Cruise: 61TG20020206 (dataset:CARINA) Data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: JARE43; 61TG20020206; JARE43;
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment is a published version for GLODAPv2!
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
RC_SO.png | [autogenerated from RC_Toste/adjustments!] |
View | |
manualXovers.png | [autogenerated from manual_xovers/adjustments!] |
View |
- no files! -
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
cruise:2
nitrate:11
oxygen:11
phosphate:10
salinity:11
silicate:11
tco2:6
- no files! -
View 1 ReadMe(s) (Lists all ReadMes)
61TG20020206 - 2008-06-17 14:28:33 - version: 0Posted on 2008-06-17 14:28:33 - last updated on 2008-06-17 14:28:33 as version number 0
DATE this file initialized 9/4/07
Data from M. Ishii
Cruise dates: 2/6-3/7/2002
Chief Scientist: T. Odate
Ship and cruise designation:Tangaroa; JARE43
EXPOCODE: 61TG20020206
Region:Meridional section at 140E from Antarctica to 60S
8 stations
Hydro: Who - S.Aoki; Status - final; S Plus - up to date
Notes:
Nuts/O2: Who - S.Watanabe; Status - final; S Plus - up to date
Notes: O2 converted from mL/L to umol/Kg with theta at
sampling pressure (by provider)
Nuts converted from umol/L to umol/kg assuming T=25C (by provider)
Includes ammonium
TCO2: Who - M. Ishii; Status - final; S Plus - up to date
Notes: Corrected to Japanese prepared CRM which were back- referenced to Dickson CRM batch #54
TA: Who - ; Status - not measured; S Plus -
Notes:
fCO2: Who - ; Status - not measured; S Plus -
Notes:
pH: Who - ; Status - not measured; S Plus -
Notes:
CFC: Who - ; Status - no data yet; S Plus -
Notes: samples returned to shore for analysis
C-14: Who - ; Status - not measured; S Plus -
Notes:
C-13: Who - G.Hshida; Status - no data yet; S Plus -
Notes:
H-3/He-3: Who - ; Status - not measured; S Plus -
Notes:
Other: Chloroa
References:
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:15 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
61TG20020206/salinity: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: BOTsal is compatible with unchanged CTDsal
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:45 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - salinity
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:46 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
61TG20020206/salinity: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using mean of BOTsal and fitted CTDsal
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:15 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
61TG20020206 - salinity
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is -1.7 ppm.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests an adjustment of +7.1 (+/-6.6 ppm).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
8 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is -2.9 (+/-6.3)
ppm.
6 cross overs show no significant differences (<5 ppm) and involve cruises that
are thought to have no significant offsets in salinity. When the offset
suggested for the other cruises are taken into account, the average of all cross
overs is -2.1 (+/-3.0) ppm. This suggests that no adjustment would be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses disagree: the former suggests that an
adjustment of +7 ppm could be required, whereas the regional analysis suggests
no adjustment. The latter is preferred because of the large uncertainty
associated with the global inversion.
Based on this I suggest no adjustment for salinity.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-28 19:01:55 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by ctd_salinity in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:15 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
unadjusted_09AR19941213_61TG20020206_DIC.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR19960822_61TG20020206_DIC.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR20011029_61TG20020206_DIC.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR20080322_61TG20020206_DIC.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!] |
View | |
unadjusted_49HH19941213_61TG20020206_DIC.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!] |
View | |
xover_sum_61TG20020206_DIC.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
Autogenerated comment - tCO2
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:46 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
61TG20020206 - tco2
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is +4.1 umol/kg.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests no adjustment (-2.8+/-2.1 umol/kg).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
5 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is +0.1 (+/-9.1)
umol/kg.
2 cross overs show no significant differences (<4 umol/kg) and involve cruises
that are thought to have no significant offsets in TCO2. When the offset
suggested for the other cruises are taken into account, the average of all cross
overs is +3.1 (+/-1.5) umol/kg. This suggests that no adjustment would be
required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses agree.
Based on this I suggest no adjustment for TCO2.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-28 19:02:13 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
Autogenerated comment - alkalinity
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:46 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
Autogenerated comment - phosphate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:46 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
61TG20020206 - phosphate
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 0.941.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests an adjustment of 1.094 (+/-0.024).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
7 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is 0.959 (+/-0.062).
2 cross overs show no significant differences (<2%), but they involve cruises
that are thought to have low phosphate values. When the suggested offsets are
taken into account, the average of all cross overs is 0.953 (+/-0.007). This
suggests that an adjustment of 1.05 could be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses suggests low phosphate values, but different
offsets are proposed: 1.09 or 1.05, respectively. The lowest adjustment is
preferred.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 1.05 for phosphate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-28 19:02:53 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
Autogenerated comment - nitrate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:46 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
61TG20020206 - nitrate
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 1.023.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests an adjustment of 0.968 (+/-0.014).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
8 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is 1.022 (+/-0.024).
4 cross overs show no significant differences (<2%), 3 of them involving cruises
that are thought to have no offset in nitrate. When the offsets suggested for
the other cruises are taken into account, the average of all cross overs is
1.021 (+/-0.009). This suggests that an adjustment of 0.98 could be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses suggest high nitrate values, but slightly
different offsets are proposed: 0.97 or 0.98, respectively. The lowest is
preferred.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 0.98 for nitrate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-28 19:02:33 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
unadjusted_09AR19910925_61TG20020206_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR19941213_61TG20020206_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR19960822_61TG20020206_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR20011029_61TG20020206_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR20071216_61TG20020206_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR20080322_61TG20020206_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR20110104_61TG20020206_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_49HH19941213_61TG20020206_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_61TG20020206_49HH20011127_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
xover_sum_61TG20020206_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
Autogenerated comment - phosphate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:46 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
61TG20020206 - phosphate
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 0.941.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests an adjustment of 1.094 (+/-0.024).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
7 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is 0.959 (+/-0.062).
2 cross overs show no significant differences (<2%), but they involve cruises
that are thought to have low phosphate values. When the suggested offsets are
taken into account, the average of all cross overs is 0.953 (+/-0.007). This
suggests that an adjustment of 1.05 could be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses suggests low phosphate values, but different
offsets are proposed: 1.09 or 1.05, respectively. The lowest adjustment is
preferred.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 1.05 for phosphate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-28 19:02:53 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
Autogenerated comment - silicate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:46 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
61TG20020206 - silicate
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 0.963.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests an adjustment of 1.058 (+/-0.030).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
8 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is 0.979 (+/-0.056).
3 cross overs show no significant differences (<2%), but they involve cruises
that are thought to have low silicate. The 3 cross overs involving cruises that
are thought to have no significant offsets in silicate show offsets around 0.95.
When the offsets suggested for the other cruises are taken into account, the
average of all cross overs is 0.954 (+/-0.008). This suggests that an adjustment
of 1.05 could be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses suggests low silicate, but slightly different
offsets are proposed: 1.06 or 1.05, respectively. The latter is preferred
because of the large uncertainty associated with the global inversion.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 1.05 for silicate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-28 19:03:09 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
unadjusted_09AR19910925_61TG20020206_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR19941213_61TG20020206_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR19960822_61TG20020206_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR20011029_61TG20020206_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR20071216_61TG20020206_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR20080322_61TG20020206_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR20110104_61TG20020206_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_49HH19941213_61TG20020206_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_61TG20020206_49HH20011127_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_61TG20020206_61TG20030217_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
xover_sum_61TG20020206_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:15 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
61TG20020206/oxygen: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:45 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - oxygen
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:46 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
61TG20020206/oxygen: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:15 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
61TG20020206 - oxygen
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 1.019.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests an adjustment of 0.971(+/-0.007).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
8 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is 1.001 (+/-0.024).
Only 1 cross over shows no significant differences (<1%), but it involves a
cruise that is thought to have high oxygen. When the suggested offsets are taken
into account, the average of all cross overs is 1.027 (+/-0.007). This suggests
that an adjustment of 0.97 could be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses agree.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 0.97 for oxygen.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-28 19:03:27 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by ctd_oxygen in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:15 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 18 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:5; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:15 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
61TG20020206/oxygen: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:45 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
61TG20020206/salinity: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: BOTsal is compatible with unchanged CTDsal
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:45 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - oxygen
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:46 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - silicate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:46 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - phosphate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:46 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - nitrate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:46 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - alkalinity
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:46 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - tCO2
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:46 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - salinity
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:46 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
61TG20020206/oxygen: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:15 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
61TG20020206/salinity: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using mean of BOTsal and fitted CTDsal
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:15 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
61TG20020206 - oxygen
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 1.019.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests an adjustment of 0.971(+/-0.007).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
8 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is 1.001 (+/-0.024).
Only 1 cross over shows no significant differences (<1%), but it involves a
cruise that is thought to have high oxygen. When the suggested offsets are taken
into account, the average of all cross overs is 1.027 (+/-0.007). This suggests
that an adjustment of 0.97 could be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses agree.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 0.97 for oxygen.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-28 19:03:27 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
61TG20020206 - silicate
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 0.963.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests an adjustment of 1.058 (+/-0.030).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
8 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is 0.979 (+/-0.056).
3 cross overs show no significant differences (<2%), but they involve cruises
that are thought to have low silicate. The 3 cross overs involving cruises that
are thought to have no significant offsets in silicate show offsets around 0.95.
When the offsets suggested for the other cruises are taken into account, the
average of all cross overs is 0.954 (+/-0.008). This suggests that an adjustment
of 1.05 could be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses suggests low silicate, but slightly different
offsets are proposed: 1.06 or 1.05, respectively. The latter is preferred
because of the large uncertainty associated with the global inversion.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 1.05 for silicate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-28 19:03:09 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
61TG20020206 - phosphate
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 0.941.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests an adjustment of 1.094 (+/-0.024).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
7 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is 0.959 (+/-0.062).
2 cross overs show no significant differences (<2%), but they involve cruises
that are thought to have low phosphate values. When the suggested offsets are
taken into account, the average of all cross overs is 0.953 (+/-0.007). This
suggests that an adjustment of 1.05 could be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses suggests low phosphate values, but different
offsets are proposed: 1.09 or 1.05, respectively. The lowest adjustment is
preferred.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 1.05 for phosphate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-28 19:02:53 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
61TG20020206 - nitrate
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 1.023.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests an adjustment of 0.968 (+/-0.014).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
8 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is 1.022 (+/-0.024).
4 cross overs show no significant differences (<2%), 3 of them involving cruises
that are thought to have no offset in nitrate. When the offsets suggested for
the other cruises are taken into account, the average of all cross overs is
1.021 (+/-0.009). This suggests that an adjustment of 0.98 could be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses suggest high nitrate values, but slightly
different offsets are proposed: 0.97 or 0.98, respectively. The lowest is
preferred.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 0.98 for nitrate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-28 19:02:33 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
61TG20020206 - tco2
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is +4.1 umol/kg.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests no adjustment (-2.8+/-2.1 umol/kg).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
5 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is +0.1 (+/-9.1)
umol/kg.
2 cross overs show no significant differences (<4 umol/kg) and involve cruises
that are thought to have no significant offsets in TCO2. When the offset
suggested for the other cruises are taken into account, the average of all cross
overs is +3.1 (+/-1.5) umol/kg. This suggests that no adjustment would be
required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses agree.
Based on this I suggest no adjustment for TCO2.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-28 19:02:13 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
61TG20020206 - salinity
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is -1.7 ppm.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests an adjustment of +7.1 (+/-6.6 ppm).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
8 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is -2.9 (+/-6.3)
ppm.
6 cross overs show no significant differences (<5 ppm) and involve cruises that
are thought to have no significant offsets in salinity. When the offset
suggested for the other cruises are taken into account, the average of all cross
overs is -2.1 (+/-3.0) ppm. This suggests that no adjustment would be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses disagree: the former suggests that an
adjustment of +7 ppm could be required, whereas the regional analysis suggests
no adjustment. The latter is preferred because of the large uncertainty
associated with the global inversion.
Based on this I suggest no adjustment for salinity.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-28 19:01:55 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Hide comments