Cruise: 49HH19941213 (dataset:CARINA) Data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: 49HH19941213;
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment is a published version for GLODAPv2!
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
RC_SO.png | [autogenerated from RC_Toste/adjustments!] |
View | |
manualXovers.png | [autogenerated from manual_xovers/adjustments!] |
View |
- no files! -
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
alkalinity:5
cruise:2
nitrate:11
oxygen:11
phosphate:10
salinity:11
silicate:11
tco2:6
- no files! -
View 1 ReadMe(s) (Lists all ReadMes)
49HH19941213 - 2008-06-17 14:28:40 - version: 0Posted on 2008-06-17 14:28:40 - last updated on 2008-06-17 14:28:40 as version number 0
9/28/07 file initialized
Data from M. Ishii 1/22/07
Cruise dates:12/13/1994-1/28/1995
Chief Scientist: K.Kawaguchi
Ship and cruise designation:Hakuho-Maru; KH94_4
EXPOCODE 49HH19941213; basename kh94.4
Region:S.O. ~140E from 65-50S
11 stations; with 24 place Rosette
Hydro: Who - H. Hasumoto; Status - final; S Plus - up to date
Notes:
Nuts/O2: Who - S.Watanabe; Status - final; S Plus - up to date
Notes: Station 11 values consistent but very different from
neighboring stations - other side of front
TCO2: Who - M. Ishii; Status - final; S Plus - up to date
Notes: Data have been adjusted to CRM #20
TA: Who - S.Watanabe; Status - final; S Plus - up to date
Notes: CRM not used
fCO2: Who - ; Status - not measured; S Plus -
Notes:
pH: Who - S.Watanabe; Status - final; S Plus - up to date
Notes: On NBS scale, no temperature listed
CFC: Who - S.Watanab; Status - no data yet; S Plus -
Notes:
C-14: Who - ; Status - not measured; S Plus -
Notes:
C-13: Who - ; Status - not measured; S Plus -
Notes:
H-3/He-3: Who - ; Status - not measured; S Plus -
Notes:
Other: Chloroa
References:
Ishii, M., Inoue, H.Y., Matuseda, H., 2002. Net community production in the marginal ice zone and its importance for the variability of the oceanic pCO2 in the Southern Ocean south of Australia. Deep-Sea Research II, 49, 1691-1706.
Preliminary Report of the R/V Hakuho Maru Cruise KH-94-4, Southern Ocean Expedition. Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo, 1996.
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:6; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:25 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213/salinity: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: BOTsal is compatible with CALIBRATED CTDsal
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:45 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213 - salinity
Manually set CTDsal calibration for this cruise, to avoid CTDsal data being
lost.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-15 21:20:39 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - salinity
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:39 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213/salinity: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using BOTsal (few or no CTDsal or BOTsal>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:15 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213 - salinity
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 0.0 ppm.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests no significant adjustment (+0.2 +/-6.8
ppm).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
8 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is -3.6 (+/-4.6)
ppm.
5 cross overs show no significant differences (<5 ppm) and involve cruises that
are thought to have no significant offsets in salinity. When the offset
suggested for the other cruises are taken into account, the average of all cross
overs is -2.8 (+/-1.6) ppm. This suggests that no adjustment would be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses agree.
Based on this I suggest no adjustment for salinity.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-28 18:53:49 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by ctd_salinity in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:6; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:25 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
unadjusted_09AR19941213_49HH19941213_DIC.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR19960822_49HH19941213_DIC.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR20011029_49HH19941213_DIC.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR20080322_49HH19941213_DIC.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!] |
View | |
unadjusted_49HH19941213_61TG20020206_DIC.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!] |
View | |
xover_sum_49HH19941213_DIC.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/tco2!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
Autogenerated comment - tCO2
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make +4. Scattery profiles
but offsets very consistent
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:39 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213 - tco2
Scattery profiles but offsets are quite consistent. Inversion(s) suggest +3 to
+4.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-04-23 09:18:41 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213 - tco2
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is -3.7 umol/kg.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests no adjustment (+3.5 +/-2.4 umol/kg).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
5 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is -7.0 (+/-7.4)
umol/kg.
2 cross overs show no significant differences (<4 umol/kg) and involve cruises
that are thought to have no significant offsets in TCO2. When the offset
suggested for the other cruises are taken into account, the average of all cross
overs is -3.5 (+/-2.8) umol/kg. This suggests that no adjustment would be
required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses agree.
Based on this I suggest no adjustment for TCO2.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-28 18:54:07 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
unadjusted_09AR19941213_49HH19941213_ALK.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/alkalinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR19960822_49HH19941213_ALK.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/alkalinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR20011029_49HH19941213_ALK.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/alkalinity!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR20080322_49HH19941213_ALK.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/alkalinity!] |
View | |
xover_sum_49HH19941213_ALK.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/alkalinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
Autogenerated comment - alkalinity
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : set to -16
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:39 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213 - alkalinity
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is +7.8 umol/kg.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests an adjustment of -8.3 (+/-2.5) umol/kg.
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
4 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is +6.2 (+/-10.4)
umol/kg.
Only 1 cross over shows no significant differences (<5 umol/kg), but it involves
a cruise that is thought to have high alkalinity values. When the suggested
offsets are taken into account, the average of all cross overs is +16.1 (+/-0.5)
umol/kg. This suggests that an adjustment of -16.1 umol/kg could be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses suggest high alkalinity values, but different
offsets are found: -8 umol/kg and -16.1 umol/kg, respectively. The latter is
preferred because of the large uncertainty associated with the global inversion.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of -16.1 umol/kg for alkalinity.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-28 18:54:25 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
49HH19941213 - ph
Original pH removed due to being NBS15 and having the CO2 system solved with
measured and QCed TCO2 and TALK. pH not QCed
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-11-27 12:24:44 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213 - ph
Changed adjustment to -999 as there are not measured pH, only calculated
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-11-04 10:52:24 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - phosphate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 0.95, following
inversion
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:39 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213 - phosphate
Changed to 0.95. Inversions (local, Indian, full Southern Ocean) suggest that
-4.5% to -5.5% is required.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-04-23 09:23:40 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213 - ph
Original supposed scale: NBS25 (NBS Scale at 25ºC)
NBS was reported
25ºC supposed
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2009-03-05 13:48:34 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213 - phosphate
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 1.080.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests an adjustment of 0.974 (+/-0.024).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
7 cross overs were analyzed, but 1 is discarded due to large uncertainty (with
cruise 49HH20011208). The average of the 6 cross overs is 1.093 (+/-0.068).
Only 1 cross over shows no significant differences (<2%), but it involves a
cruise that is thought to have high phosphate values. When the suggested offsets
are taken into account, the average of the 6 cross overs is 1.075 (+/-0.007).
This suggests that an adjustment of 0.93 could be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses agree.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 0.93 for phosphate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-28 18:55:04 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
Autogenerated comment - nitrate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:39 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213 - nitrate
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 1.042.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests an adjustment of 0.958 (+/-0.015).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
8 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is 1.045 (+/-0.021).
Only 1 cross over shows no significant differences (<2%), but it involves a
cruise that is thought to have high nitrate values. When the suggested offsets
are taken into account, the average of all cross overs is 1.041 (+/-0.006). This
suggests that an adjustment of 0.96 could be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses agree.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 0.96 for nitrate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-28 18:54:42 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
unadjusted_09AR19910925_49HH19941213_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR19941213_49HH19941213_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR19960822_49HH19941213_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR20011029_49HH19941213_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR20071216_49HH19941213_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR20080322_49HH19941213_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR20110104_49HH19941213_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_49HH19941213_49HH20011127_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
unadjusted_49HH19941213_61TG20020206_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View | |
xover_sum_49HH19941213_PO4.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/phosphate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
Autogenerated comment - phosphate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 0.95, following
inversion
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:39 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213 - phosphate
Changed to 0.95. Inversions (local, Indian, full Southern Ocean) suggest that
-4.5% to -5.5% is required.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-04-23 09:23:40 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213 - phosphate
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 1.080.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests an adjustment of 0.974 (+/-0.024).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
7 cross overs were analyzed, but 1 is discarded due to large uncertainty (with
cruise 49HH20011208). The average of the 6 cross overs is 1.093 (+/-0.068).
Only 1 cross over shows no significant differences (<2%), but it involves a
cruise that is thought to have high phosphate values. When the suggested offsets
are taken into account, the average of the 6 cross overs is 1.075 (+/-0.007).
This suggests that an adjustment of 0.93 could be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses agree.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 0.93 for phosphate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-28 18:55:04 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
Autogenerated comment - silicate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:39 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213 - silicate
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 0.993.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests an adjustment of 1.032 (+/-0.032).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
8 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is 0.991 (+/-0.059).
2 cross overs show no significant differences (<2%), but they involve cruises
that are thought to have low silicate. The 3 cross overs involving cruises that
are thought to have no significant offsets in silicate show offsets around 0.96.
When the offsets suggested for the other cruises are taken into account, the
average of all cross overs is 0.964 (+/-0.011). This suggests that an adjustment
of 1.04 could be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses suggests low silicate, but slightly different
offsets are proposed: 1.03 or 1.04, respectively. The latter is preferred
because of the large uncertainty associated with the global inversion.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 1.04 for silicate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
___________________
UPDATE
After correction of the whole dataset the cross overs show remaining offsets
ranging from 1.014 to 1.043.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 1.03 for silicate
___________________
Paris, October 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-28 18:55:40 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
unadjusted_09AR19910925_49HH19941213_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR19941213_49HH19941213_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR19960822_49HH19941213_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR20011029_49HH19941213_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR20071216_49HH19941213_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR20080322_49HH19941213_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_09AR20110104_49HH19941213_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_49HH19941213_49HH20011127_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_49HH19941213_61TG20020206_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
unadjusted_49HH19941213_61TG20030217_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View | |
xover_sum_49HH19941213_O2.pdf | [autogenerated from RC_Steven/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:6; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:25 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213/oxygen: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:45 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - oxygen
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:39 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213/oxygen: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:15 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213 - oxygen
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 0.999.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests an adjustment of 0.991(+/-0.006).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
8 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is 1.001 (+/-0.024).
3 cross overs show no significant differences (<1%) and involve cruises that are
thought to have no significant offset in oxygen. When the offsets suggested for
the other cruises are taken into account, the average of all cross overs is
1.003 (+/-0.003). This suggests that no adjustment would be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses disagree: the former suggests a small
adjustment (0.99), whereas the regional analysis suggests no adjustment. The
latter is preferred because of the large uncertainty associated with the global
inversion.
Based on this I suggest no adjustment for oxygen.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-28 18:55:52 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by ctd_oxygen in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:6; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:25 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 25 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
49HH19941213 - ph
Original pH removed due to being NBS15 and having the CO2 system solved with
measured and QCed TCO2 and TALK. pH not QCed
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-11-27 12:24:44 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213 - ph
Changed adjustment to -999 as there are not measured pH, only calculated
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-11-04 10:52:24 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:6; CTD salinity data good, setting CTD salinity offset and QC
flag to bottle values.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:25 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213/oxygen: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:45 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213/salinity: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: BOTsal is compatible with CALIBRATED CTDsal
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:45 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213 - salinity
Manually set CTDsal calibration for this cruise, to avoid CTDsal data being
lost.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-15 21:20:39 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - oxygen
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:39 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - silicate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:39 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - phosphate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make 0.95, following
inversion
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:39 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - nitrate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:39 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - alkalinity
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : set to -16
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:39 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - tCO2
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : make +4. Scattery profiles
but offsets very consistent
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:39 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - salinity
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2 Adjustment IND and PAC_SvH_20140611.xlsx): : maintain
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-06-16 15:50:39 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213 - phosphate
Changed to 0.95. Inversions (local, Indian, full Southern Ocean) suggest that
-4.5% to -5.5% is required.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-04-23 09:23:40 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213 - tco2
Scattery profiles but offsets are quite consistent. Inversion(s) suggest +3 to
+4.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-04-23 09:18:41 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213/oxygen: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:15 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213/salinity: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using BOTsal (few or no CTDsal or BOTsal>80%).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:15 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213 - ph
Original supposed scale: NBS25 (NBS Scale at 25ºC)
NBS was reported
25ºC supposed
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2009-03-05 13:48:34 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213 - oxygen
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 0.999.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests an adjustment of 0.991(+/-0.006).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
8 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is 1.001 (+/-0.024).
3 cross overs show no significant differences (<1%) and involve cruises that are
thought to have no significant offset in oxygen. When the offsets suggested for
the other cruises are taken into account, the average of all cross overs is
1.003 (+/-0.003). This suggests that no adjustment would be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses disagree: the former suggests a small
adjustment (0.99), whereas the regional analysis suggests no adjustment. The
latter is preferred because of the large uncertainty associated with the global
inversion.
Based on this I suggest no adjustment for oxygen.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-28 18:55:52 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213 - silicate
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 0.993.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests an adjustment of 1.032 (+/-0.032).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
8 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is 0.991 (+/-0.059).
2 cross overs show no significant differences (<2%), but they involve cruises
that are thought to have low silicate. The 3 cross overs involving cruises that
are thought to have no significant offsets in silicate show offsets around 0.96.
When the offsets suggested for the other cruises are taken into account, the
average of all cross overs is 0.964 (+/-0.011). This suggests that an adjustment
of 1.04 could be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses suggests low silicate, but slightly different
offsets are proposed: 1.03 or 1.04, respectively. The latter is preferred
because of the large uncertainty associated with the global inversion.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 1.04 for silicate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
___________________
UPDATE
After correction of the whole dataset the cross overs show remaining offsets
ranging from 1.014 to 1.043.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 1.03 for silicate
___________________
Paris, October 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-28 18:55:40 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213 - phosphate
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 1.080.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests an adjustment of 0.974 (+/-0.024).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
7 cross overs were analyzed, but 1 is discarded due to large uncertainty (with
cruise 49HH20011208). The average of the 6 cross overs is 1.093 (+/-0.068).
Only 1 cross over shows no significant differences (<2%), but it involves a
cruise that is thought to have high phosphate values. When the suggested offsets
are taken into account, the average of the 6 cross overs is 1.075 (+/-0.007).
This suggests that an adjustment of 0.93 could be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses agree.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 0.93 for phosphate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-28 18:55:04 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213 - nitrate
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 1.042.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests an adjustment of 0.958 (+/-0.015).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
8 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is 1.045 (+/-0.021).
Only 1 cross over shows no significant differences (<2%), but it involves a
cruise that is thought to have high nitrate values. When the suggested offsets
are taken into account, the average of all cross overs is 1.041 (+/-0.006). This
suggests that an adjustment of 0.96 could be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses agree.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of 0.96 for nitrate.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-28 18:54:42 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213 - alkalinity
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is +7.8 umol/kg.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests an adjustment of -8.3 (+/-2.5) umol/kg.
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
4 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is +6.2 (+/-10.4)
umol/kg.
Only 1 cross over shows no significant differences (<5 umol/kg), but it involves
a cruise that is thought to have high alkalinity values. When the suggested
offsets are taken into account, the average of all cross overs is +16.1 (+/-0.5)
umol/kg. This suggests that an adjustment of -16.1 umol/kg could be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses suggest high alkalinity values, but different
offsets are found: -8 umol/kg and -16.1 umol/kg, respectively. The latter is
preferred because of the large uncertainty associated with the global inversion.
Based on this I suggest an adjustment of -16.1 umol/kg for alkalinity.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-28 18:54:25 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213 - tco2
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is -3.7 umol/kg.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests no adjustment (+3.5 +/-2.4 umol/kg).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
5 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is -7.0 (+/-7.4)
umol/kg.
2 cross overs show no significant differences (<4 umol/kg) and involve cruises
that are thought to have no significant offsets in TCO2. When the offset
suggested for the other cruises are taken into account, the average of all cross
overs is -3.5 (+/-2.8) umol/kg. This suggests that no adjustment would be
required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses agree.
Based on this I suggest no adjustment for TCO2.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-28 18:54:07 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49HH19941213 - salinity
GLOBAL ANALYSIS (Cruise plot file: RC_SO):
The average of all cross overs is 0.0 ppm.
The global inversion (WDLSQ) suggests no significant adjustment (+0.2 +/-6.8
ppm).
REGIONAL ANALYSIS:
8 cross overs were analyzed. The average of all cross overs is -3.6 (+/-4.6)
ppm.
5 cross overs show no significant differences (<5 ppm) and involve cruises that
are thought to have no significant offsets in salinity. When the offset
suggested for the other cruises are taken into account, the average of all cross
overs is -2.8 (+/-1.6) ppm. This suggests that no adjustment would be required.
CONCLUSION:
The global and regional analyses agree.
Based on this I suggest no adjustment for salinity.
___________________
Paris, August 2008
Claire Lo Monaco
Posted by claire.lomonaco@locean.upmc.fr on 2008-10-28 18:53:49 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Hide comments