GLODAPv2 Adjustments

Stations:	[1-last]
The selected Calculated Carbon Parameter has been dismissed in October 2017! Legacy values will be exported as is and displayed in red with subscript "c", e.g. -0.123456_c! No data available? Insert -999 No suggestion for adjustment possible? Insert -888 To calibrate CTDsal use: CTDsal_calibrated = (CTDsal - CTDsal_intercept) / CTDsal_slope To calibrate CTDoxy use: CTDoxy_calibrated = (CTDoxy - CTDoxy_intercept) / CTDoxy_slope
Insert your commit message below explaining your change(s) before you save…
Salinity [+]
CTD-Sal. [+] slope/intercept - action [ID]	/ - #
TCO₂ [+]
Alkalinity [+]
pH [+]
pCO₂ [+]
Nitrate [x]
Phosphate [x]
Silicate [x]
Oxygen [x]
CTD-Oxyg. [x] slope/intercept - action [ID]	/ - #
CFC12 [x]
CFC11 [x]
CFC113 [x]
CCl4 [x]
C13 [+]
SF6 [x]

Cruise Info

Annotations for this cruise:

View 0 annotation(s) (Lists all annotations)

Files for Adjustment Plot files re. Cruise:

Filename:	Comment:	Action…
RC_SO.png	[autogenerated from RC_Toste/adjustments!]	View
manualXovers.png	[autogenerated from manual_xovers/adjustments!]	View

Data files re. Cruise: - no files! -

Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
cruise:2

Plot files re. Cluster: - no files! -

Comments re. this cruise in GLODAPv2

View 21 comment(s) (Lists all comments)

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:6; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:5; CTD oxygen data good, setting CTD oxygen offset and QC flag
to bottle values.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:25 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - silicate

Automated update setting data quality flag from BAD to GOOD in order to retain
these non-QCed data in final product. SvH/GLODAPv2 / 2015-01-19)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-20 14:46:46 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - alkalinity

Automated update setting data quality flag from BAD to GOOD in order to retain
these non-QCed data in final product. SvH/GLODAPv2 / 2015-01-19)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-20 14:46:46 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19980121/oxygen: update slope+intercept

autogenerated: BOToxy is compatible with unchanged CTDoxy

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:44 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19980121/salinity: update slope+intercept

autogenerated: BOTsal is compatible with CALIBRATED CTDsal

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:44 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19980121 - salinity

Manually set CTDsal calibration for this cruise, to avoid CTDsal data being
lost.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-15 21:11:27 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - oxygen

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain, only xovers its
sister 35MF cruises. However, 35MF1985 is well-constrained against the wider
W-IND,

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:37 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - silicate

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain. I cannot solve
these 35MF cruises for Silicate, and by this stage will happily just accept
anything Clair suggested for them.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:37 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - phosphate

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:37 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - nitrate

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : set to 1

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:37 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - alkalinity

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : set to -888

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:37 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - tCO2

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:37 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - salinity

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : Make +0.007, very clear
offsets

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:37 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19980121/oxygen: init slope+intercept

autogenerated: using mean of BOToxy and fitted CTDoxy.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:15 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19980121/salinity: init slope+intercept

autogenerated: using BOTsal because bad fit of CTDsal

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:15 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19980121 - oxygen

OISO1: only one deep profile (at 56°S).
INTERNAL OISO CONSISTENCY:
6 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is 1.012 (+/-0.029).
4 cross overs show no significant differences (<1%), and 3 of them involve
cruises that are thought to have no offset in oxygen. When the offsets suggested
for the other cruises are taken into account the average of all cross overs is
1.001 (+/-0.005). This suggests that no adjustment would be required.
OTHER CROSS OVERS:
The cross over with the cruise INDIGO3 shows a ratio of 1.004 (+/-0.007), which
supports the analysis above.
CONCLUSION:
Based on the regional analyses above I suggest no adjustment for oxygen.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco

Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-21 13:05:15 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19980121 - silicate

OISO1: only one deep profile (at 56°S).
INTERNAL OISO CONSISTENCY:
6 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is 0.988 (+/-0.047).
Only 2 cross overs show no significant differences (<2%). The one that involves
a cruise that is thought to have no offset in silicate shows an offset of 0.98
(+/-0.01). When the offsets suggested for the other cruises as well as the
suggested natural variability are taken into account the average of all cross
overs is 0.979 (+/-0.002). This suggests that a small adjustment could be
required, but it is not warranted since Antarctic deep waters are entitled to
natural variability which could play a role in the observed differences (all
cross overs are found at 56°S).
OTHER CROSS OVERS:
The cross over with the cruise INDIGO3 shows a ratio of 0.919 (+/-0.013), but
INDIGO3 is thought to have high silicate values. When the suggested offset is
taken into account as well as the suggested natural variability, a good
agreement is found with the analysis above (0.977).
CONCLUSION:
Given the large uncertainty attached to the regional analyses above due to
natural variability in the Antarctic region, I have no recommendation for
silicate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco

Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-21 13:04:54 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19980121 - nitrate

OISO1: only one deep profile (at 56°S).
INTERNAL OISO CONSISTENCY:
6 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is 0.973 (+/-0.056).
Only 2 cross overs show no significant differences (<2%), only 1 of them
involving a cruise that is thought to have no offset in nitrate. When the
offsets suggested for the other cruises are taken into account the average of
all cross overs is 0.978 (+/-0.058). The large scatter around the mean suggests
that natural variability could also play a role in the observed differences.
OTHER CROSS OVERS:
The cross over with the cruise INDIGO3 shows a ratio of 1.034 (+/-0.022), but
INDIGO3 is thought to have low nitrate values. When the suggested offset is
taken into account as well as the suggested natural variability, no significant
difference is found (1.001).
CONCLUSION:
Given the large uncertainty attached to the regional analyses above due to
natural variability in the Antarctic region, I have no recommendation for
nitrate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco

Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-21 13:04:12 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19980121 - alkalinity

OISO1: only one deep profile (at 56°S).
INTERNAL OISO CONSISTENCY:
5 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is +5.7 (+/-2.4)
umol/kg.
2 cross overs show no significant differences (<5 umol/kg) and involve cruises
that were conducted only 1 or 2 years after this one. This suggests that no
adjustment would be required.
Interestingly, differences in alkalinity increase with time, from +2 umol/kg
over a 1 year-period to +8 umol/kg over 6 years. The dependence with time
suggests that the differences observed are not systematic offsets, but would
rather be a real signal (gradual decrease in alkalinity in Antarctic deep
waters). Note that when assuming a gradual decrease of 1 umol/kg/yr all cross
overs suggest no significant offset.
OTHER CROSS OVERS:
The cross over with the cruise INDIGO3 (conducted 11 years before this one and
known to have no offset in TCO2) shows a difference of -9.6 (+/-3.5) umol/kg,
but when accounting for a decrease in alkalinity of 11 umol/kg it translates
into no significant differences. This supports the analysis above.
CONCLUSION:
Based on the regional analyses above I suggest no adjustment for alkalinity.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco

Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-08 23:40:46 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19980121 - tco2

OISO1: only one deep profile (at 56°S).
INTERNAL OISO CONSISTENCY:
6 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is +1.3 (+/-3.3)
umol/kg.
5 cross overs show no significant differences (<4 umol/kg) and involve cruises
that are thought to have no offset in TCO2. When the offsets suggested for the
other cruises are taken into account the average of all cross overs is -0.3
(+/-1.1) umol/kg. This suggests that no adjustment would be required.
OTHER CROSS OVERS:
The cross over with cruise INDIGO3 shows an offset of -6.0 (+/-2.7) umol/kg, but
INDIGO3 is known to have high TCO2 values by about 5-6 umol/kg (according to
this study and GLODAP). This supports no adjustment.
CONCLUSION:
Based on the regional analyses above I suggest no adjustment for TCO2.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco

Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-08 23:39:58 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19980121 - salinity

OISO1: only one deep profile (at 56°S).
INTERNAL OISO CONSISTENCY:
6 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is -0.4 (+/-12.3)
ppm.
3 cross overs show no significant differences (<5 ppm) and involve cruises that
are thought to have no significant offset in salinity. When the offsets
suggested for the other cruises are taken into account the average of all cross
overs is +3.9 (+/-1.4) ppm. This suggests that no adjustment would be required.
OTHER CROSS OVERS:
The cross over with cruise INDIGO3 shows an offset of +1 (+/-7) ppm, which
supports no adjustment.
CONCLUSION:
Based on the regional analyses above I suggest no adjustment for salinity.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco

Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-08 23:39:34 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Hide comments

View other postings and files re. this adjustment

ReadMe file(s) for this cruise

View 1 ReadMe(s) (Lists all ReadMes)

Files and Comments for salinity

Files

Plot files re. Salinity
[+]: - no files! -

Data files re. Salinity
[+]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:6; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:5; CTD oxygen data good, setting CTD oxygen offset and QC flag
to bottle values.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:25 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19980121/salinity: update slope+intercept

autogenerated: BOTsal is compatible with CALIBRATED CTDsal

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:44 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19980121 - salinity

Manually set CTDsal calibration for this cruise, to avoid CTDsal data being
lost.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-15 21:11:27 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - salinity

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : Make +0.007, very clear
offsets

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:37 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19980121/salinity: init slope+intercept

autogenerated: using BOTsal because bad fit of CTDsal

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:15 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19980121 - salinity

OISO1: only one deep profile (at 56°S).
INTERNAL OISO CONSISTENCY:
6 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is -0.4 (+/-12.3)
ppm.
3 cross overs show no significant differences (<5 ppm) and involve cruises that
are thought to have no significant offset in salinity. When the offsets
suggested for the other cruises are taken into account the average of all cross
overs is +3.9 (+/-1.4) ppm. This suggests that no adjustment would be required.
OTHER CROSS OVERS:
The cross over with cruise INDIGO3 shows an offset of +1 (+/-7) ppm, which
supports no adjustment.
CONCLUSION:
Based on the regional analyses above I suggest no adjustment for salinity.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco

Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-08 23:39:34 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Hide comments

Files and Comments for ctd_salinity

Files

Plot files re. CTD-Sal. [+]
adj. - slope/intercept - action [ID]: - no files! -

Data files re. CTD-Sal. [+]
adj. - slope/intercept - action [ID]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by ctd_salinity in subject)

Files and Comments for tco2

Files

Plot files re. TCO₂
[+]: - no files! -

Data files re. TCO₂
[+]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)

Files and Comments for alkalinity

Files

Plot files re. Alkalinity
[+]: - no files! -

Data files re. Alkalinity
[+]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)

Autogenerated comment - alkalinity

Automated update setting data quality flag from BAD to GOOD in order to retain
these non-QCed data in final product. SvH/GLODAPv2 / 2015-01-19)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-20 14:46:46 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - alkalinity

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : set to -888

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:37 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19980121 - alkalinity

OISO1: only one deep profile (at 56°S).
INTERNAL OISO CONSISTENCY:
5 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is +5.7 (+/-2.4)
umol/kg.
2 cross overs show no significant differences (<5 umol/kg) and involve cruises
that were conducted only 1 or 2 years after this one. This suggests that no
adjustment would be required.
Interestingly, differences in alkalinity increase with time, from +2 umol/kg
over a 1 year-period to +8 umol/kg over 6 years. The dependence with time
suggests that the differences observed are not systematic offsets, but would
rather be a real signal (gradual decrease in alkalinity in Antarctic deep
waters). Note that when assuming a gradual decrease of 1 umol/kg/yr all cross
overs suggest no significant offset.
OTHER CROSS OVERS:
The cross over with the cruise INDIGO3 (conducted 11 years before this one and
known to have no offset in TCO2) shows a difference of -9.6 (+/-3.5) umol/kg,
but when accounting for a decrease in alkalinity of 11 umol/kg it translates
into no significant differences. This supports the analysis above.
CONCLUSION:
Based on the regional analyses above I suggest no adjustment for alkalinity.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco

Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-08 23:40:46 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Hide comments

Files and Comments for ph

Files

Plot files re. pH
[+]: - no files! -

Data files re. pH
[+]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)

Files and Comments for pco2

Files

Plot files re. pCO₂
[+]: - no files! -

Data files re. pCO₂
[+]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by pco2 in subject)

Files and Comments for nitrate

Files

Plot files re. Nitrate
[x]: - no files! -

Data files re. Nitrate
[x]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)

Files and Comments for phosphate

Files

Plot files re. Phosphate
[x]: - no files! -

Data files re. Phosphate
[x]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)

Files and Comments for silicate

Files

Plot files re. Silicate
[x]: - no files! -

Data files re. Silicate
[x]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)

Autogenerated comment - silicate

Automated update setting data quality flag from BAD to GOOD in order to retain
these non-QCed data in final product. SvH/GLODAPv2 / 2015-01-19)

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-20 14:46:46 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - silicate

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain. I cannot solve
these 35MF cruises for Silicate, and by this stage will happily just accept
anything Clair suggested for them.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:37 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19980121 - silicate

OISO1: only one deep profile (at 56°S).
INTERNAL OISO CONSISTENCY:
6 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is 0.988 (+/-0.047).
Only 2 cross overs show no significant differences (<2%). The one that involves
a cruise that is thought to have no offset in silicate shows an offset of 0.98
(+/-0.01). When the offsets suggested for the other cruises as well as the
suggested natural variability are taken into account the average of all cross
overs is 0.979 (+/-0.002). This suggests that a small adjustment could be
required, but it is not warranted since Antarctic deep waters are entitled to
natural variability which could play a role in the observed differences (all
cross overs are found at 56°S).
OTHER CROSS OVERS:
The cross over with the cruise INDIGO3 shows a ratio of 0.919 (+/-0.013), but
INDIGO3 is thought to have high silicate values. When the suggested offset is
taken into account as well as the suggested natural variability, a good
agreement is found with the analysis above (0.977).
CONCLUSION:
Given the large uncertainty attached to the regional analyses above due to
natural variability in the Antarctic region, I have no recommendation for
silicate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco

Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-21 13:04:54 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Hide comments

Files and Comments for oxygen

Files

Plot files re. Oxygen
[x]: - no files! -

Data files re. Oxygen
[x]: - no files! -

View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:6; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:5; CTD oxygen data good, setting CTD oxygen offset and QC flag
to bottle values.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:25 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19980121/oxygen: update slope+intercept

autogenerated: BOToxy is compatible with unchanged CTDoxy

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:44 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Autogenerated comment - oxygen

Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain, only xovers its
sister 35MF cruises. However, 35MF1985 is well-constrained against the wider
W-IND,

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:37 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19980121/oxygen: init slope+intercept

autogenerated: using mean of BOToxy and fitted CTDoxy.

Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:15 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

35MF19980121 - oxygen

OISO1: only one deep profile (at 56°S).
INTERNAL OISO CONSISTENCY:
6 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is 1.012 (+/-0.029).
4 cross overs show no significant differences (<1%), and 3 of them involve
cruises that are thought to have no offset in oxygen. When the offsets suggested
for the other cruises are taken into account the average of all cross overs is
1.001 (+/-0.005). This suggests that no adjustment would be required.
OTHER CROSS OVERS:
The cross over with the cruise INDIGO3 shows a ratio of 1.004 (+/-0.007), which
supports the analysis above.
CONCLUSION:
Based on the regional analyses above I suggest no adjustment for oxygen.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco

Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-21 13:05:15 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Hide comments

Files and Comments for ctd_oxygen

Files

Plot files re. CTD-Oxyg. [x]
adj. - slope/intercept - action [ID]: - no files! -

Data files re. CTD-Oxyg. [x]
adj. - slope/intercept - action [ID]: - no files! -

Dataproduct: GLODAPv2 :: Adjustments

Cruise: 35MF19980121 (dataset:CARINA) Data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023

Please wait while loading list of related files…

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

Autogenerated comment - silicate

Autogenerated comment - alkalinity

35MF19980121/oxygen: update slope+intercept

35MF19980121/salinity: update slope+intercept

35MF19980121 - salinity

Autogenerated comment - oxygen

Autogenerated comment - silicate

Autogenerated comment - phosphate

Autogenerated comment - nitrate

Autogenerated comment - alkalinity

Autogenerated comment - tCO2

Autogenerated comment - salinity

35MF19980121/oxygen: init slope+intercept

35MF19980121/salinity: init slope+intercept

35MF19980121 - oxygen

35MF19980121 - silicate

35MF19980121 - nitrate

35MF19980121 - alkalinity

35MF19980121 - tco2

35MF19980121 - salinity

35MF19980121 - 2008-06-17 14:28:38 - version: 0Posted on 2008-06-17 14:28:38 - last updated on 2008-06-17 14:28:38 as version number 0

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

35MF19980121/salinity: update slope+intercept

35MF19980121 - salinity

Autogenerated comment - salinity

35MF19980121/salinity: init slope+intercept

35MF19980121 - salinity

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

Autogenerated comment - tCO2

35MF19980121 - tco2

Autogenerated comment - alkalinity

Autogenerated comment - alkalinity

35MF19980121 - alkalinity

Autogenerated comment - phosphate

Autogenerated comment - nitrate

35MF19980121 - nitrate

Autogenerated comment - phosphate

Autogenerated comment - silicate

Autogenerated comment - silicate

35MF19980121 - silicate

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update

35MF19980121/oxygen: update slope+intercept

Autogenerated comment - oxygen

35MF19980121/oxygen: init slope+intercept

35MF19980121 - oxygen

Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update