Cruise: 29HE20020304 (dataset:CARINA) Data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: WOCE A16N, A17; 29HE20020304; WOCE A16N, A17;
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment is a published version for GLODAPv2!
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
RC.png | [autogenerated from RC_Toste/adjustments!] |
View | |
RC_July08.png | [autogenerated from RC_Toste/adjustments!] |
View | |
RC_SO.png | [autogenerated from RC_Toste/adjustments!] |
View | |
manualXovers.png | [autogenerated from manual_xovers/adjustments!] |
View |
- no files! -
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
alkalinity:13
cruise:4
nitrate:14
oxygen:12
ph:4
phosphate:15
salinity:14
silicate:13
tco2:4
- no files! -
View 1 ReadMe(s) (Lists all ReadMes)
29HE20020304 - 2008-06-17 14:28:40 - version: 0Posted on 2008-06-17 14:28:40 - last updated on 2008-06-17 14:28:40 as version number 0
9/26/07 this file initialized
Cruise dates:3/4-4/9/2002
Chief Scientist:F.Perez
Ship and cruise designation:Hesperides, HE081; FICARAM IV
EXXPOCODE 29HE20020304
Region:Southwest Atlantic along A17 line
19 full depth stations with 24 place Rosette
Hydro: Who - ; Status - ; S Plus -
Notes:
Nuts/O2: Who - C. Castro; Status - final; S Plus - up to date
Notes:The analytical error was
0.05 µmol⋅kg-1 for nitrate,
0.05 µmol⋅kg-1 for silicic acid and
0.01 µmol⋅kg-1 for phosphate.
TCO2: Who - ; Status - ; S Plus -
Notes: calculated from pHT25 and total alkalinity with the
Mehrbach et al (1973) constants refitted by
Dickson and Millero (1987).
TA: Who - A. Rios; Status - final; S Plus - up to date
Notes: CRM batch 54, uncertainty of 0.7umol/kg
fCO2: Who - ; Status - not measured; S Plus -
Notes:
pH25: Who - A. Rios; Status - final; S Plus - up to date
Notes: spectrophotometrically following Clayton and Byrne (1993)
CRM batch 54, uncertainty of 0.002
CFC: Who - ; Status - not measured; S Plus -
Notes:
C-14: Who - ; Status - not measured; S Plus -
Notes:
C-13: Who - ; Status - not measured; S Plus -
Notes:
H-3/He-3: Who - ; Status - not measured; S Plus -
Notes:
Other:
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
unadjusted_29HE20010305_29HE20020304_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_29HE20130320_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_316N19720718.1_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_316N19821201_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_316N19871123.1_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_323019940104_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_32OC19880723_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_33MW19930704.1_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_33RO20030604_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
xover_sum_29HE20020304_SAL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/salinity!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 29HE20010305 / 29HE20020304!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/salinity!]; recovered copy |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 29HE20020304 / 317519930704!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/salinity!]; recovered copy |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 29HE20020304 / 323019940104!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/salinity!]; recovered copy |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 29HE20020304 / 33RO20030604!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/salinity!]; recovered copy |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:2; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:21 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - salinity
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make +0. Only a few good xovers
due to few deep profiles (and those to only 3000m). Note that Inversion
suggestion somewhat uncertain (suggesting that xover results of this cruise are
not internally consistent, suggesting high cruise noise or drift for this
parameter for this cruise).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:00 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
29HE20020304/salinity: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: only CTDsal available (no BOTsal)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:40 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
29HE20020304/salinity: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using CTDsal (no BOTsal)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:12 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by ctd_salinity in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:2; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:21 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
(32)29HE20020304___(1001)33RO20030604____tco2___Denis.png | View | ||
(32)29HE20020304___(1002)317519930704____tco2___Denis.png | View | ||
32-31_MLR.png | View | ||
offset__tco2_stdr_plot_29HE20020304_32.png | IIM-CSIC inversions result plot |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
Autogenerated comment - tCO2
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : Make -999. No data in file. The
earlier recommendation of CARINA was based on calculated DIC from Alk and pH.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:00 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
29HE20020304 - tco2
Average offsets:
-2.15 (automatic)
-2.15 (manual)
Average offsets from xovers with Core Cruises:
-0.72 (automatic)
-0.72 (manual)
Inversion Results:
0.52 WLSQ
-0.3 WDLSQ
Comments: The only xover which showed a significant offset (6.45) is with cruise
31 (29HE20010305). The inversion suggests that this cruise (31) is about 5.1 too
high.
Therefore I suggests no adjustment
Suggested adjustment: 0
quality: good
Miami 2008.06.09
Denis Pierrot
Posted by betty.huss@noaa.gov on 2008-06-11 20:28:13 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
29HE20020304 - tco2
Average offsets:
-2.15 (automatic)
-2.15 (manual)
Average offsets from xovers with Core Cruises:
-0.72 (automatic)
-0.72 (manual)
Inversion Results:
0.52 WLSQ
-0.3 WDLSQ
Comments: The only xover which showed a significant offset (6.45) is with cruise
31 (29HE20010305). The inversion suggests that this cruise (31) is about 5.1 too
high.
Therefore I suggests no adjustment
Suggested adjustment: 0
quality: good
Miami 2008.06.09
Denis Pierrot
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-11 15:50:47 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
Autogenerated comment - alkalinity
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : Make +3. Inversion suggests +3,
which exactly matches its bias against 29HE2013 and several others. 3 is below
threshold of 4, but warranted by high data precision and good xover quality.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:00 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
29HE20020304 - alkalinity
29HE20020304
alkalinity
There are 6 xovers, 2 of them in the SO. The fitted offset is 1.3. The suggested
adjustment is 0
All residuals fits very close to 0 and keep inside +-3.
Very good fit with 3 core cruises
Vigo 2008/06/09
Fiz Perez
Anton Velo
--
All xovers and output of inversions are refered on figure: "Report plot for
adjustments"
Real diff (Green dots) are the differences taken directly from xover routines.
The complete segment of error bar represents the xover standard deviation.
Yellow line stand for the offset calculated for this cruise.
Black stars stand for the offset calculated for the others cruises in the
xovers.
Blue squares stand for the Fitted differences that would be obtained from the
calculated offsets (Yellow line - black stars)
Red dots stand for the Residuals between the 'Real diff'(Green dots) and 'Fitted
diff' (Blue squares)
c suffix in the upper X axis labels stand for Core Cruises.
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2008-06-09 19:39:03 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
Autogenerated update by AV for pH
Bulk update requested by Anton Velo on 2015-06-04 including comments with
reasoning (src: ph_adjustments_g2_sent_carsten_20150604.xlsx / 2015-06-04): Make
0. A bit higher (~0.004) than A16N2003 for example, but below the limit to
adjust
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-06-10 08:17:13 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated update by AV for pH
Bulk update of pH requested by Anton Velo on 2015-05-28. Comments with reasoning
will follow. (src: ph_adjustments_g2_sent_carsten_20150527.xlsx / 2015-05-28)
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-05-28 13:37:13 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - phosphate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Profiles down to 3000m.
Unacceptable noise in data (up to 20% of value!), and jumps between stations.
Per-station calibration? Note that the errors may be additive (intercept of
~-0.15 rather than ~0), not multiplicative.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:00 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
29HE20020304 - ph
Offset changed to 0 after scale conversion.
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2009-04-13 14:06:41 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
29HE20020304 - ph
Original scale TS25 (Total Scale at 25ºC)
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2009-04-13 14:00:45 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
29HE20020304 - ph
29HE20020304 32c 746
pHSWS25
There are 6 xovers. The fitted offset is -0.006. The suggested adjustment is
-0.006
Except one, all residuals are low and fits inside +-0.005.
Very good fit with 2 core cruises.
Vigo 2008/06/12
Fiz Perez
Anton Velo
--
All xovers and output of inversions are refered on figure: "Report plot for
adjustments"
Real diff (Green dots) are the differences taken directly from xover routines.
The complete segment of error bar represents the xover standard deviation.
Yellow line stand for the offset calculated for this cruise.
Black stars stand for the offset calculated for the others cruises in the
xovers.
Blue squares stand for the Fitted differences that would be obtained from the
calculated offsets (Yellow line - black stars)
Red dots stand for the Residuals between the 'Real diff'(Green dots) and 'Fitted
diff' (Blue squares)
c suffix in the upper X axis labels stand for Core Cruises.
d preffix in the upper X axis labels stand for pH determined with Alk and TCO2
using the CO2SYS routines and the Mehr'73 ctes fitted by Dick&Mill'87.
expocode ids in upper X axis stand for NA ids or SO_ids+10000 for avoiding
coincidences
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2008-06-12 18:38:15 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
29HE20020304 - phosphate
This cruise don't have all that many cross-overs, despite covering a great deal
of ocean distance.
The average of all cross overs is 0.989, suggesting that the phosphate is OK.
Also the inversion suggest no adjustment.
There is no evidence from the cross-overs with core-cruises that this cruise
needs any adjustments for phosphate.
Based on this I suggest no phosphate adjustment for 29HE20020304.
Kiel, 2008.05.14
Toste Tanhua
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-11 15:53:41 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
unadjusted_29HE20010305_29HE20020304_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_29HE20130320_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_316N19720718.1_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_316N19821201_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_316N19871123.1_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_323019940104_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_32OC19880723_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_33MW19930704.1_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_33RO20030604_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
xover_sum_29HE20020304_NO3.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/nitrate!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of nitrate plot for crossover: 29HE20010305 / 29HE20020304!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/nitrate!]; recovered copy |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of nitrate plot for crossover: 29HE20020304 / 33RO20030604!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/nitrate!]; recovered copy |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of nitrate plot for crossover: 29HE20020304 / 317519930704!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/nitrate!]; recovered copy |
View | |
Xover_nitrate_29HE20020304_9_SAVE_1043.png | [Copy of nitrate plot for crossover: 29HE20020304 / SAVE!]; |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
Autogenerated comment - nitrate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Unacceptable spread in
data (up to 10% of value).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:00 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
29HE20020304 - nitrate
This cruise don't have all that many cross-overs, despite covering a great deal
of ocean distance.
The N/P ratio is 15.73, intercept is -0.64.
The average of all cross overs is 1.008, suggesting that the nitrate is OK.
Also the inversion suggest no adjustment.
There is no evidence from the cross-overs with core-cruises that this cruise
needs any adjustments for nitrate.
Based on this I suggest no nitrate adjustment fro 29HE20020304.
Kiel, 2008.05.14
Toste Tanhua
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-11 15:51:42 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
unadjusted_29HE20010305_29HE20020304_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_29HE20130320_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_316N19720718.1_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_316N19821201_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_316N19871123.1_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_323019940104_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_32OC19880723_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_33MW19930704.1_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_33RO20030604_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
xover_sum_29HE20020304_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
/adjustments/download/102085781 | [Copy of phosphate plot for crossover: 29HE20020304 / SAVE!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/ph!] |
View | |
/adjustments/download/102085784 | [Copy of phosphate plot for crossover: 29HE20010305 / 29HE20020304!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/ph!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of phosphate plot for crossover: 29HE20020304 / 33RO20030604!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/ph!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of phosphate plot for crossover: 29HE20020304 / 323019940104!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/ph!] |
View | |
/adjustments/download/102085782 | [Copy of phosphate plot for crossover: 29HE20020304 / GEOSECS_ATLANTIC!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/ph!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
Autogenerated comment - phosphate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Profiles down to 3000m.
Unacceptable noise in data (up to 20% of value!), and jumps between stations.
Per-station calibration? Note that the errors may be additive (intercept of
~-0.15 rather than ~0), not multiplicative.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:00 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
29HE20020304 - phosphate
This cruise don't have all that many cross-overs, despite covering a great deal
of ocean distance.
The average of all cross overs is 0.989, suggesting that the phosphate is OK.
Also the inversion suggest no adjustment.
There is no evidence from the cross-overs with core-cruises that this cruise
needs any adjustments for phosphate.
Based on this I suggest no phosphate adjustment for 29HE20020304.
Kiel, 2008.05.14
Toste Tanhua
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-11 15:53:41 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
unadjusted_29HE20010305_29HE20020304_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_29HE20130320_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_316N19720718.1_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_316N19821201_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_316N19871123.1_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_323019940104_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_32OC19880723_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_33MW19930704.1_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_33RO20030604_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
xover_sum_29HE20020304_SIL.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/silicate!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 29HE20020304 / 317519930704!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/silicate!]; recovered copy |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 29HE20020304 / 33RO20030604!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/silicate!]; recovered copy |
View | |
Xover_silicate_29HE20020304_9_323019940104_1006.png | [Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 29HE20020304 / 323019940104!]; SO cross section |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
Autogenerated comment - silicate
Automated update setting data quality flag from BAD to GOOD in order to retain
these non-QCed data in final product. SvH/GLODAPv2 / 2015-01-19)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-20 14:46:40 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - silicate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -888. Profiles to shallow to
allow proper assessment. Visually, data seem no worse than ~2% biased high.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:00 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
29HE20020304 - silicate
This cruise don't have all that many cross-overs, despite covering a great deal
of ocean distance.
The average of all cross overs is 1.028, suggesting that the silicate is OK.
Also the inversion suggest no adjustment.
There is no evidence from the cross-overs with core-cruises that this cruise
needs any adjustments for silicate.
Based on this I suggest no silicate adjustment for 29HE20020304.
Kiel, 2008.05.14
Toste Tanhua
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-11 15:54:10 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
unadjusted_29HE20010305_29HE20020304_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_29HE20130320_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_316N19720718.1_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_316N19821201_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_316N19871123.1_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_323019940104_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_32OC19880723_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_33MW19930704.1_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_29HE20020304_33RO20030604_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
xover_sum_29HE20020304_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of oxygen plot for crossover: 29HE20020304 / 323019940104!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/oxygen!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of oxygen plot for crossover: 29HE20020304 / 33RO20030604!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:2; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:21 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - oxygen
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:00 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
29HE20020304/oxygen: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:40 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
29HE20020304/oxygen: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:12 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
29HE20020304 - oxygen
Although this cruise covers a great deal of ocean distance, it doesn't have many
cross-overs.
The average of all cross overs is 0.011.
The inversion suggests no adjustment (0.99 WDLSQ and 0.98 WLSQ).
The cross-overs with core-cruises suggests that this cruise needs any
adjustments for oxygen.
Based on this I suggest no adjustment to the oxygen values.
Zürich, 2008.06.04
Ilaria Stendardo
Posted by ilaria.stendardo@env.ethz.ch on 2008-06-04 18:04:52 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by ctd_oxygen in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:2; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:21 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 25 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
Autogenerated update by AV for pH
Bulk update requested by Anton Velo on 2015-06-04 including comments with
reasoning (src: ph_adjustments_g2_sent_carsten_20150604.xlsx / 2015-06-04): Make
0. A bit higher (~0.004) than A16N2003 for example, but below the limit to
adjust
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-06-10 08:17:13 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated update by AV for pH
Bulk update of pH requested by Anton Velo on 2015-05-28. Comments with reasoning
will follow. (src: ph_adjustments_g2_sent_carsten_20150527.xlsx / 2015-05-28)
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-05-28 13:37:13 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:2; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:21 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - silicate
Automated update setting data quality flag from BAD to GOOD in order to retain
these non-QCed data in final product. SvH/GLODAPv2 / 2015-01-19)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-20 14:46:40 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - oxygen
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:00 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - silicate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -888. Profiles to shallow to
allow proper assessment. Visually, data seem no worse than ~2% biased high.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:00 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - phosphate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Profiles down to 3000m.
Unacceptable noise in data (up to 20% of value!), and jumps between stations.
Per-station calibration? Note that the errors may be additive (intercept of
~-0.15 rather than ~0), not multiplicative.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:00 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - nitrate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make -777. Unacceptable spread in
data (up to 10% of value).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:00 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - alkalinity
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : Make +3. Inversion suggests +3,
which exactly matches its bias against 29HE2013 and several others. 3 is below
threshold of 4, but warranted by high data precision and good xover quality.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:00 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - tCO2
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : Make -999. No data in file. The
earlier recommendation of CARINA was based on calculated DIC from Alk and pH.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:00 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - salinity
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make +0. Only a few good xovers
due to few deep profiles (and those to only 3000m). Note that Inversion
suggestion somewhat uncertain (suggesting that xover results of this cruise are
not internally consistent, suggesting high cruise noise or drift for this
parameter for this cruise).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:00 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
29HE20020304/oxygen: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:40 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
29HE20020304/salinity: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: only CTDsal available (no BOTsal)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:40 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
29HE20020304/oxygen: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:12 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
29HE20020304/salinity: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using CTDsal (no BOTsal)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:12 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
29HE20020304 - ph
Offset changed to 0 after scale conversion.
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2009-04-13 14:06:41 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
29HE20020304 - ph
Original scale TS25 (Total Scale at 25ºC)
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2009-04-13 14:00:45 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
29HE20020304 - ph
29HE20020304 32c 746
pHSWS25
There are 6 xovers. The fitted offset is -0.006. The suggested adjustment is
-0.006
Except one, all residuals are low and fits inside +-0.005.
Very good fit with 2 core cruises.
Vigo 2008/06/12
Fiz Perez
Anton Velo
--
All xovers and output of inversions are refered on figure: "Report plot for
adjustments"
Real diff (Green dots) are the differences taken directly from xover routines.
The complete segment of error bar represents the xover standard deviation.
Yellow line stand for the offset calculated for this cruise.
Black stars stand for the offset calculated for the others cruises in the
xovers.
Blue squares stand for the Fitted differences that would be obtained from the
calculated offsets (Yellow line - black stars)
Red dots stand for the Residuals between the 'Real diff'(Green dots) and 'Fitted
diff' (Blue squares)
c suffix in the upper X axis labels stand for Core Cruises.
d preffix in the upper X axis labels stand for pH determined with Alk and TCO2
using the CO2SYS routines and the Mehr'73 ctes fitted by Dick&Mill'87.
expocode ids in upper X axis stand for NA ids or SO_ids+10000 for avoiding
coincidences
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2008-06-12 18:38:15 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
29HE20020304 - tco2
Average offsets:
-2.15 (automatic)
-2.15 (manual)
Average offsets from xovers with Core Cruises:
-0.72 (automatic)
-0.72 (manual)
Inversion Results:
0.52 WLSQ
-0.3 WDLSQ
Comments: The only xover which showed a significant offset (6.45) is with cruise
31 (29HE20010305). The inversion suggests that this cruise (31) is about 5.1 too
high.
Therefore I suggests no adjustment
Suggested adjustment: 0
quality: good
Miami 2008.06.09
Denis Pierrot
Posted by betty.huss@noaa.gov on 2008-06-11 20:28:13 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
29HE20020304 - silicate
This cruise don't have all that many cross-overs, despite covering a great deal
of ocean distance.
The average of all cross overs is 1.028, suggesting that the silicate is OK.
Also the inversion suggest no adjustment.
There is no evidence from the cross-overs with core-cruises that this cruise
needs any adjustments for silicate.
Based on this I suggest no silicate adjustment for 29HE20020304.
Kiel, 2008.05.14
Toste Tanhua
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-11 15:54:10 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
29HE20020304 - phosphate
This cruise don't have all that many cross-overs, despite covering a great deal
of ocean distance.
The average of all cross overs is 0.989, suggesting that the phosphate is OK.
Also the inversion suggest no adjustment.
There is no evidence from the cross-overs with core-cruises that this cruise
needs any adjustments for phosphate.
Based on this I suggest no phosphate adjustment for 29HE20020304.
Kiel, 2008.05.14
Toste Tanhua
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-11 15:53:41 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
29HE20020304 - nitrate
This cruise don't have all that many cross-overs, despite covering a great deal
of ocean distance.
The N/P ratio is 15.73, intercept is -0.64.
The average of all cross overs is 1.008, suggesting that the nitrate is OK.
Also the inversion suggest no adjustment.
There is no evidence from the cross-overs with core-cruises that this cruise
needs any adjustments for nitrate.
Based on this I suggest no nitrate adjustment fro 29HE20020304.
Kiel, 2008.05.14
Toste Tanhua
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-11 15:51:42 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
29HE20020304 - tco2
Average offsets:
-2.15 (automatic)
-2.15 (manual)
Average offsets from xovers with Core Cruises:
-0.72 (automatic)
-0.72 (manual)
Inversion Results:
0.52 WLSQ
-0.3 WDLSQ
Comments: The only xover which showed a significant offset (6.45) is with cruise
31 (29HE20010305). The inversion suggests that this cruise (31) is about 5.1 too
high.
Therefore I suggests no adjustment
Suggested adjustment: 0
quality: good
Miami 2008.06.09
Denis Pierrot
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-11 15:50:47 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
29HE20020304 - alkalinity
29HE20020304
alkalinity
There are 6 xovers, 2 of them in the SO. The fitted offset is 1.3. The suggested
adjustment is 0
All residuals fits very close to 0 and keep inside +-3.
Very good fit with 3 core cruises
Vigo 2008/06/09
Fiz Perez
Anton Velo
--
All xovers and output of inversions are refered on figure: "Report plot for
adjustments"
Real diff (Green dots) are the differences taken directly from xover routines.
The complete segment of error bar represents the xover standard deviation.
Yellow line stand for the offset calculated for this cruise.
Black stars stand for the offset calculated for the others cruises in the
xovers.
Blue squares stand for the Fitted differences that would be obtained from the
calculated offsets (Yellow line - black stars)
Red dots stand for the Residuals between the 'Real diff'(Green dots) and 'Fitted
diff' (Blue squares)
c suffix in the upper X axis labels stand for Core Cruises.
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2008-06-09 19:39:03 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
29HE20020304 - oxygen
Although this cruise covers a great deal of ocean distance, it doesn't have many
cross-overs.
The average of all cross overs is 0.011.
The inversion suggests no adjustment (0.99 WDLSQ and 0.98 WLSQ).
The cross-overs with core-cruises suggests that this cruise needs any
adjustments for oxygen.
Based on this I suggest no adjustment to the oxygen values.
Zürich, 2008.06.04
Ilaria Stendardo
Posted by ilaria.stendardo@env.ethz.ch on 2008-06-04 18:04:52 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Hide comments