Cruise: 06MT19920701 (dataset:CARINA) Data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: 06MT19920322; M21/5 M21/6; 06MT19920701; 06MT19920322; M21/5 M21/6; M21-5,-6; 06MT021; erratum:06MT19920702; corrigendum:06M319920701 (06MT is wrong Expocode for this Meteor!)
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment is a published version for GLODAPv2!
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
RC.png | [autogenerated from RC_Toste/adjustments!] |
View | |
RC_AMS.png | [autogenerated from RC_Toste/adjustments!] |
View | |
RC_July08.png | [autogenerated from RC_Toste/adjustments!] |
View | |
manualXovers.png | [autogenerated from manual_xovers/adjustments!] |
View |
- no files! -
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
alkalinity:30
cruise:4
salinity:38
tco2:20
- no files! -
View 2 ReadMe(s) (Lists all ReadMes)
06MT19920322 - 2008-06-17 14:28:38 - version: 0Posted on 2008-06-17 14:28:38 - last updated on 2008-06-17 14:28:38 as version number 0
5/18/05 Initialized README file
Data from Kozyr via CARINA site 5/11/04
Ship and cruise designation: Meteor; 06MT21
Cruise dates: 3/22 - 8/18/1992
EXPOCODE: 06MT19920322
287 stations with 12 place Rosette (many only have surface data)
Chief Scientist: J. Duinker
Hydro: Who - J. Duinker; Status - ???; S Plus - up to date
Notes: Pressure approximated from depth
Bottle and cast values fabricated
Bottom depths from global topography
1 salt value flagged 3
Nuts/O2: Who - ???; Status - ???; S Plus - up to date
Notes: Includes some NH4 data
1 silicate value flagged 3
TCO2: Who - Pegler; Status - ???; S Plus - up to date
Notes: Method?, Precision? CRM?
5 values flagged 3
Deep TCO2 values north of Iceland ~15umol/kg lower than TTO for area
Deep TCO2 values south of Iceland are comparable to GLODAP for area
TA: Who - Mintrop; Status - ???; S Plus - up to date
Notes: Method?, Precision?
1 value flagged 3
Deep Alk values north of Iceland ~10umol/kg lower than TTO for area
Deep Alk values south of Iceland are at least 5-8umol/kg lower than
GLODAP for area
fCO2: Who - ; Status - no data; S Plus -
Notes: B. Schneider made underway pCO2 measurements. Data should
be available from GERMAN JGOFS for leg 3 (5/9 - 6/2)
pH25: Who - ; Status - no data; S Plus -
Notes:
CFC: Who - ; Status - no data; S Plus -
Notes:
C-14: Who - ; Status - no data; S Plus -
Notes:
C-13: Who - ; Status - no data; S Plus -
Notes:
H-3/He-3: Who - ; Status - no data; S Plus -
Notes:
Other:
ReadMe for 06MT19920316 after splitting 06MT19920322 in 3 legsPosted on 2008-07-18 11:59:38 - last updated on 2008-07-18 11:59:38 as version number 0
5/18/05 Initialized README file
Data from Kozyr via CARINA site 5/11/04
Meteor cruise 06MT21/1
3/16 - 4/9/1992
Las P)almas - Dublin
EXPOCODE: 06MT19920316
140 stations with 12 place Rosette (many only have surface data - hi sta #'s)
Chief Scientist - H. Thiel
Hydro: Who - H. Thiel; Status - ???; S Plus - up to date
Notes: Pressure approximated from depth
Bottle and cast values fabricated
Bottom depths from global topography
1 salt value flagged 3
Nuts/O2: Who - ???; Status - ???; S Plus - up to date
Notes: Includes some NH4 data
1 silicate value flagged 3
TCO2: Who - Pegler; Status - ???; S Plus - up to date
Notes: Method?, Precision? CRM?
5 values flagged 3
Deep TCO2 values north of Iceland ~15umol/kg lower than TTO for area
Deep TCO2 values south of Iceland are comparable to GLODAP for area
TA: Who - Mintrop; Status - ???; S Plus - up to date
Notes: Method?, Precision?
1 value flagged 3
Deep Alk values north of Iceland ~10umol/kg lower than TTO for area
Deep Alk values south of Iceland are at least 5-8umol/kg lower than
GLODAP for area
fCO2: Who - ; Status - no data; S Plus -
Notes: B. Schneider made underway pCO2 measurements. Data should
be available from GERMAN JGOFS for leg 3 (5/9 - 6/2)
pH25: Who - ; Status - no data; S Plus -
Notes:
CFC: Who - ; Status - no data; S Plus -
Notes:
C-14: Who - ; Status - no data; S Plus -
Notes:
C-13: Who - ; Status - no data; S Plus -
Notes:
H-3/He-3: Who - ; Status - no data; S Plus -
Notes:
Other:
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:1; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:21 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920701/salinity: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: only BOTsal available (no CTDsal)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:35 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920701/salinity: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using BOTsal (no CTDsal)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:09 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920701 - salinity
There are only few deep data south of the Scotland-Iceland ridge, and although
those seems to be high, there is certainly some uncertainty there. FOr instence,
the cross over with the nearly synoptic A16N in 1993 show no offset.
Further the cross overs to the Nordic Seas cruises show no offset.
Based on this, I recommend no adjustment.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 14:24:35 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920322 - salinity
no offset towards 18HU19820228 in Nordic Seas
offset of about 0.02 in deep waters of the North East Atlantic
Reiner Steinfeldt
05.06.2008
Posted by rsteinf@physik.uni-bremen.de on 2008-06-05 17:43:09 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by ctd_salinity in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:1; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:21 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
06MT19920322_tco2.txt |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
06MT19920701 - tco2
These data are no good, too low and not enough data to suggest adjustment, see
file 06MT19979701.pdf, excerpt from Nordic Seas DIC paper on these data.
Are Olsen, Bergen, 30 March 2009
Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2009-03-30 09:20:46 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920701 - tco2
The original cruise in the data base (06MT199203222) was split into three
independent cruise
This cruise is both in AMS and NA.
The average of the offsets is -8, but is biased by two low values (Hudson 1992
and a JH1995.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of 2.8.
Although it appears that the DIC values might be on the low side, there is not
enough evidence to suggest an adjustment.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 14:38:59 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920322 - tco2
The average of all cross overs (manual) is -5.65.
The average of all cross overs (automatic) is -3.52.
Crossovers with core cruises only suggests offsets of -6.20(manual) and
-0.16(automatic)
Only few crossovers performed manually, therefore higher confidence in running
cluster results.
Inversion results also suggest no adjustment (0.54 and -0.5 for WLSQ and WDLSQ,
respectively).
Automatic results and inversion fall within limits.
Based on this I don't suggest any adjustment for the 06MT19920322 tco2 values.
UEA-Norwich, 2008.05.30
Pete Brown
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-10 10:46:18 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
06MT19920701 - alkalinity
Most of the crossovers are close to 0, but the average is biased by a few
outliers.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -0.7.
Based on this, I suggest no adjustment.
I also suggest to change the qualtiy to good, even though there is some scatter
in the data. The larger scatter seen previously seems to be an effect of 3
different cruises being treated as one.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 14:44:17 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920322 - alkalinity
06MT19920322
alkalinity
There are 11 xovers at latitude higher than 41N. The fitted offset wih them is
-3.4.
There are also another 5 xovers that covers all the section that suggest a
higher than +10 offset for this cruise.
Surface data seems to be low comparing with GLODAP data.
In general, the xovers seems very inconsistent and fully depends on the area of
the cross section.
This make very dificult to propose a good offset.
Vigo 2008/06/09
Fiz Perez
Anton Velo
--
All xovers and output of inversions are refered on figure: "Report plot for
adjustments"
Real diff (Green dots) are the differences taken directly from xover routines.
The complete segment of error bar represents the xover standard deviation.
Yellow line stand for the offset calculated for this cruise.
Black stars stand for the offset calculated for the others cruises in the
xovers.
Blue squares stand for the Fitted differences that would be obtained from the
calculated offsets (Yellow line - black stars)
Red dots stand for the Residuals between the 'Real diff'(Green dots) and 'Fitted
diff' (Blue squares)
c suffix in the upper X axis labels stand for Core Cruises.
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2008-06-10 09:08:46 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
06MT19920701 - phosphate
This cruise do not have any nutrient measurements (06MT19920322 did, but then we
split it into thre independend cruises.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 16:25:34 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920322 - phosphate
The average of all cross overs is 1.063, suggesting that the phosphate values
are too high.
The inversion suggest a downward adjustment (0.96 for both WLSQ and WDSLQ).
The cross over results vs. the core-cruises confirms that the phosphate is high.
Based on these evidence I suggest an adjustment of 0.96, in agreement with the
inversion results.
Kiel, 2008.04.08
Toste Tanhua
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-04 20:35:43 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
06MT19920701 - nitrate
This cruise do not have any nutrient measurements (06MT19920322 did, but then we
split it into thre independend cruises.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 16:25:21 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920322 - nitrate
The average of all cross overs is 0.979, suggesting that the nitrate might be a
bit low.
The inversion suggest an upward adjustment of 1.04 and 1.05 for WLSQ and WDSLQ,
respectively.
The cross over results vs. the core-cruises confirms that the nitrate is a bit
low.
Based on these evidence I suggest an adjustment of 1.04, in agreement with the
inversion results.
Kiel, 2008.04.08
Toste Tanhua
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-04 20:34:56 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
06MT19920701 - phosphate
This cruise do not have any nutrient measurements (06MT19920322 did, but then we
split it into thre independend cruises.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 16:25:34 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920322 - phosphate
The average of all cross overs is 1.063, suggesting that the phosphate values
are too high.
The inversion suggest a downward adjustment (0.96 for both WLSQ and WDSLQ).
The cross over results vs. the core-cruises confirms that the phosphate is high.
Based on these evidence I suggest an adjustment of 0.96, in agreement with the
inversion results.
Kiel, 2008.04.08
Toste Tanhua
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-04 20:35:43 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
06MT19920701 - silicate
This cruise do not have any nutrient measurements (06MT19920322 did, but then we
split it into thre independend cruises.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 16:25:46 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920322 - silicate
The average of all cross overs is 0.937, suggesting that the silicate values are
too low.
The inversion suggest an upward adjustment (1.09 and 1.10, for WLSQ and WDSLQ,
respectively).
The cross over results vs. the core-cruises confirms that the silicate is too
low.
Based on these evidence I suggest an adjustment of 1.10, in agreement with the
inversion results.
Kiel, 2008.04.08
Toste Tanhua
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-04 20:36:24 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:1; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:21 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920701/oxygen: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: no CTDoxy
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:35 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920701/oxygen: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using none
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:09 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920701 - oxygen
This cruise do not have any oxygen measurements (06MT19920322 did, but then we
split it into thre independend cruises.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 16:26:08 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920322 - oxygen
The average of all cross-overs is 1.034 revealing that the cruise is higher in
oxygen.
The inversion suggests a downward adjustment of 0.969 (WDLSQ) and 0.965 (WLSQ).
The cross-overs also suggests that this cruise needs a downward adjustment.
However, this cruise has few deep data and the cross-overs has been computed
sometimes with only 2 stations.
I suggest an adjustment of 0.969 to the oxygen values.
Zürich, 2008.06.10
Ilaria Stendardo
Posted by ilaria.stendardo@env.ethz.ch on 2008-06-10 16:43:57 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by ctd_oxygen in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:1; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:21 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 21 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:1; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:21 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920701/oxygen: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: no CTDoxy
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:35 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920701/salinity: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: only BOTsal available (no CTDsal)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:35 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920701/oxygen: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using none
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:09 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920701/salinity: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using BOTsal (no CTDsal)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:09 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920701 - tco2
These data are no good, too low and not enough data to suggest adjustment, see
file 06MT19979701.pdf, excerpt from Nordic Seas DIC paper on these data.
Are Olsen, Bergen, 30 March 2009
Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2009-03-30 09:20:46 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920701 - oxygen
This cruise do not have any oxygen measurements (06MT19920322 did, but then we
split it into thre independend cruises.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 16:26:08 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920701 - silicate
This cruise do not have any nutrient measurements (06MT19920322 did, but then we
split it into thre independend cruises.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 16:25:46 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920701 - phosphate
This cruise do not have any nutrient measurements (06MT19920322 did, but then we
split it into thre independend cruises.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 16:25:34 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920701 - nitrate
This cruise do not have any nutrient measurements (06MT19920322 did, but then we
split it into thre independend cruises.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 16:25:21 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920701 - alkalinity
Most of the crossovers are close to 0, but the average is biased by a few
outliers.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of -0.7.
Based on this, I suggest no adjustment.
I also suggest to change the qualtiy to good, even though there is some scatter
in the data. The larger scatter seen previously seems to be an effect of 3
different cruises being treated as one.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 14:44:17 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920701 - tco2
The original cruise in the data base (06MT199203222) was split into three
independent cruise
This cruise is both in AMS and NA.
The average of the offsets is -8, but is biased by two low values (Hudson 1992
and a JH1995.
The inversion suggest an adjustment of 2.8.
Although it appears that the DIC values might be on the low side, there is not
enough evidence to suggest an adjustment.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 14:38:59 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920701 - salinity
There are only few deep data south of the Scotland-Iceland ridge, and although
those seems to be high, there is certainly some uncertainty there. FOr instence,
the cross over with the nearly synoptic A16N in 1993 show no offset.
Further the cross overs to the Nordic Seas cruises show no offset.
Based on this, I recommend no adjustment.
Toste Tanhua,
Kiel, 2008-07-25
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-25 14:24:35 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06M/19920322 split in 3 cruises
Druing the meeting in Paris it was decided that 06MT19920322 really was several
legs that deserved to be listed as different cruises (evident from, for
instance, salinity offsets).
The new cruises are now:
06MT19920701 NA+AMS
06MT19920509 NA
06MT19920316 NA
For the figures already uploaded to the website, they have all been moved to
06MT19920701, since this cruise covers both NA and AMS region, but be aware that
these plots can contain data from any of the 3 cruises listed above.
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-07-22 09:40:12 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920322 - oxygen
The average of all cross-overs is 1.034 revealing that the cruise is higher in
oxygen.
The inversion suggests a downward adjustment of 0.969 (WDLSQ) and 0.965 (WLSQ).
The cross-overs also suggests that this cruise needs a downward adjustment.
However, this cruise has few deep data and the cross-overs has been computed
sometimes with only 2 stations.
I suggest an adjustment of 0.969 to the oxygen values.
Zürich, 2008.06.10
Ilaria Stendardo
Posted by ilaria.stendardo@env.ethz.ch on 2008-06-10 16:43:57 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920322 - tco2
The average of all cross overs (manual) is -5.65.
The average of all cross overs (automatic) is -3.52.
Crossovers with core cruises only suggests offsets of -6.20(manual) and
-0.16(automatic)
Only few crossovers performed manually, therefore higher confidence in running
cluster results.
Inversion results also suggest no adjustment (0.54 and -0.5 for WLSQ and WDLSQ,
respectively).
Automatic results and inversion fall within limits.
Based on this I don't suggest any adjustment for the 06MT19920322 tco2 values.
UEA-Norwich, 2008.05.30
Pete Brown
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-10 10:46:18 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920322 - alkalinity
06MT19920322
alkalinity
There are 11 xovers at latitude higher than 41N. The fitted offset wih them is
-3.4.
There are also another 5 xovers that covers all the section that suggest a
higher than +10 offset for this cruise.
Surface data seems to be low comparing with GLODAP data.
In general, the xovers seems very inconsistent and fully depends on the area of
the cross section.
This make very dificult to propose a good offset.
Vigo 2008/06/09
Fiz Perez
Anton Velo
--
All xovers and output of inversions are refered on figure: "Report plot for
adjustments"
Real diff (Green dots) are the differences taken directly from xover routines.
The complete segment of error bar represents the xover standard deviation.
Yellow line stand for the offset calculated for this cruise.
Black stars stand for the offset calculated for the others cruises in the
xovers.
Blue squares stand for the Fitted differences that would be obtained from the
calculated offsets (Yellow line - black stars)
Red dots stand for the Residuals between the 'Real diff'(Green dots) and 'Fitted
diff' (Blue squares)
c suffix in the upper X axis labels stand for Core Cruises.
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2008-06-10 09:08:46 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920322 - salinity
no offset towards 18HU19820228 in Nordic Seas
offset of about 0.02 in deep waters of the North East Atlantic
Reiner Steinfeldt
05.06.2008
Posted by rsteinf@physik.uni-bremen.de on 2008-06-05 17:43:09 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920322 - silicate
The average of all cross overs is 0.937, suggesting that the silicate values are
too low.
The inversion suggest an upward adjustment (1.09 and 1.10, for WLSQ and WDSLQ,
respectively).
The cross over results vs. the core-cruises confirms that the silicate is too
low.
Based on these evidence I suggest an adjustment of 1.10, in agreement with the
inversion results.
Kiel, 2008.04.08
Toste Tanhua
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-04 20:36:24 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920322 - phosphate
The average of all cross overs is 1.063, suggesting that the phosphate values
are too high.
The inversion suggest a downward adjustment (0.96 for both WLSQ and WDSLQ).
The cross over results vs. the core-cruises confirms that the phosphate is high.
Based on these evidence I suggest an adjustment of 0.96, in agreement with the
inversion results.
Kiel, 2008.04.08
Toste Tanhua
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-04 20:35:43 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
06MT19920322 - nitrate
The average of all cross overs is 0.979, suggesting that the nitrate might be a
bit low.
The inversion suggest an upward adjustment of 1.04 and 1.05 for WLSQ and WDSLQ,
respectively.
The cross over results vs. the core-cruises confirms that the nitrate is a bit
low.
Based on these evidence I suggest an adjustment of 1.04, in agreement with the
inversion results.
Kiel, 2008.04.08
Toste Tanhua
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-04 20:34:56 UTC for data product: CARINA, GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Hide comments