
Inversion suggests +4.0 but this is likely influenced by the flagged cruise.
However, some non-valid x-overs seem to indicate that this cruise is ok
I suggest NO adjustment

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2012-12-13 16:55:54 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35A319950111 - tco2

UPDATE
A new inversion analysis has been done (13 Oct. 2008), now with data to which
all suggested adjustments from the first round were applied. This new analysis
suggests a significant adjustment of TCO2 by +5
Although there are very few cross-overs, the one with top core cruise
49NZ20031106 appears to justify a small adjustment.
I therefore suggest the minimum adjustment for TCO2 of +4
30 October 2008,
Mario Hoppema (agreed by Anton Velo)

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-10-30 15:53:01 UTC for data product: CARINA

35A319950111 - tco2

35A319950111 785
tco2
There are only 1 xover. The fitted offset for the inversions is 3.1. The
suggested adjustment is 0
because there is only 1 xover and the inversions yield a value between
boundaries.

Vigo 2008/06/12
Fiz Perez
Anton Velo
--
All xovers and output of inversions are refered on figure: "Report plot for
adjustments"
Real diff (Green dots) are the differences taken directly from xover routines.
The complete segment of error bar represents the xover standard deviation.
Yellow line stand for the offset calculated for this cruise.
Black stars stand for the offset calculated for the others cruises in the
xovers.
Blue squares stand for the Fitted differences that would be obtained from the
calculated offsets (Yellow line - black stars)
Red dots stand for the Residuals between the 'Real diff'(Green dots) and 'Fitted
diff' (Blue squares)
c suffix in the upper X axis labels stand for Core Cruises
expocode ids in upper X axis stand for NA ids or SO_ids+10000 for avoiding
coincidences

Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2008-06-12 12:39:20 UTC for data product: CARINA

Hide comments

Autogenerated comment - alkalinity

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : Make -6. Good sharp profiles, very
high precision, several xovers of reasonably or good quality. Cruise appears
slightly high against several others, in very high-quality xovers (notable
against 33RO2011. +6). Recommendation of -6 matches earlier assessment by Anton.
I believe this recommendation to now be unambiguous. see document
Atlantic_Alkalinity.pdf (or similarly names). Cruise offsets improve to
near-perfect with this (and the other) recommended adjustments.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:02 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35A319950111 - alkalinity

Changed to -9

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2014-02-12 22:29:14 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35A319950111 - alkalinity

Mean offset with only 2 cruises: -10.5 but strongly biased by one cruise wiith
bad data.
Inversion suggests insignificant +0.7
I suggest NO adjustment.

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2012-12-14 15:23:22 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35A319950111 - alkalinity

At the Paris meeting TA was discussed.
The inversion analysis by Steven van Heuven (with 6 cross-overs) suggests an
adjustment of -10. The analysis by Anton Velo (see other comment) would suggest
-6, albeit based on very few data. We agreed that an adjustment is necessary,
and decided to take the mean of the two analyses above.
An adjustment of -8 is proposed for TA of cruise 35A319950111.
26 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-26 14:10:01 UTC for data product: CARINA

35A319950111 - alkalinity

35A319950111 785
alkalinity
There are only 1 xover. The fitted offset for the inversions is -8.7.
The xover is with the SAVE cruise, that has and fitted offset of -3 and a
suggested one of 0,
so 35A319950111 cruise should get an adjustment of -6 instead of -9 in
aggreement with the only xover.
But as there are only 1 xover its proposed -888

Vigo 2008/06/12
Fiz Perez
Anton Velo
--
All xovers and output of inversions are refered on figure: "Report plot for
adjustments"
Real diff (Green dots) are the differences taken directly from xover routines.
The complete segment of error bar represents the xover standard deviation.
Yellow line stand for the offset calculated for this cruise.
Black stars stand for the offset calculated for the others cruises in the
xovers.
Blue squares stand for the Fitted differences that would be obtained from the
calculated offsets (Yellow line - black stars)
Red dots stand for the Residuals between the 'Real diff'(Green dots) and 'Fitted
diff' (Blue squares)
c suffix in the upper X axis labels stand for Core Cruises
expocode ids in upper X axis stand for NA ids or SO_ids+10000 for avoiding
coincidences

Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2008-06-12 12:34:34 UTC for data product: CARINA

Hide comments

Autogenerated update by AV for pH

Bulk update requested by Anton Velo on 2015-06-04 including comments with
reasoning (src: ph_adjustments_g2_sent_carsten_20150604.xlsx / 2015-06-04):
Adjusted by -0.007 to keep interconsistency with QCed TCO2 and TALK

Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-06-10 08:17:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated update by AV for pH

Bulk update of pH requested by Anton Velo on 2015-05-28. Comments with reasoning
will follow. (src: ph_adjustments_g2_sent_carsten_20150527.xlsx / 2015-05-28)

Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-05-28 13:37:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - phosphate

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : revert to 1.00. Excellent dataset.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:02 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35A319950111 - phosphate

Earlier decision of adjustment of 1.02 is confirmed by new inversion for
phosphate in the Atlantic with 10 core cruises assigned.

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2012-11-23 15:14:41 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35A319950111 - phosphate

Suggested correction is 1.0372 and mean offset is 1.007.
Appears similar in values to 35A3CITHER1_1. Initially suggest adjustment of
1.04.But CARINA, suggests 1.02 and I follow that as this is based on more
cruises.

Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-10 21:27:30 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35A319950111 - ph

Original scale: NBS15 (NBS Scale at 15ºC)

Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2009-03-05 14:08:48 UTC for data product: CARINA

35A319950111 - ph

35A319950111 11005 785
pHSWS25
There are only 2 xovers. The fitted offset is +0.003 The suggested adjustment is
0
Residuals fits inside +-0.010.
Vigo 2008/06/12
Fiz Perez
Anton Velo
--
All xovers and output of inversions are refered on figure: "Report plot for
adjustments"
Real diff (Green dots) are the differences taken directly from xover routines.
The complete segment of error bar represents the xover standard deviation.
Yellow line stand for the offset calculated for this cruise.
Black stars stand for the offset calculated for the others cruises in the
xovers.
Blue squares stand for the Fitted differences that would be obtained from the
calculated offsets (Yellow line - black stars)
Red dots stand for the Residuals between the 'Real diff'(Green dots) and 'Fitted
diff' (Blue squares)
c suffix in the upper X axis labels stand for Core Cruises.
d preffix in the upper X axis labels stand for pH determined with Alk and TCO2
using the CO2SYS routines and the Mehr'73 ctes fitted by Dick&Mill'87.
expocode ids in upper X axis stand for NA ids or SO_ids+10000 for avoiding
coincidences

Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2008-06-13 09:52:41 UTC for data product: CARINA

35A319950111 - phosphate

Average of all cross-overs is: 1.008
Inversion analysis suggests an adjustment of 1.015
This cruise has only 4 cross-overs with other cruises, of which 3 have
sufficient data for a statistical analysis.
Core cruises 49NZ20031106 and SAVE appear to support a small offset of phosphate
of cruise 35A319950111
I therefore suggest an adjustment of phosphate for cruise 35A319950111 of 1.02
9 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-09 16:31:58 UTC for data product: CARINA

Hide comments

Hide comments

Autogenerated comment - nitrate

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00. Excellent dataset.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:02 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35A319950111 - nitrate

Suggested correction is 0.999 and mean offset is 1.01.
Seems fine, do not adjust. Consistent with CARINA and GLODAP (just 0.19 umol/kg
low)

Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-08-31 15:06:59 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35A319950111 - nitrate

Average of all cross-overs is: 1.001
Inversion analysis suggests no significant adjustment (1.002).
This cruise has only 4 cross-overs with other cruises, of which 3 have
sufficient data for a statistical analysis.
Cross-overs with core cruises 49NZ20031106 and SAVE warrant that no adjustment
is needed indeed.
I suggest NO adjustment of nitrate for cruise 35A319950111.
9 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-09 16:23:23 UTC for data product: CARINA

Hide comments

Autogenerated comment - phosphate

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : revert to 1.00. Excellent dataset.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:02 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35A319950111 - phosphate

Earlier decision of adjustment of 1.02 is confirmed by new inversion for
phosphate in the Atlantic with 10 core cruises assigned.

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2012-11-23 15:14:41 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35A319950111 - phosphate

Suggested correction is 1.0372 and mean offset is 1.007.
Appears similar in values to 35A3CITHER1_1. Initially suggest adjustment of
1.04.But CARINA, suggests 1.02 and I follow that as this is based on more
cruises.

Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-10 21:27:30 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35A319950111 - phosphate

Average of all cross-overs is: 1.008
Inversion analysis suggests an adjustment of 1.015
This cruise has only 4 cross-overs with other cruises, of which 3 have
sufficient data for a statistical analysis.
Core cruises 49NZ20031106 and SAVE appear to support a small offset of phosphate
of cruise 35A319950111
I therefore suggest an adjustment of phosphate for cruise 35A319950111 of 1.02
9 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-09 16:31:58 UTC for data product: CARINA

Hide comments

Autogenerated comment - silicate

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00 (not re-inspected
for GLODAPv2)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:02 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35A319950111 - silicate

The inversion suggest a correction of 1.0184 and mean offset is 1.00. Suggested
correction is at 2% limit, and since this leg 2 of this cruise appears fine, I
do not recomment any adjustment here either. This is in agreement with CARINA.

Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-13 20:39:16 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35A319950111 - silicate

Average of all cross-overs is: 1.008
Inversion analysis suggests an adjustment of 1.04
This cruise has only 4 cross-overs with other cruises, of which 3 have
sufficient data for a statistical analysis.
Cross-overs with core cruises do not warrant an adjustment. This holds
particularly for the cross-over with cruise 49NZ20031106, while for the
cross-over with SAVE the standard deviation is very large (see manual cross-over
Xover_silicate_35A319950111_1005_SAVE_1043.png).
I suggest NO adjustment of silicate for cruise 35A319950111
9 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-09 16:40:43 UTC for data product: CARINA

Hide comments

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:24 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - oxygen

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00. Not fully
inspected, but inversion says abs(adj)<0.5% and existing suggestion is also
<0.5%

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:02 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35A319950111/oxygen: update slope+intercept

autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:42 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35A319950111/oxygen: init slope+intercept

autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35A319950111 - oxygen

The inversion suggest a correction of 0.9951 based on based on 8 xovers with a
mean offset of 1.01. No adjustment recommended. This is consistent with CARINA.

Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-17 13:27:31 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35A319950111 - oxygen

Average of all cross-overs is: 1.005
Inversion analysis suggests no adjustment (1.001).
This cruise has only 4 cross-overs with other cruises, of which 3 have
sufficient data for a statistical analysis.
Cross-overs with core cruises confirm that an adjustment is not needed.
I suggest NO adjustment of oxygen for cruise 35A319950111.
9 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-09 16:44:03 UTC for data product: CARINA

Hide comments

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:24 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Hide comments

35A319950111 - cfc12

relatively low CFC-12 saturation (~95% compared to ~100% for CFC.-11) and
CFC-12/CFc-11 ratio; enhance by 5%

Posted by rsteinf@physik.uni-bremen.de on 2014-04-29 18:45:15 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Hide comments

Hide comments

Hide comments

Hide comments

Hide comments

Hide comments