GLODAPv2 Adjustments

Stations:	[1-last]
The selected Calculated Carbon Parameter has been dismissed in October 2017! Legacy values will be exported as is and displayed in red with subscript "c", e.g. -0.123456_c! No data available? Insert -999 No suggestion for adjustment possible? Insert -888 To calibrate CTDsal use: CTDsal_calibrated = (CTDsal - CTDsal_intercept) / CTDsal_slope To calibrate CTDoxy use: CTDoxy_calibrated = (CTDoxy - CTDoxy_intercept) / CTDoxy_slope
Insert your commit message below explaining your change(s) before you save…
Salinity [+]
CTD-Sal. [+] slope/intercept - action [ID]	/ - #
TCO₂ [+]
Alkalinity [+]
pH [+]
pCO₂ [+]
Nitrate [x]
Phosphate [x]
Silicate [x]
Oxygen [x]
CTD-Oxyg. [x] slope/intercept - action [ID]	/ - #
CFC12 [x]
CFC11 [x]
CFC113 [x]
CCl4 [x]
C13 [+]
SF6 [x]

Cruise Info

Annotations for this cruise:

View 0 annotation(s) (Lists all annotations)

Files for Adjustment Plot files re. Cruise:

Filename:	Comment:	Action…
35MF19960220___offsets.png	THIS is correct offset figure for AO. The autogenerated ones are both for IO.	View
offsets.png	[autogenerated from RC_Toste/adjustments!]	View
offsets.png	[autogenerated from RC_Are/adjustments!]	View

Data files re. Cruise: - no files! -

Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
alkalinity:9 cruise:3 nitrate:13 oxygen:16 phosphate:14 salinity:17 silicate:16 tco2:12

Plot files re. Cluster: - no files! -

Comments re. this cruise in GLODAPv2

View 38 comment(s) (Lists all comments)

35MF19960220 - ph

Changed adjustment to -999 as there are not measured pH, only calculated

Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-11-04 10:53:09 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:25 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220/oxygen: update slope+intercept

autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:44 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220/salinity: update slope+intercept

autogenerated: only BOTsal available (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:44 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - oxygen

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:37 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - silicate

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 0.91, which better
matches the inversion result. Terrible spread in northerly profiles. QC1

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:37 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - phosphate

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : change to 0.97 for good
fit with 33RR20080204

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:37 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - nitrate

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : chage to 0.97. Clear
improvement from inverting.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:37 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - alkalinity

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:37 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - tCO2

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:37 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - salinity

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:37 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - silicate

changes slightly to 0.91 based on recent 2step inversion.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-04-23 14:33:39 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - phosphate

Changed to 0.97 based on recent 2step inversions (which ignored the many
confounding results from OISO and 74DIxxx)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-04-23 14:32:25 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - nitrate

Changed to 0.97. Recent 2step inversions (large scale and local, always ignoring
OISO and SW Indian 74DIxxx cruises) gives -3% to -2.5%. Could be dens error?

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-04-23 14:29:15 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220/oxygen: init slope+intercept

autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:15 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220/salinity: init slope+intercept

autogenerated: using BOTsal (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:15 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - cfc11

Full surface saturation, consistent for CFC11 and CFC12. Tight relationship
between the CFCs. No adjustment recommended.

Posted by emje@norceresearch.no on 2013-01-09 13:44:15 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - cfc12

Full surface saturation, consistent for CFC11 and CFC12. Tight relationship
between the CFCs. No adjustment recommended.

Posted by emje@norceresearch.no on 2013-01-09 13:44:09 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - phosphate

New inversion for phosphate in the Atlantic with 10 core cruises assigned
suggests that the adjustment should be more than 0.97. The new mean offset of
1.048 supports this, aswell as most x-overs.
I suggest an adjustment of 0.96

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2012-11-23 22:03:14 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - oxygen

The inversion suggested a correction of 1.0259 based on two crossovers with a
mean offset of 0.998. Same situation as for above cruise. No option than to let
06AQ19960317 decide, i.e 1.01 adjustment. Not consistent with CARINA. Use
CARINA, no adjustment

Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-17 14:13:15 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - silicate

The inversion suggest a correction of 0.9251 and the mean offset is 1.066. This
is based on the xover with (3300)35MF19930123. Initially I recommend that this
cruise is adjusted using a factor of 0.93. CARINA suggest 0.9, at least
supporting that these data should be adjusted down compared to the other CIVA
cruise. Use CARINA, x0.9.

Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-15 12:33:56 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - phosphate

The Atlantic Ocean Suggested correction was 0.9617 and mean offset is 1.048.
Appears high in the crossover with, 06AQANTXIII_4 which is OK. Suggest
correction of 0.96. This is same direction but larger than CARINA adjustment of
0.97. Prefer CARINA suggested adjustment. This is consistent with IO decision.
The data have significant scatter (similar to 35MF19930123), do not flag 3/4 as
this will create huge hole in coverage, but add note in cruise summary table.

Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-11 13:34:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - nitrate

AO suggested correction is 0.9866 and mean offset is 1.040, but just two
crossovers. One towards 35MFCIVA_1, and this is nearly OK, whereas the one vs.
06AQANTXIII_4 indicates it is 1.06 too high. However, 06AQANTXIII_4 is low and
should go up by 1.05, Do not adjust. Not consistent with CARINA suggests 0.96.
Prefer CARINA suggested adjustment.

Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-03 09:50:38 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - salinity

The inversion suggest a correction of 0.14 ppm, based on 2 crossovers with a
mean offset of 1.587. Do not adjust. This is consistent with CARINA.

Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-08-31 11:22:09 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - oxygen

The inversion suggest a correction of 1.001 and the mean of the crossovers is
0.998. CARINA suggest that no adjustment should be applied, whereas GLODAP
applied an adjustment of -0.025 ml/L.
We suggest that no adjustment is applied.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-19 10:28:20 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - silicate

The inversion suggest a correction of 0.90 and the mean of the crossovers is
1.12. No adjustment was applied to GLODAP but CARINA suggested an adjustment of
0.90. The crossover to 320619960503 is 1.09.
We suggest to apply an adjustment of 0.90, in agreement with the suggestion from
CARINA.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-19 10:21:46 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - phosphate

The inversion suggest a correction of 0.95 and the mean of the crossovers is
1.02. No adjustment was applied to GLODAP but CARNIA suggest an adjustment of
0.97.
We suggest to follow the suggestion from CARINA; 0.97. This is particularly
motivated by the crossover with 320619960503.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-19 10:16:56 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - nitrate

The inversion suggest a correction of 0.94 and the mean of the crossovers is
1.048. No adjustment was applied to GLODAP but an adjustment of 0.96 was
suggested by CARINA.
It is clear that the nitrate values for this cruise is high.
We suggest to follow the adjustment suggested by CARINA; 0.96.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-19 10:13:12 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - alkalinity

The inversion suggest a correction of 0.8 and the mean of the crossovers is
-0.9. Both GLODAP and CARINA suggest that no adjustment is applied.
We suggest that no adjustment should be applied.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-19 10:07:50 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - tco2

The inversion suggest no correction and the mean of the crossovers is -1.8. Both
GLODAP and CARINA suggest that no adjustment is applied.
We suggest that no adjustment is applied.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-19 10:06:09 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - salinity

The IO inversion suggest a correction of -0.8 and the mean of the crossovers is
0.2. An adjustment of -0.5 is applied to GLODAP and no adjustment is suggested
by CARINA
We suggest that no adjustment is applied.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-19 10:03:26 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

cruise in both AO and IO

The adjustments listed here are from the Indian Ocean inversion only. Changes to
this can be possible when the Atlantic inversion is considered.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-19 09:58:34 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - nitrate

UPDATE
After correction of the whole dataset the cross overs still show small
systematic offsets (around 0.99), suggesting that the adjustment of 0.95 could
be too large.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 0.96 for nitrate
___________________
Paris, October 2008
Claire Lo Monaco

Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-11-01 12:26:36 UTC for data product: CARINA

35MF19960220 - salinity

Average of all cross-overs is: 0.2
Inversion analysis suggests an insignificant adjustment.
Cross-overs with other GLODAP cruises does not warrant an adjustment.
13 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-13 09:35:10 UTC for data product: CARINA

35MF19960220 - oxygen

Average of all cross-overs is: 0.998
Inversion analysis suggests an insignificant adjustment (1.002).
All cross-overs are very consistent.
I suggest NO adjustment of oxygen for cruise 35MF19960220.
11 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-11 10:13:05 UTC for data product: CARINA

35MF19960220 - silicate

Average of all cross-overs is: 1.128 (but especially that with cruise
74DI19950106 tends to increase the value strongly)
Inversion analysis suggests an adjustment of: 0.833
Considering the different cross-overs with their large variation, the offset of
silicate for cruise 35MF19960220 may have been overestimated. Cross-overs with
core cruises (06AQ19960317, 320619960503) suggest a smaller adjustment than that
suggested by the inversion.
I therefore suggest an adjustment of silicate for cruise 35MF19960220 amounting
to 0.90
11 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema

At the Paris meeting (17-18 June) we agreed on this adjustment, where additional
evidence came from the inversion analysis by Steven van Heuven.

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-11 10:09:10 UTC for data product: CARINA

35MF19960220 - phosphate

Average of all cross-overs is: 1.019
Inversion analysis suggests an adjustment of: 0.974
Cross-overs with core cruises do suggest that phosphate of cruise 35MF19960220
be too high.
I suggest an adjustment of phosphate for cruise 35MF19960220 of 0.98
10 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema
-
UPDATE
A new inversion analysis has been done (13 Oct. 2008), now with data to which
all suggested adjustments from the first round were applied. This new analysis
suggests a significant adjustment of 0.963, so phosphate still appears to be too
high.
I therefore suggest to modify the adjustment to 0.97
29 October 2008,
Mario Hoppema

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-10 15:02:28 UTC for data product: CARINA

35MF19960220 - nitrate

Average of all cross-overs is: 1.046
Inversion analysis suggests an adjustment of: 0.936
Comparison with other cruises including core cruises does suggest that nitrate
of cruise 35MF19960220 is too high indeed.
I suggest an adjustment of nitrate for cruise 35MF19960220 of 0.95
10 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-10 14:55:34 UTC for data product: CARINA

Hide comments

View other postings and files re. this adjustment

ReadMe file(s) for this cruise

View 0 ReadMe(s) (Lists all ReadMes)

Files and Comments for salinity

Files

Plot files re. Salinity
[+]:

Filename:	Comment:	Action…
unadjusted_06AQ19960317_35MF19960220_SAL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!]	View
unadjusted_09AR20060102_35MF19960220_SAL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!]	View
unadjusted_320619960503_35MF19960220_SAL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!]	View
unadjusted_33RR20080204_35MF19960220_SAL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!]	View
unadjusted_35MF19850224_35MF19960220_SAL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!]	View
unadjusted_35MF19930123_35MF19960220_SAL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!]	View
unadjusted_35MF19960220_74DI19950106_SAL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!]	View
unadjusted_740H20081226_35MF19960220_SAL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!]	View
xover_sum_35MF19960220_SAL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 35MF19960220 / 74DI19950106!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/salinity!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 35MF19960220 / 74DI19930206!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/salinity!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 35MF19930123 / 35MF19960220!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/salinity!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 35MF19960220 / 35MF19870114!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/salinity!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 35MF19930123 / 35MF19960220!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/salinity!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 35MF19960220 / 320619960503!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/salinity!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 06AQ19960317 / 35MF19960220!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/salinity!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 06AQ19960317 / 35MF19960220!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/salinity!]	View

Data files re. Salinity
[+]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:25 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220/salinity: update slope+intercept

autogenerated: only BOTsal available (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:44 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - salinity

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:37 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220/salinity: init slope+intercept

autogenerated: using BOTsal (no CTDsal)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:15 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - salinity

The inversion suggest a correction of 0.14 ppm, based on 2 crossovers with a
mean offset of 1.587. Do not adjust. This is consistent with CARINA.

Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-08-31 11:22:09 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - salinity

The IO inversion suggest a correction of -0.8 and the mean of the crossovers is
0.2. An adjustment of -0.5 is applied to GLODAP and no adjustment is suggested
by CARINA
We suggest that no adjustment is applied.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-19 10:03:26 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - salinity

Average of all cross-overs is: 0.2
Inversion analysis suggests an insignificant adjustment.
Cross-overs with other GLODAP cruises does not warrant an adjustment.
13 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-13 09:35:10 UTC for data product: CARINA

Hide comments

Files and Comments for ctd_salinity

Files

Plot files re. CTD-Sal. [+]
adj. - slope/intercept - action [ID]: - no files! -

Data files re. CTD-Sal. [+]
adj. - slope/intercept - action [ID]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by ctd_salinity in subject)

Files and Comments for tco2

Files

Plot files re. TCO₂
[+]:

Filename:	Comment:	Action…
unadjusted_06AQ19960317_35MF19960220_DIC.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!]	View
unadjusted_09AR20060102_35MF19960220_DIC.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!]	View
unadjusted_320619960503_35MF19960220_DIC.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!]	View
unadjusted_33RR20080204_35MF19960220_DIC.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!]	View
unadjusted_35MF19850224_35MF19960220_DIC.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!]	View
unadjusted_35MF19930123_35MF19960220_DIC.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!]	View
unadjusted_740H20081226_35MF19960220_DIC.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!]	View
xover_sum_35MF19960220_DIC.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of tco2 plot for crossover: 35MF19930123 / 35MF19960220!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/tco2!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of tco2 plot for crossover: 35MF19960220 / 35MF19870114!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/tco2!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of tco2 plot for crossover: 35MF19960220 / 320619960503!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/tco2!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of tco2 plot for crossover: 06AQ19960317 / 35MF19960220!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/tco2!]	View

Data files re. TCO₂
[+]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)

Files and Comments for alkalinity

Files

Plot files re. Alkalinity
[+]:

Filename:	Comment:	Action…
unadjusted_320619960503_35MF19960220_ALK.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/alkalinity!]	View
unadjusted_33RR20080204_35MF19960220_ALK.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/alkalinity!]	View
unadjusted_35MF19850224_35MF19960220_ALK.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/alkalinity!]	View
unadjusted_35MF19930123_35MF19960220_ALK.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/alkalinity!]	View
unadjusted_740H20081226_35MF19960220_ALK.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/alkalinity!]	View
xover_sum_35MF19960220_ALK.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/alkalinity!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of alkalinity plot for crossover: 35MF19930123 / 35MF19960220!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/alkalinity!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of alkalinity plot for crossover: 35MF19960220 / 35MF19870114!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/alkalinity!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of alkalinity plot for crossover: 35MF19960220 / 320619960503!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/alkalinity!]	View

Data files re. Alkalinity
[+]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)

Files and Comments for ph

Files

Plot files re. pH
[+]: - no files! -

Data files re. pH
[+]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)

35MF19960220 - ph

Changed adjustment to -999 as there are not measured pH, only calculated

Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-11-04 10:53:09 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - phosphate

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : change to 0.97 for good
fit with 33RR20080204

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:37 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - phosphate

Changed to 0.97 based on recent 2step inversions (which ignored the many
confounding results from OISO and 74DIxxx)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-04-23 14:32:25 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - phosphate

New inversion for phosphate in the Atlantic with 10 core cruises assigned
suggests that the adjustment should be more than 0.97. The new mean offset of
1.048 supports this, aswell as most x-overs.
I suggest an adjustment of 0.96

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2012-11-23 22:03:14 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - phosphate

The Atlantic Ocean Suggested correction was 0.9617 and mean offset is 1.048.
Appears high in the crossover with, 06AQANTXIII_4 which is OK. Suggest
correction of 0.96. This is same direction but larger than CARINA adjustment of
0.97. Prefer CARINA suggested adjustment. This is consistent with IO decision.
The data have significant scatter (similar to 35MF19930123), do not flag 3/4 as
this will create huge hole in coverage, but add note in cruise summary table.

Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-11 13:34:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - phosphate

The inversion suggest a correction of 0.95 and the mean of the crossovers is
1.02. No adjustment was applied to GLODAP but CARNIA suggest an adjustment of
0.97.
We suggest to follow the suggestion from CARINA; 0.97. This is particularly
motivated by the crossover with 320619960503.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-19 10:16:56 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - phosphate

Average of all cross-overs is: 1.019
Inversion analysis suggests an adjustment of: 0.974
Cross-overs with core cruises do suggest that phosphate of cruise 35MF19960220
be too high.
I suggest an adjustment of phosphate for cruise 35MF19960220 of 0.98
10 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema
-
UPDATE
A new inversion analysis has been done (13 Oct. 2008), now with data to which
all suggested adjustments from the first round were applied. This new analysis
suggests a significant adjustment of 0.963, so phosphate still appears to be too
high.
I therefore suggest to modify the adjustment to 0.97
29 October 2008,
Mario Hoppema

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-10 15:02:28 UTC for data product: CARINA

Hide comments

Files and Comments for pco2

Files

Plot files re. pCO₂
[+]: - no files! -

Data files re. pCO₂
[+]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by pco2 in subject)

Files and Comments for nitrate

Files

Plot files re. Nitrate
[x]:

Filename:	Comment:	Action…
unadjusted_06AQ19960317_35MF19960220_NO3.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR20060102_35MF19960220_NO3.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!]	View
unadjusted_320619960503_35MF19960220_NO3.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!]	View
unadjusted_33RR20080204_35MF19960220_NO3.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!]	View
unadjusted_35MF19850224_35MF19960220_NO3.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!]	View
unadjusted_35MF19930123_35MF19960220_NO3.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!]	View
unadjusted_35MF19960220_74DI19950106_NO3.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!]	View
unadjusted_740H20081226_35MF19960220_NO3.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!]	View
xover_sum_35MF19960220_NO3.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of nitrate plot for crossover: 35MF19960220 / 74DI19950106!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/nitrate!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of nitrate plot for crossover: 35MF19960220 / 35MF19870114!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/nitrate!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of nitrate plot for crossover: 35MF19960220 / 320619960503!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/nitrate!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of nitrate plot for crossover: 06AQ19960317 / 35MF19960220!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/nitrate!]	View

Data files re. Nitrate
[x]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)

Autogenerated comment - nitrate

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : chage to 0.97. Clear
improvement from inverting.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:37 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - nitrate

Changed to 0.97. Recent 2step inversions (large scale and local, always ignoring
OISO and SW Indian 74DIxxx cruises) gives -3% to -2.5%. Could be dens error?

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-04-23 14:29:15 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - nitrate

AO suggested correction is 0.9866 and mean offset is 1.040, but just two
crossovers. One towards 35MFCIVA_1, and this is nearly OK, whereas the one vs.
06AQANTXIII_4 indicates it is 1.06 too high. However, 06AQANTXIII_4 is low and
should go up by 1.05, Do not adjust. Not consistent with CARINA suggests 0.96.
Prefer CARINA suggested adjustment.

Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-03 09:50:38 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - nitrate

The inversion suggest a correction of 0.94 and the mean of the crossovers is
1.048. No adjustment was applied to GLODAP but an adjustment of 0.96 was
suggested by CARINA.
It is clear that the nitrate values for this cruise is high.
We suggest to follow the adjustment suggested by CARINA; 0.96.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-19 10:13:12 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - nitrate

UPDATE
After correction of the whole dataset the cross overs still show small
systematic offsets (around 0.99), suggesting that the adjustment of 0.95 could
be too large.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 0.96 for nitrate
___________________
Paris, October 2008
Claire Lo Monaco

Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-11-01 12:26:36 UTC for data product: CARINA

35MF19960220 - nitrate

Average of all cross-overs is: 1.046
Inversion analysis suggests an adjustment of: 0.936
Comparison with other cruises including core cruises does suggest that nitrate
of cruise 35MF19960220 is too high indeed.
I suggest an adjustment of nitrate for cruise 35MF19960220 of 0.95
10 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-10 14:55:34 UTC for data product: CARINA

Hide comments

Files and Comments for phosphate

Files

Plot files re. Phosphate
[x]:

Filename:	Comment:	Action…
unadjusted_06AQ19960317_35MF19960220_PO4.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!]	View
unadjusted_320619960503_35MF19960220_PO4.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!]	View
unadjusted_33RR20080204_35MF19960220_PO4.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!]	View
unadjusted_35MF19850224_35MF19960220_PO4.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!]	View
unadjusted_35MF19930123_35MF19960220_PO4.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!]	View
unadjusted_35MF19960220_74DI19950106_PO4.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!]	View
unadjusted_740H20081226_35MF19960220_PO4.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!]	View
xover_sum_35MF19960220_PO4.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of phosphate plot for crossover: 35MF19930123 / 35MF19960220!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/phosphate!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of phosphate plot for crossover: 35MF19960220 / 35MF19870114!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/phosphate!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of phosphate plot for crossover: 06AQ19960317 / 35MF19960220!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/phosphate!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of phosphate plot for crossover: 35MF19930123 / 35MF19960220!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/phosphate!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of phosphate plot for crossover: 35MF19960220 / 320619960503!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/phosphate!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of phosphate plot for crossover: 06AQ19960317 / 35MF19960220!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/phosphate!]	View

Data files re. Phosphate
[x]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)

Autogenerated comment - phosphate

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : change to 0.97 for good
fit with 33RR20080204

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:37 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - phosphate

Changed to 0.97 based on recent 2step inversions (which ignored the many
confounding results from OISO and 74DIxxx)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-04-23 14:32:25 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - phosphate

New inversion for phosphate in the Atlantic with 10 core cruises assigned
suggests that the adjustment should be more than 0.97. The new mean offset of
1.048 supports this, aswell as most x-overs.
I suggest an adjustment of 0.96

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2012-11-23 22:03:14 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - phosphate

The Atlantic Ocean Suggested correction was 0.9617 and mean offset is 1.048.
Appears high in the crossover with, 06AQANTXIII_4 which is OK. Suggest
correction of 0.96. This is same direction but larger than CARINA adjustment of
0.97. Prefer CARINA suggested adjustment. This is consistent with IO decision.
The data have significant scatter (similar to 35MF19930123), do not flag 3/4 as
this will create huge hole in coverage, but add note in cruise summary table.

Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-11 13:34:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - phosphate

The inversion suggest a correction of 0.95 and the mean of the crossovers is
1.02. No adjustment was applied to GLODAP but CARNIA suggest an adjustment of
0.97.
We suggest to follow the suggestion from CARINA; 0.97. This is particularly
motivated by the crossover with 320619960503.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-19 10:16:56 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - phosphate

Average of all cross-overs is: 1.019
Inversion analysis suggests an adjustment of: 0.974
Cross-overs with core cruises do suggest that phosphate of cruise 35MF19960220
be too high.
I suggest an adjustment of phosphate for cruise 35MF19960220 of 0.98
10 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema
-
UPDATE
A new inversion analysis has been done (13 Oct. 2008), now with data to which
all suggested adjustments from the first round were applied. This new analysis
suggests a significant adjustment of 0.963, so phosphate still appears to be too
high.
I therefore suggest to modify the adjustment to 0.97
29 October 2008,
Mario Hoppema

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-10 15:02:28 UTC for data product: CARINA

Hide comments

Files and Comments for silicate

Files

Plot files re. Silicate
[x]:

Filename:	Comment:	Action…
unadjusted_06AQ19960317_35MF19960220_SIL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!]	View
unadjusted_09AR20060102_35MF19960220_SIL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!]	View
unadjusted_320619960503_35MF19960220_SIL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!]	View
unadjusted_33RR20080204_35MF19960220_SIL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!]	View
unadjusted_35MF19850224_35MF19960220_SIL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!]	View
unadjusted_35MF19930123_35MF19960220_SIL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!]	View
unadjusted_35MF19960220_74DI19950106_SIL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!]	View
unadjusted_740H20081226_35MF19960220_SIL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!]	View
xover_sum_35MF19960220_SIL.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 35MF19930123 / 35MF19960220!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/silicate!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 35MF19930123 / 35MF19960220!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/silicate!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 06AQ19960317 / 35MF19960220!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/silicate!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 35MF19960220 / 74DI19950106!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/silicate!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 35MF19930123 / 35MF19960220!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/silicate!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 35MF19960220 / 35MF19870114!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/silicate!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 35MF19960220 / 320619960503!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/silicate!]	View

Data files re. Silicate
[x]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)

Autogenerated comment - silicate

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 0.91, which better
matches the inversion result. Terrible spread in northerly profiles. QC1

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:37 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - silicate

changes slightly to 0.91 based on recent 2step inversion.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-04-23 14:33:39 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - silicate

The inversion suggest a correction of 0.9251 and the mean offset is 1.066. This
is based on the xover with (3300)35MF19930123. Initially I recommend that this
cruise is adjusted using a factor of 0.93. CARINA suggest 0.9, at least
supporting that these data should be adjusted down compared to the other CIVA
cruise. Use CARINA, x0.9.

Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-15 12:33:56 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - silicate

The inversion suggest a correction of 0.90 and the mean of the crossovers is
1.12. No adjustment was applied to GLODAP but CARINA suggested an adjustment of
0.90. The crossover to 320619960503 is 1.09.
We suggest to apply an adjustment of 0.90, in agreement with the suggestion from
CARINA.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-19 10:21:46 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - silicate

Average of all cross-overs is: 1.128 (but especially that with cruise
74DI19950106 tends to increase the value strongly)
Inversion analysis suggests an adjustment of: 0.833
Considering the different cross-overs with their large variation, the offset of
silicate for cruise 35MF19960220 may have been overestimated. Cross-overs with
core cruises (06AQ19960317, 320619960503) suggest a smaller adjustment than that
suggested by the inversion.
I therefore suggest an adjustment of silicate for cruise 35MF19960220 amounting
to 0.90
11 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema

At the Paris meeting (17-18 June) we agreed on this adjustment, where additional
evidence came from the inversion analysis by Steven van Heuven.

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-11 10:09:10 UTC for data product: CARINA

Hide comments

Files and Comments for oxygen

Files

Plot files re. Oxygen
[x]:

Filename:	Comment:	Action…
unadjusted_06AQ19960317_35MF19960220_O2.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!]	View
unadjusted_09AR20060102_35MF19960220_O2.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!]	View
unadjusted_320619960503_35MF19960220_O2.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!]	View
unadjusted_33RR20080204_35MF19960220_O2.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!]	View
unadjusted_35MF19850224_35MF19960220_O2.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!]	View
unadjusted_35MF19930123_35MF19960220_O2.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!]	View
unadjusted_35MF19960220_74DI19950106_O2.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!]	View
unadjusted_740H20081226_35MF19960220_O2.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!]	View
xover_sum_35MF19960220_O2.pdf	[autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of oxygen plot for crossover: 35MF19930123 / 35MF19960220!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/oxygen!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of oxygen plot for crossover: 06AQ19960317 / 35MF19960220!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_are/oxygen!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of oxygen plot for crossover: 35MF19960220 / 74DI19950106!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/oxygen!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of oxygen plot for crossover: 35MF19930123 / 35MF19960220!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/oxygen!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of oxygen plot for crossover: 35MF19960220 / 35MF19870114!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/oxygen!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of oxygen plot for crossover: 35MF19960220 / 320619960503!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/oxygen!]	View
Xover.png	[Copy of oxygen plot for crossover: 06AQ19960317 / 35MF19960220!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/oxygen!]	View

Data files re. Oxygen
[x]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:25 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220/oxygen: update slope+intercept

autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:44 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - oxygen

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:37 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220/oxygen: init slope+intercept

autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:15 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - oxygen

The inversion suggested a correction of 1.0259 based on two crossovers with a
mean offset of 0.998. Same situation as for above cruise. No option than to let
06AQ19960317 decide, i.e 1.01 adjustment. Not consistent with CARINA. Use
CARINA, no adjustment

Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-17 14:13:15 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - oxygen

The inversion suggest a correction of 1.001 and the mean of the crossovers is
0.998. CARINA suggest that no adjustment should be applied, whereas GLODAP
applied an adjustment of -0.025 ml/L.
We suggest that no adjustment is applied.

Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2012-07-19 10:28:20 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19960220 - oxygen

Average of all cross-overs is: 0.998
Inversion analysis suggests an insignificant adjustment (1.002).
All cross-overs are very consistent.
I suggest NO adjustment of oxygen for cruise 35MF19960220.
11 June 2008,
Mario Hoppema

Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2008-06-11 10:13:05 UTC for data product: CARINA

Hide comments

Files and Comments for ctd_oxygen

Files

Plot files re. CTD-Oxyg. [x]
adj. - slope/intercept - action [ID]: - no files! -

Data files re. CTD-Oxyg. [x]
adj. - slope/intercept - action [ID]: - no files! -

Dataproduct: GLODAPv2 :: Adjustments

Cruise: 35MF19960220 (dataset:CARINA) Data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023 Predecessor: CARINA

Please wait while loading list of related files…

35MF19960220 - ph

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

35MF19960220/oxygen: update slope+intercept

35MF19960220/salinity: update slope+intercept

Autogenerated comment - oxygen

Autogenerated comment - silicate

Autogenerated comment - phosphate

Autogenerated comment - nitrate

Autogenerated comment - alkalinity

Autogenerated comment - tCO2

Autogenerated comment - salinity

35MF19960220 - silicate

35MF19960220 - phosphate

35MF19960220 - nitrate

35MF19960220/oxygen: init slope+intercept

35MF19960220/salinity: init slope+intercept

35MF19960220 - cfc11

35MF19960220 - cfc12

35MF19960220 - phosphate

35MF19960220 - oxygen

35MF19960220 - silicate

35MF19960220 - phosphate

35MF19960220 - nitrate

35MF19960220 - salinity

35MF19960220 - oxygen

35MF19960220 - silicate

35MF19960220 - phosphate

35MF19960220 - nitrate

35MF19960220 - alkalinity

35MF19960220 - tco2

35MF19960220 - salinity

cruise in both AO and IO

35MF19960220 - nitrate

35MF19960220 - salinity

35MF19960220 - oxygen

35MF19960220 - silicate

35MF19960220 - phosphate

35MF19960220 - nitrate

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

35MF19960220/salinity: update slope+intercept

Autogenerated comment - salinity

35MF19960220/salinity: init slope+intercept

35MF19960220 - salinity

35MF19960220 - salinity

35MF19960220 - salinity

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

Autogenerated comment - tCO2

35MF19960220 - tco2

Autogenerated comment - alkalinity

35MF19960220 - alkalinity

35MF19960220 - ph

Autogenerated comment - phosphate

35MF19960220 - phosphate

35MF19960220 - phosphate

35MF19960220 - phosphate

35MF19960220 - phosphate

35MF19960220 - phosphate

Autogenerated comment - nitrate

35MF19960220 - nitrate

35MF19960220 - nitrate

35MF19960220 - nitrate

35MF19960220 - nitrate

35MF19960220 - nitrate

Autogenerated comment - phosphate

35MF19960220 - phosphate

35MF19960220 - phosphate

35MF19960220 - phosphate

35MF19960220 - phosphate

35MF19960220 - phosphate

Autogenerated comment - silicate

35MF19960220 - silicate

35MF19960220 - silicate

35MF19960220 - silicate

35MF19960220 - silicate

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

35MF19960220/oxygen: update slope+intercept

Autogenerated comment - oxygen